Jump to content

Indigenous peoples in Brazil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Indigenous rights in Brazil)

Native Brazilians
Brasileiros Indígenas
Indigenous brazilians (alone/one race only) in 2022
Total population
Increase 1,227,642 (2022 census)[1]
Increase 0.60% of the Brazilian population
Regions with significant populations
Predominantly in the North and Central-West
Languages
Indigenous languages, Portuguese
Religion
Indigenous religion, animism. 61.1% Roman Catholic, 19.9% Protestant, 11% non-religious, 8% other beliefs.[2]
Related ethnic groups
Other Indigenous peoples of the Americas

The Indigenous peoples in Brazil are the peoples who lived in Brazil before European contact around 1500 and their descendants. Indigenous peoples once comprised an estimated 2,000 district tribes and nations inhabiting what is now Brazil. The 2010 Brazil census recorded 305 ethnic groups of Indigenous people who spoke 274 Indigenous languages; however, almost 77% speak Portuguese.[3]

Historically, many Indigenous peoples of Brazil were semi-nomadic and combined hunting, fishing, and gathering with migratory agriculture. Many tribes faced extinction as a result of European settlement, and many others were assimilated into the general Brazilian population.

The Indigenous population was decimated by European diseases, declining from a pre-Columbian high of 2 million to 3 million to approximately 300,000 by 1997, distributed among 200 tribes. According to the 2022 IBGE census, 1,693,535 Brazilians classified themselves as Indigenous, and the census recorded 274 Indigenous languages spoken by 304 different Indigenous ethnic groups.[4][5]

On 18 January 2007, Fundação Nacional do Índio reported 67 remaining uncontacted tribes in Brazil, up from 40 known in 2005. With this increase, Brazil surpassed New Guinea, becoming the country with the largest number of uncontacted peoples in the world.[6]

History

[edit]

Origins

[edit]
Xingu, an Indigenous territory of Brazil

Questions about the original settlement of the Americas have led to various hypothetical models. The origins of these Indigenous peoples remain a matter of debate among archaeologists.[7]

Migration into the continents

[edit]

Anthropological and genetic evidence suggests that most Amerindian people descended from migrants from Siberia and Mongolia who entered the Americas across the Bering Strait and along the western coast of North America in at least three separate waves. In Brazil, most native tribes living in the land by 1500 are thought to be descended from the first wave of Siberian migrants, who are believed to have crossed the Bering Land Bridge at the end of the last Ice Age, between 13,000 and 17,000 years ago. This initial migration would have taken some time to reach present-day Brazil, likely entering the Amazon River basin from the Northwest. The second and third migratory waves from Siberia, which are thought to have led to the Athabaskan, Aleut, Inuit, and Yupik people, apparently did not reach farther than the southern United States and Canada, respectively.[8]

Genetic studies

[edit]
Apiacá people, painted by Hércules Florence, 1827
Y-chromosome DNA
[edit]

An analysis of Amerindian Y-chromosome DNA reveals specific clustering within much of the South American population. The micro-satellite diversity and distributions of Y-chromosome lineages specific to South America suggest that certain Amerindian populations have been isolated since the initial colonization of the region.[9]

Autosomal DNA
[edit]

According to a 2012 autosomal DNA genetic study,[10] Native Americans descend from at least three main migrant waves from Siberia. Most of their ancestry traces back to a single ancestral population, referred to as the 'First Americans'. However, Inuit-speaking populations from the Arctic inherited nearly half of their ancestry from a second Siberian migrant wave, while Na-dene speakers inherited about one-tenth of their ancestry from a third migrant wave. The initial settlement of the Americas was followed by a rapid expansion southward along the coast, with limited gene flow later, especially in South America. An exception to this is the Chibcha speakers, whose ancestry includes contributions from both North and South America.[10]

mtDNA
[edit]
Terena girl at the closing ceremony of the Indigenous Peoples Games

Another study, focused on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is inherited only through the maternal line,[11] revealed that the maternal ancestry of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas traces back to a few founding lineages from Siberia, likely arriving via the Bering Strait. According to this study, the ancestors of Native Americans likely remained near the Bering Strait for a time before rapidly spreading throughout the Americas and eventually reaching South America. A 2016 study on mtDNA lineages found that "a small population entered the Americas via a coastal route around 16,000 years ago, following a period of isolation in eastern Beringia for approximately 2,400 to 9,000 years after separating from eastern Siberian populations. After spreading rapidly throughout the Americas, limited gene flow in South America resulted in a distinct phylogeographic structure of populations, which persisted over time. All ancient mitochondrial lineages detected in this study were absent from modern data sets, suggesting a high extinction rate. To investigate this further, we applied a novel principal components multiple logistic regression test to Bayesian serial coalescent simulations. The analysis supported a scenario in which European colonization caused a substantial loss of pre-Columbian lineages."[12]

Linguistic comparison with Siberia
[edit]

Linguistic studies have supported genetic findings, revealing ancient patterns between the languages spoken in Siberia and those in the Americas.[13]

The Oceanic component in the Amazon region
[edit]

Two 2015 autosomal DNA genetic studies confirmed the Siberian origins of the Native peoples of the Americas. However, an ancient signal of shared ancestry with the Indigenous peoples of Australia and Melanesia was detected among the Native populations of the Amazon region. This migration from Siberia is estimated to have occurred around 23,000 years ago.[14][15][16]

Archaeological remains

[edit]
Terena people

Brazilian native peoples, unlike those in Mesoamerica and the Andean civilizations, did not keep written records or erect stone monuments. The humid climate and acidic soil have destroyed almost all traces of their material culture, including wood and bones. Therefore, what is known about the region's history before 1500 has been inferred and reconstructed from limited archaeological evidence, such as ceramics and stone arrowheads.

The most conspicuous remains of these societies are vast mounds of discarded shellfish, known as sambaquis, found at some coastal sites that were continuously inhabited for more than 5,000 years. Additionally, substantial "black earth" (terra preta) deposits in several places along the Amazon are believed to be ancient garbage dumps (middens). Recent excavations of these deposits in the middle and upper Amazon have uncovered remains of massive settlements, containing tens of thousands of homes, indicating a complex social and economic structure.[17]

Studies of the wear patterns of precontact inhabitants of coastal Brazil found that the surfaces of anterior teeth facing the tongue were more worn than those facing the lips. Researchers believe this wear was caused by using teeth to peel and shred abrasive plants.[18]

Marajoara culture

[edit]
Marajoara culture

The Marajoara culture flourished on Marajó island at the mouth of the Amazon River.[19] Archaeologists have uncovered sophisticated pottery in their excavations on the island. These pieces are large, elaborately painted, and incised with representations of plants and animals. This discovery provided the first evidence of a complex society on Marajó. Further evidence of mound building suggests that well-populated, complex, and sophisticated settlements developed on the island, as only such settlements were believed capable of undertaking extensive projects like major earthworks.[20]

The extent, level of complexity, and resource interactions of the Marajoara culture have been subjects of dispute. In the 1950s, American archaeologist Betty Meggers, in some of her earliest research, suggested that the society migrated from the Andes and settled on the island. Many researchers believed that the Andes were populated by Paleoindian migrants from North America, who gradually moved south after being hunters on the plains.

In the 1980s, American archaeologist Anna Curtenius Roosevelt led excavations and geophysical surveys of the mound Teso dos Bichos. She concluded that the society that constructed the mounds originated on the island itself.[21]

The pre-Columbian culture of Marajó may have developed social stratification and supported a population as large as 100,000 people.[19] The Native Americans of the Amazon rainforest may have used their method of developing and working in terra preta to make the land suitable for the large-scale agriculture needed to support large populations and complex social formations, such as chiefdoms.[19]

Xinguano civilisation

[edit]

The Xingu peoples built large settlements connected by roads and bridges, often featuring moats. Their development peaked between 1200 CE and 1600 CE, with their population reaching into the tens of thousands.[22]

Native people after the European colonisation

[edit]

Distribution

[edit]
Distribution of Tupi and Tapuia people on the coast of Brazil, on the eve of colonialism in the 16th century

On the eve of the Portuguese arrival in 1500, the coastal areas of Brazil were dominated by two major groups: the Tupi (speakers of Tupi–Guarani languages), who occupied almost the entire length of the Brazilian coast, and the Tapuia (a general term for non-Tupi groups, usually Jê-speaking peoples), who primarily resided in the interior. The Portuguese arrived at the end of a long pre-colonial conflict between the Tupis and Tapuias, which had led to the defeat and expulsion of the Tapuias from most coastal areas.

Although the coastal Tupi were divided into sub-tribes that were frequently hostile to each other, they were culturally and linguistically homogeneous. The fact that early Europeans encountered essentially the same people and language along the Brazilian coast greatly facilitated communication and interaction.

Coastal Sequence c. 1500 (north to south):[23]

  1. Tupinambá (Tupi, from the Amazon delta to Maranhão)
  2. Tremembé (Tapuia, coastal tribe, ranged from São Luis Island (south Maranhão) to the mouth of the Acaraú River in north Ceará; French traders cultivated an alliance with them)
  3. Potiguara (Tupi, literally "shrimp-eaters"; they had a reputation as great canoeists and aggressive expansionists, inhabited a great coastal stretch from Acaraú River to Itamaracá island, covering the modern states of southern Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte and Paraíba.)
  4. Tabajara (tiny Tupi tribe between Itamaracá island and Paraíba River; neighbors and frequent victims of the Potiguara)
  5. Caeté (Tupi group in Pernambuco and Alagoas, ranged from Paraíba River to the São Francisco River; after killing and eating a Portuguese bishop, they were subjected to Portuguese extermination raids and the remnant pushed into the Pará interior)
  6. Tupinambá again (Tupi par excellence, ranged from the São Francisco River to the Bay of All Saints, population estimated as high as 100,000; hosted Portuguese castaway Caramuru)
  7. Tupiniquim (Tupi, covered the Bahian discovery coast, from around Camamu to São Mateus River; these were the first Indigenous people encountered by the Portuguese, having met the landing of captain Pedro Álvares Cabral in April 1500)
  8. Aimoré (Tapuia (Jê) tribe; concentrated on a sliver of coast in modern Espírito Santo state)
  9. Goitacá (Tapuia tribe; once dominated the coast from the São Mateus River (in Espírito Santo state) down to the Paraíba do Sul River (in Rio de Janeiro state); hunter-gatherers and fishermen, they were a shy people that avoided all contact with foreigners; estimated at 12,000; they had a fearsome reputation and were eventually annihilated by European colonists)
  10. Temiminó (small Tupi tribe, centered on Governador Island in Guanabara Bay; frequently at war with the Tamoio around them)
  11. Tamoio (Tupi, an old branch of the Tupinambá, ranged from the western edge of Guanabara Bay to Ilha Grande)
  12. Tupinambá again (Tupi, indistinct from the Tamoio. Inhabited the Paulist coast, from Ilha Grande to Santos; main enemies of the Tupiniquim to their west. Numbered between six and ten thousand).
  13. Tupiniquim again (Tupi, on the São Paulo coast from Santos/Bertioga down to Cananéia; aggressive expansionists, they were recent arrivals imposing themselves on the Paulist coast and the Piratininga plateau at the expense of older Tupinambá and Carijó neighbors; hosted Portuguese castaways João Ramalho ('Tamarutaca') and António Rodrigues in the early 1500s; the Tupiniquim were the first formal allies of the Portuguese colonists, helped establish the Portuguese Captaincy of São Vicente in the 1530s; sometimes called "Guaianá" in old Portuguese chronicles, a Tupi term meaning "friendly" or "allied")
  14. Carijó (Guarani (Tupi) tribe, ranged from Cananeia all the way down to Lagoa dos Patos (in Rio Grande do Sul state); victims of the Tupiniquim and early European slavers; they hosted the mysterious degredado known as the 'Bachelor of Cananeia')
  15. Charrúa (Tapuia (Jê) tribe in modern Uruguay coast, with an aggressive reputation against intruders; killed Juan Díaz de Solís in 1516)
A painting of a Guaycuru cavalry charge, 1822 by Debret

With the exception of the hunter-gatherer Goitacases, the coastal Tupi and Tapuia tribes were primarily agriculturalists. The subtropical Guarani cultivated maize, tropical Tupi cultivated manioc (cassava), and highland Jês cultivated peanuts as the staple of their diet. Supplementary crops included beans, sweet potatoes, cará (yam), jerimum (pumpkin), and cumari (capsicum pepper).

Behind the coasts, the interior of Brazil was primarily dominated by Tapuia (Jê) people, although significant sections of the interior (notably the upper reaches of the Xingu, Teles Pires, and Juruena Rivers, roughly corresponding to modern Mato Grosso state) were the original pre-migration Tupi-Guarani homelands. In addition to the Tupi and Tapuia, two other Indigenous mega-groups were commonly identified in the interior: the Caribs, who inhabited much of what is now northwestern Brazil, including both shores of the Amazon River up to the delta, and the Nuaraque group, whose constituent tribes inhabited several areas, including most of the upper Amazon (west of present-day Manaus) and significant pockets in modern Amapá and Roraima states.

The names by which different Tupi tribes were recorded by Portuguese and French authors in the 16th century are poorly understood. Most do not seem to be proper names but rather descriptions of relationships, usually familial—e.g., Tupi means "first father," Tupinambá means "relatives of the ancestors," Tupiniquim means "side-neighbors," Tamoio means "grandfather," Temiminó means "grandson," Tabajara means "in-laws," and so on.[24] Some etymologists believe these names reflect the ordering of migration waves of Tupi people from the interior to the coasts. For example, the first Tupi wave to reach the coast might have been referred to as "grandfathers" (Tamoio), soon joined by the "relatives of the ancients" (Tupinambá), which could mean relatives of the Tamoio or a Tamoio term for relatives of the old Tupi in the upper Amazon basin. The "grandsons" (Temiminó) might represent a splinter group, while the "side-neighbors" (Tupiniquim) could denote recent arrivals still establishing their presence. However, by 1870, the Tupi tribes' population had declined to 250,000 Indigenous people, and by 1890, it had diminished to approximately 100,000.

Native Brazilian Population in Northeast Coast (Dutch estimates)[25]
Period Total
1540 100,000
1640 9,000

First contacts

[edit]
16th century depiction of cannibalism in the Brazilian Tupinambá tribe, as described by Hans Staden
A painting by Albert Eckhout (Dutch), Tapuias (Brazil) dancing, 17th c.

When the Portuguese explorers first arrived in Brazil in April 1500, they found, to their astonishment, a wide coastline rich in resources and teeming with hundreds of thousands of Indigenous people living in a "paradise" of natural abundance. Pero Vaz de Caminha, the official scribe of Pedro Álvares Cabral, the commander of the discovery fleet that landed in the present state of Bahia, wrote a letter to the King of Portugal describing in glowing terms the beauty of the land.

In "Histoire des découvertes et conquêtes des Portugais dans le Nouveau Monde,"[26] Lafitau described the natives as people who wore no clothing but painted their entire bodies red. Their ears, noses, lips, and cheeks were pierced. The men would shave the front, top of the head, and over the ears, while women typically wore their hair loose or in braids. Both men and women accessorized with noisy porcelain collars and bracelets, feathers, and dried fruits. Lafitau also described the ritualistic nature of their cannibalism practices and highlighted the important role of women in the household.

Before the arrival of Europeans, the territory of present-day Brazil had an estimated population of between 1 and 11.25 million inhabitants.[27] During the first 100 years of contact, the Amerindian population was reduced by 90%. This drastic decline was primarily due to diseases and illnesses brought by the colonists, compounded by slavery and European violence.[28] The Indigenous people were traditionally semi-nomadic tribes who subsisted on hunting, fishing, gathering, and migratory agriculture. For centuries, they lived semi-nomadic lives, managing the forests to meet their needs.

When the Portuguese arrived in 1500, the natives primarily inhabited the coast and the banks of major rivers. Initially, Europeans viewed them as noble savages, and miscegenation began almost immediately. Portuguese claims of tribal warfare, cannibalism, and the pursuit of Amazonian brazilwood for its prized red dye convinced the colonists that they needed to "civilize" the natives (originally, the Portuguese named Brazil Terra de Santa Cruz, but it later acquired its current name (see List of meanings of countries' names) from the brazilwood). However, like the Spanish in North America, the Portuguese brought diseases to which many Amerindians had no immunity. Measles, smallpox, tuberculosis, and influenza caused the deaths of tens of thousands. The diseases spread rapidly along Indigenous trade routes, likely leading to the annihilation of entire tribes without direct contact with Europeans.

By 1800, the population of Colonial Brazil had reached approximately 2.33 million, of which only around 174,900 were Indigenous. By 1850, that number had dwindled to an estimated 78,400 out of a total population of 5.8 million.[29]

Slavery and the bandeiras

[edit]
A painting representing Brazilian Amerindians during a ritual, Debret

The mutual feeling of wonderment and goodwill was to end in the subsequent years. The Portuguese colonists, all males, began to have children with female Amerindians, creating a new generation of mixed-race people who spoke Amerindian languages, including a Tupi language called Nheengatu. The children of these Portuguese men and Amerindian women soon formed the majority of the population. Groups of fierce explorers organized expeditions known as "bandeiras" (flags) into the interior to claim territory for the Portuguese crown and to search for gold and precious stones.

Intending to profit from the sugar trade, the Portuguese decided to cultivate sugar cane in Brazil and to use Indigenous slaves as the workforce, following the example of the Spanish colonies. However, capturing Indigenous people proved difficult. They were soon afflicted by diseases brought by the Europeans, against which they had no natural immunity, leading to high mortality rates.

The Jesuits

[edit]
Map of Indigenous territories in Brazil.

Jesuit priests arrived with the first Governor General as clerical assistants to the colonists, with the intention of converting the Indigenous people to Catholicism. They argued that the Indigenous people should be regarded as human and succeeded in obtaining a Papal bull, Sublimis Deus, which declared that, regardless of their beliefs, they should be recognized as fully rational human beings with rights to freedom and private property, and thus should not be enslaved.[30]

Iracema (1909), by Antônio Parreiras (1850-1937), a painting representing the Native Iracema who falls in love with a European colonizer

Jesuit priests, such as Fathers José de Anchieta and Manuel da Nóbrega, studied and recorded the Indigenous languages and founded mixed settlements, such as São Paulo dos Campos de Piratininga, where colonists and Amerindians lived side by side, spoke the same Língua Geral (common language), and freely intermarried. They also began to establish more remote villages inhabited only by "civilized" Amerindians, known as Missions or reductions (see the article on the Guarani people for more details).[31]

By the middle of the 16th century, Jesuit priests, at the behest of Portugal's monarchy, had established missions throughout the country's colonies. They aimed to Europeanize and convert the Indigenous populations to Catholicism. Some historians argue that the Jesuits provided a period of relative stability for the Amerindians[30] and opposed using them for slave labor.[32] However, the Jesuits also contributed to European imperialism. Many historians view Jesuit involvement as an ethnocide of Indigenous culture,[33] where the Jesuits attempted to 'Europeanize' the Indigenous Peoples of Brazil.

In the mid-1770s, the fragile coexistence between the Indigenous peoples and the colonists was once again threatened. Due to a complex diplomatic situation involving Portugal, Spain, and the Vatican, the Jesuits were expelled from Brazil, and their missions were confiscated and sold.[34]

Wars

[edit]
A Tamoio Warrior depicted by Jean-Baptiste Debret in the early 19th century

A number of wars broke out between various tribes, such as the Tamoio Confederation, and the Portuguese. Occasionally, the Amerindians allied with Portugal’s enemies, such as the French during the France Antarctique episode in Rio de Janeiro. At other times, they sided with Portugal against rival tribes. During this period, a German soldier named Hans Staden was captured by the Tupinambá and later released. He documented his experiences in his famous book Warhaftige Historia und Beschreibung eyner Landtschafft der Wilden Nacketen, Grimmigen Menschfresser-Leuthen in der Newenwelt America gelegen (1557), which translates to True Story and Description of a Country of Wild, Naked, Grim, Man-Eating People in the New World, America.

There are documented accounts of smallpox being used as a biological weapon by some Brazilian villagers seeking to eliminate nearby Amerindian tribes, not always aggressively. One notable instance, according to anthropologist Mércio Pereira Gomes, occurred in Caxias, in southern Maranhão. Local farmers, desiring more land for their cattle farms, gave clothing from sick villagers (which would normally have been burned to prevent further infection) to the Timbira. The clothing infected the entire tribe, who had neither immunity nor a cure. Similar incidents occurred in other villages throughout South America.[35]

The rubber trade

[edit]

The 1840s brought trade and wealth to the Amazon with the development of the vulcanization process for rubber, leading to a worldwide surge in demand. The best rubber trees in the world grew in the Amazon, and thousands of rubber tappers began working the plantations. When the Amerindians proved to be a difficult labor force, peasants from surrounding areas were brought in. This created ongoing tension between the Indigenous population and the new arrivals, as the Amerindians felt their lands were being invaded in the pursuit of wealth.

The legacy of Cândido Rondon

[edit]
Marshal Cândido Rondon

In the 20th century, the Brazilian government adopted a more humanitarian approach and began offering official protection to the Indigenous people, including establishing the first Indigenous reserves. The situation for the Amerindians improved around the turn of the century when Cândido Rondon, a man of both Portuguese and Bororo ancestry, and an explorer and progressive officer in the Brazilian army, began working to gain the Amerindians' trust and establish peace. Rondon, assigned to extend telegraph communications into the Amazon, was a natural explorer with a keen curiosity. In 1910, he helped establish the Serviço de Proteção aos Índios (SPI), now known as FUNAI (Fundação Nacional do Índio, National Foundation for Indians). SPI was the first federal agency tasked with protecting Amerindians and preserving their culture. In 1914, Rondon accompanied Theodore Roosevelt on his famous expedition to map the Amazon and discover new species. During these travels, Rondon was appalled by the treatment of the Indigenous people by settlers and developers, and he became their lifelong friend and protector.

Rondon, who died in 1958, is considered a national hero in Brazil. The Brazilian state of Rondônia is named in his honor.

SPI failure and FUNAI

[edit]
Tapirapé woman with body paint

After Rondon's pioneering work, the SPI was handed over to bureaucrats and military officers, and its effectiveness declined after 1957. The new officials did not share Rondon's deep commitment to the Amerindians. Instead, the SPI sought to integrate tribal groups into mainstream Brazilian society. The promise of wealth from reservation lands attracted cattle ranchers and settlers, who continued encroaching on Indigenous territories, with the SPI facilitating this intrusion. Between 1900 and 1967, an estimated 98 Indigenous tribes were wiped out.[citation needed]

Due largely to the efforts of the Villas-Bôas brothers, Brazil's first Indigenous reserve, the Xingu National Park, was established by the federal government in 1961.

During the social and political upheaval of the 1960s, reports of mistreatment of Amerindians increasingly reached Brazil's urban centers and began to affect public opinion. In 1967, following the publication of the Figueiredo Report, commissioned by the Ministry of the Interior, the military government launched an investigation into the SPI. It was soon revealed that the SPI was corrupt and failing to protect natives, their lands, and their culture. The 5,000-page report cataloged atrocities including slavery, sexual abuse, torture, and mass murder.[36] It was alleged that agency officials, in collaboration with land speculators, were systematically slaughtering the Amerindians by intentionally distributing disease-laced clothing.[citation needed] Criminal prosecutions followed, and the SPI was disbanded.

The same year, the government established the Fundação Nacional do Índio (National Indian Foundation), known as FUNAI, which is responsible for protecting the interests, cultures, and rights of Indigenous peoples in Brazil. Some tribes have become significantly integrated into Brazilian society. The unacculturated tribes that have been contacted by FUNAI are supposed to be protected and accommodated within Brazilian society to varying degrees. By 1987, it was recognized that unnecessary contact with these tribes was causing illness and social disintegration. Uncontacted tribes are now meant to be shielded from intrusion and interference in their lifestyle and territory.[36] However, the exploitation of rubber and other Amazonian natural resources has led to a new cycle of invasion, expulsion, massacres, and death, which continues to this day.[citation needed]

The military government

[edit]

In 1964, a seismic political shift occurred when the Brazilian military took control of the government and abolished all existing political parties, creating a two-party system. For the next two decades, Brazil was ruled by a series of generals. The country's mantra was "Brazil, the Country of the Future," which the military government used to justify a massive push into the Amazon to exploit its resources, aiming to transform Brazil into one of the leading economies of the world.

Construction began on a transcontinental highway across the Amazon basin, designed to encourage migration to the region and facilitate trade. Funded by the World Bank, thousands of square miles of forest were cleared without regard for reservation status. Following the highway projects, giant hydroelectric projects were initiated, and vast areas of forest were cleared for cattle ranching. As a result, reservation lands suffered massive deforestation and flooding. The public works projects attracted very few migrants, but those who did arrive—largely poor settlers—brought new diseases that further devastated the Amerindian population.

Contemporary situation

[edit]
Native Brazilians 1872-2022
Year Population % of
Brazil
1872 386,955 Steady 3.90%
1890 1,295,795 Increase 9.04%
1991 294,135 Decrease 0.20%
2000 734,127 Increase 0.43%
2010 817,963 Steady 0.43%
2022 1,227,642 Increase 0.60%
Source: Brazilian census[37]
Members of an uncontacted tribe encountered in the Brazilian state of Acre in 2009

The 1988 Brazilian Constitution recognizes the right of Indigenous peoples to pursue their traditional ways of life and to the permanent and exclusive possession of their "traditional lands," which are demarcated as Indigenous Territories.[38] Additionally, Indigenous peoples are legally recognized as one of several "traditional peoples". In practice, however, Brazil's Indigenous people still face significant threats and challenges to their continued existence and cultural heritage.[39]

The process of land demarcation is slow, often involving protracted legal battles, and FUNAI lacks sufficient resources to enforce legal protections on Indigenous lands.[40][39][41][42][43] Since the 1980s, exploitation of the Amazon Rainforest for mining, logging, and cattle ranching had surged, which poses a severe threat to the region's Indigenous population. Settlers illegally encroaching on Indigenous land continue to destroy the environment necessary for traditional ways of life, provoke violent confrontations, and spread disease.[39]

Groups such as the Akuntsu and Kanoê have been pushed to the brink of extinction in the past three decades.[44][45] Deforestation for mining also affects the daily lives of Indigenous tribes in Brazil.[46] For example, the Munduruku Amerindians have higher levels of mercury poisoning due to gold production in their area.[47] On 13 November 2012, the national Indigenous people association from Brazil, APIB, submitted a human rights document to the United Nations, detailing complaints about proposed laws in Brazil that would further undermine their rights if approved.[6]

Many terms from Native languages have been incorporated into official Brazilian Portuguese. For example, "Carioca," the term used to describe people born in the city of Rio de Janeiro, derives from the Tupi-Guaraní word meaning "house of the white (people)."[48]

Fulni-ô representative talks about the culture of his people to schoolchildren in the Botanical Garden of Brasilia, in celebration of Indian Day, 2011

Within hours of taking office in January 2019, Bolsonaro made two major changes to FUNAI, affecting its responsibility to identify and demarcate Indigenous territories. He moved FUNAI from under the Ministry of Justice to the newly created Ministry of Human Rights, Family, and Women, and he delegated the identification of traditional habitats of Indigenous people and their designation as protected territories—a task attributed to FUNAI by the constitution—to the Agriculture Ministry.[49][50] Bolsonaro argued that these territories had tiny, isolated populations and proposed integrating them into larger Brazilian society. Critics feared that such integration would lead to cultural assimilation of the Brazilian natives.[51][52] Several months later, Brazil's National Congress overturned these changes.

The European Union–Mercosur free trade agreement, which aims to create one of the world's largest free trade areas, has been denounced by environmental activists and Indigenous rights campaigners.[53][54] They fear that the deal could lead to increased deforestation of the Amazon rainforest by expanding market access for Brazilian beef.[55]

A 2019 report by the Indigenous Missionary Council on Violence Against Indigenous Peoples in Brazil documented an increase in invasions of Indigenous lands by loggers, miners, and land grabbers. The report recorded 160 cases in the first nine months of 2019, up from 96 cases for all of 2017. Additionally, the number of reported killings increased from 110 in 2017 to 135 in 2018.[56]

On May 5, 2020, following an investigation by Human Rights Watch (HRW), Brazilian lawmakers released a report examining violence against Indigenous people, Afro-Brazilian rural communities, and others involved in illegal logging, mining, and land grabbing.[57]

Indigenous rights movements

[edit]

Urban rights movement

[edit]

The urban rights movement is a recent development in the advocacy for Indigenous peoples' rights. Brazil has one of the highest levels of income inequality in the world,[58] and a significant portion of its population includes Indigenous tribes migrating towards urban areas, both by choice and due to displacement. Beyond the urban rights movement, studies have shown that the suicide risk among the Indigenous population is 8.1 times higher than that of the non-Indigenous population.[59]

Many Indigenous rights movements have been created through the gathering of various Indigenous tribes in urban areas. For example, in Barcelos, an Indigenous rights movement emerged due to "local migratory circulation."[60] This is how many alliances form, creating a stronger network for mobilization. Indigenous populations living in urban areas also face struggles related to work, often being pressured into low-paying jobs.[61] Programs like Oxfam have been used to help Indigenous people gain partnerships and start grassroots movements.[62] Some of these projects overlap with environmental activism.

Many Brazilian youths are mobilizing due to increased social contact, as some Indigenous tribes remain isolated while others adapt to change.[63] Access to education also affects these youths, prompting more groups to mobilize and fight for Indigenous rights.

Environmental and territorial rights movement

[edit]
Indigenous protesters from Vale do Javari

Dynamics favouring recognition

[edit]

Many of the rights and claims of Indigenous tribes align with the environmental and territorial rights movement. Although Indigenous people have secured 21% of the Brazilian Amazon as Indigenous land, many issues still threaten the sustainability of these territories today.[64][47] Climate change is one reason Indigenous tribes emphasize the importance of retaining their territory.

Some Indigenous peoples and conservation organizations in the Brazilian Amazon have formed alliances, such as the partnership between the A'ukre Kayapo village and the Instituto Socioambiental (ISA) environmental organization. They focus on environmental, educational, and developmental rights.[65] For example, Amazon Watch collaborates with various Indigenous organizations in Brazil to fight for both territorial and environmental rights.[66] Activists emphasize traditional conservation efforts and expanding territorial rights for Indigenous people, given that "access to natural resources by Indigenous and peasant communities in Brazil has been considerably less and much more insecure."[67]

Territorial rights for the Indigenous populations of Brazil are largely intertwined with socio-economic issues. There have been violent conflicts over land rights between the government and the Indigenous population,[46] with political rights doing little to stop them. Movements like the Landless Workers' Movement (MST) work to prevent land from being concentrated in the hands of the elite in Brazil.[68]

Dynamics opposing recognition

[edit]

Environmentalists and Indigenous peoples are often viewed as opponents to economic growth and barriers to development.[69] This perception arises because much of the land inhabited by Indigenous tribes could potentially be used for development projects, including dams and industrialization.

Groups self-identifying as Indigenous may lack intersubjective recognition. As a result, their claims to Indigenous Territories (TIs), which often involve the demarcation of large areas of land and may dispossess established local communities, can be challenged by others. Even neighboring kinship groups might dispute these claims, arguing that those making them are not "real Indians" due to factors like historical intermarriage (miscegenation), cultural assimilation, and stigma against self-identifying as Indigenous. Additionally, claims to TIs can be opposed by major landowning families from the rubber era or by peasants working the land, who might instead prefer the concept of extractive reserve.[70]

Education

[edit]

The Afro-Brazilian and Indigenous History and Culture Law (Law No. 11.645/2008) mandates the teaching of Afro-Brazilian and Indigenous History and Culture in Brazil. The law was enacted on 10 March 2008, amending Law No. 9.394 of 20 December 1996, as modified by Law No. 10.639 of 9 January 2003. It requires that the official curriculum of the Brazilian education system include the mandatory theme of Afro-Brazilian and Indigenous History and Culture.

Major ethnic groups

[edit]

For a complete list, see List of Indigenous peoples in Brazil.

Two Indigenous men
A Tucuxi family

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Tabela 9605: População residente, por cor ou raça, nos Censos Demográficos". sidra.ibge.gov.br. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
  2. ^ (in Portuguese) Study Panorama of religions. Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2003.
  3. ^ "Indigenous peoples in Brazil". International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. Retrieved 11 August 2024.
  4. ^ Vieceli, Leonardo (7 August 2023). "Brasil tem quase 1,7 milhão de indígenas, aponta Censo 2022". UOL (in Brazilian Portuguese). Folha de S.Paulo. Archived from the original on 7 August 2023. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  5. ^ "IBGE | Indígenas | Brasil indígena | língua falada". indigenas.ibge.gov.br. IBGE. Archived from the original on 29 March 2024. Retrieved 19 April 2024.
  6. ^ a b "English version of human rights complaint document submitted to the United Nations by the National Indigenous Peoples Organization from Brazil (APIB)". Earth Peoples. 13 November 2012. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 19 November 2012.
  7. ^ Patricia J. Ash; David J. Robinson (2011). The Emergence of Humans: An Exploration of the Evolutionary Timeline. John Wiley & Sons. p. 289. ISBN 978-1-119-96424-7.
  8. ^ Linda S. Cordell; Kent Lightfoot; Francis McManamon; George Milner (2008). Archaeology in America: An Encyclopedia. Vol. 4. ABC-CLIO. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-313-02189-3.
  9. ^ "Summary of knowledge on the subclades of Haplogroup Q". Genebase Systems. 2009. Archived from the original on 10 May 2011. Retrieved 17 December 2010.
  10. ^ a b Reich, D; Patterson, N; Campbell, D; Tandon, A; Mazieres, S; Ray, N; Parra, MV; Rojas, W; Duque, C (2012). "Reconstructing Native American population history". Nature. 488 (7411): 370–374. Bibcode:2012Natur.488..370R. doi:10.1038/nature11258. PMC 3615710. PMID 22801491.
  11. ^ Tamm, Erika; Kivisild, Toomas; Reidla, Maere; Metspalu, Mait; Smith, David Glenn; Mulligan, Connie J.; Bravi, Claudio M.; Rickards, Olga; Martinez-Labarga, Cristina; Khusnutdinova, Elsa K.; Fedorova, Sardana A.; Golubenko, Maria V.; Stepanov, Vadim A.; Gubina, Marina A.; Zhadanov, Sergey I.; Ossipova, Ludmila P.; Damba, Larisa; Voevoda, Mikhail I.; Dipierri, Jose E.; Villems, Richard; Malhi, Ripan S.; Carter, Dee (5 September 2007). "Beringian Standstill and Spread of Native American Founders". PLOS ONE. 2 (9): e829. Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..829T. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000829. PMC 1952074. PMID 17786201.
  12. ^ Llamas, Bastien; Fehren-Schmitz, Lars; Valverde, Guido; Soubrier, Julien; Mallick, Swapan; Rohland, Nadin; Nordenfelt, Susanne; Valdiosera, Cristina; Richards, Stephen M.; Rohrlach, Adam; Romero, Maria Inés Barreto; Espinoza, Isabel Flores; Cagigao, Elsa Tomasto; Jiménez, Lucía Watson; Makowski, Krzysztof; Reyna, Ilán Santiago Leboreiro; Lory, Josefina Mansilla; Torrez, Julio Alejandro Ballivián; Rivera, Mario A.; Burger, Richard L.; Ceruti, Maria Constanza; Reinhard, Johan; Wells, R. Spencer; Politis, Gustavo; Santoro, Calogero M.; Standen, Vivien G.; Smith, Colin; Reich, David; Ho, Simon Y. W.; Cooper, Alan; Haak, Wolfgang (1 April 2016). "Ancient mitochondrial DNA provides high-resolution time scale of the peopling of the Americas". Science Advances. 2 (4): e1501385. Bibcode:2016SciA....2E1385L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501385. PMC 4820370. PMID 27051878.
  13. ^ Dediu, Dan; Levinson, Stephen C. (20 September 2012). "Abstract Profiles of Structural Stability Point to Universal Tendencies, Family-Specific Factors, and Ancient Connections between Languages". PLOS ONE. 7 (9): e45198. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...745198D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045198. PMC 3447929. PMID 23028843.
  14. ^ Raghavan; et al. (21 August 2015). "Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history of Native Americans". Science. 349 (6250): aab3884. doi:10.1126/science.aab3884. PMC 4733658. PMID 26198033.
  15. ^ Skoglund, P; Mallick, S; Bortolini, MC; Chennagiri, N; Hünemeier, T; Petzl-Erler, ML; Salzano, FM; Patterson, N; Reich, D (21 July 2015). "Genetic evidence for two founding populations of the Americas". Nature. 525 (7567): 104–8. Bibcode:2015Natur.525..104S. doi:10.1038/nature14895. PMC 4982469. PMID 26196601.
  16. ^ Skoglund, P.; Reich, D. (2016). "A genomic view of the peopling of the Americas". Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 41: 27–35. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2016.06.016. PMC 5161672. PMID 27507099.
  17. ^ Fernandes, Cássia; Farias, Orlando (22 January 2001). "Materiais indígenas são levados do Amazonas". amazonia.org.br. Manaus. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011.
  18. ^ The Cambridge World History of Food. Cambridge University Press. 2000. p. 19.
  19. ^ a b c Mann, Charles C. (2006) [2005]. 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus. Vintage Books. pp. 326–333. ISBN 978-1-4000-3205-1.
  20. ^ Grann, David (2009). The Lost City of Z: A Tale of Deadly Obsession in the Amazon. Doubleday. p. 315. ISBN 978-0-385-51353-1.
  21. ^ Roosevelt, Anna C. (1991). Moundbuilders of the Amazon: Geophysical Archaeology on Marajó Island, Brazil. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-125-95348-1.
  22. ^ Wren, Kathleen (2 December 2003). "Lost cities of the Amazon revealed". NBC News.
  23. ^ Boundary details are partly derived from Tribos Indígenas Brasileiras Archived 3 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  24. ^ M. Pereira Gomes, The Indians and Brazil, p.32
  25. ^ Leslie Bethell, MARY AMAZONAS LEITE DE BARROS . "História da América Latina: América Latina Colonial Vol. 2". EdUSP. São Paulo, p.317, 1997.
  26. ^ "Histoire des découvertes et conquestes des Portugais dans le Nouveau Monde | Early Americas Digital Archive (EADA)". eada.lib.umd.edu. Retrieved 19 April 2024.
  27. ^ "Estimated Indigenous populations of the Americas at the time of European contact, beginning in 1492". Retrieved 20 April 2023.
  28. ^ "Brazilian Indians". survivalinternational.org/tribes/brazilian. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  29. ^ Bucciferro, Justin R. (3 July 2013). "A Forced Hand: Natives, Africans, and the Population of Brazil, 1545-1850" (PDF). Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History. 31 (2). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 285–317. doi:10.1017/s0212610913000104. hdl:10016/27364. ISSN 0212-6109. S2CID 154533961. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
  30. ^ a b Lippy, Charles H. (1992). Christianity comes to the Americas, 1492–1776. Choquette, Robert, 1938–, Poole, Stafford. (1st ed.). New York, N.Y.: Paragon House. ISBN 1-55778-234-2. OCLC 23648978.
  31. ^ Caraman, Philip (1975). The Lost Paradise: an account of the Jesuits in Paraguay, 1607–1768. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 0-283-98212-8. OCLC 2187394.
  32. ^ Eisenberg, José (2004). "A escravidão voluntária dos índios do Brasil e o pensamento político moderno" (PDF). Análise Social (in Portuguese). XXXIX (170): 7–35. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  33. ^ Knauß, Stefan (2010). "'Jesuit Engagement in Brazil between 1549 and 1609 – A legitimate support of Indians' emancipation or Eurocentricmovement of conversion?'". Astrolabio. Revista internacional de filosofíaAño: 227–238.
  34. ^ Roehner, Bertrand M. (1 April 1997). "Jesuits and the State: A Comparative Study of their Expulsions (1590–1990)". Religion. 27 (2): 165–182. doi:10.1006/reli.1996.0048.
  35. ^ "Notícias socioambientais :: Socioambiental". socioambiental.org. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  36. ^ a b "FUNAI – National Indian Foundation (Brazil)". Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  37. ^ "Tabela 9605: População residente, por cor ou raça, nos Censos Demográficos". sidra.ibge.gov.br. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
  38. ^ Federal Constitution of Brazil. Chapter VII Article 231 Archived 1 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
  39. ^ a b c "Brazil". 2008 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. U.S. Department of State.
  40. ^ "Indigenous Lands > Introduction > About Lands". Povos Indígenas no Brasil. Instituo Socioambiental (ISA). Archived from the original on 12 May 2015. Retrieved 24 March 2011.
  41. ^ Borges, Beto; Combrisson, Gilles. "Indigenous Rights in Brazil: Stagnation to Political Impasse". South and Meso American Indian Rights Center. Retrieved 24 March 2011.
  42. ^ Schwartzman, Stephan (1 March 1996). "Brazil The Legal Battle Over Indigenous Land Rights". NACLA Report on the Americas. 29 (5): 36–43. doi:10.1080/10714839.1996.11725759.
  43. ^ "Brazilian Indians 'win land case'". BBC News. 11 December 2008. Retrieved 24 March 2011.
  44. ^ Instituto Socioambiental (ISA). "Introduction > Akuntsu". Povos Indígenas no Brasil. Retrieved 8 March 2011.
  45. ^ Instituto Socioambiental (ISA). "Introduction > Kanoê". Povos Indígenas no Brasil. Retrieved 8 March 2011.
  46. ^ a b Paixao, Silvane; Hespanha, João P.; Ghawana, Tarun; Carneiro, Andrea F.T.; Zevenbergen, Jaap; Frederico, Lilian N. (1 December 2015). "Modeling Indigenous Tribes' Land Rights with ISO 19152 LADM: A case from Brazil". Land Use Policy. 49: 587–597. Bibcode:2015LUPol..49..587P. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.001.
  47. ^ a b Oliveira Santos, Elisabeth C. de; Maura de Jesus, Iracina; Camara, Volney e M.; Brabo, Edilson; Brito Loureiro, Edvaldo C.; Mascarenhas, Artur; Weirich, Judith; Ragio Luiz, Ronir; Cleary, David (1 October 2002). "Mercury exposure in Munduruku Indians from the community of Sai Cinza, state of Para, Brazil". Environmental Research. 90 (2): 98–103. Bibcode:2002ER.....90...98D. doi:10.1006/enrs.2002.4389. OSTI 20390954. PMID 12483799. S2CID 22429649.
  48. ^ "Dicionário Ilustrado Tupi-Guarani". 27 February 2015. Archived from the original on 25 February 2024. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
  49. ^ Karla Mendes (5 June 2019). "Brazil's Congress reverses Bolsonaro, restores Funai's land demarcation powers". news.mongabay.com. Retrieved 3 August 2019.
  50. ^ Blasberg, Marian; Evers, Marco; Glüsing, Jens; and Hecking, Claus (17 January 2019). "Swath of Destruction: New Brazilian President Takes Aim at the Amazon". Der Spiegel. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 30 August 2024.
  51. ^ "Brazil's new president makes it harder to define Indigenous lands". Global News. 2 January 2019.
  52. ^ "President Bolsonaro 'declares war' on Brazil's indigenous peoples – Survival responds". Survival International. 3 January 2019.
  53. ^ "EU urged to halt trade talks with S. America over Brazil abuses". France24. 18 June 2019.
  54. ^ "EU and Mercosur agree huge trade deal after 20-year talks". BBC News. 28 June 2019.
  55. ^ Watts, Jonathan (2 July 2019). "We must not barter the Amazon rainforest for burgers and steaks". The Guardian.
  56. ^ Santana, Renato (24 September 2019). "A maior violência contra os povos indígenas é a destruição de seus territórios, aponta relatório do Cimi" [The greatest violence against Indigenous peoples is the destruction of their territories, points out a Cimi report] (in Brazilian Portuguese).
  57. ^ "Brazil Analyzing Violence Against the Amazon's Residents". HumanRightsWatch. 26 May 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
  58. ^ "Poverty Analysis – Brazil: Inequality and Economic Development in Brazil". web.worldbank.org. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
  59. ^ Orellana, Jesem D.; Balieiro, Antônio A.; Fonseca, Fernanda R.; Basta, Paulo C.; Souza, Maximiliano L. Ponte de (2016). "Spatial-temporal trends and risk of suicide in Central Brazil: An Ecological Study Contrasting Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Populations". Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. 38 (3): 222–230. doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1720. PMC 7194261. PMID 26786195.
  60. ^ Sobreiro, Thaissa (2 November 2015). "Can urban migration contribute to rural resistance? Indigenous mobilization in the Middle Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazil". The Journal of Peasant Studies. 42 (6): 1241–1261. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.993624. S2CID 154162313.
  61. ^ Migliazza, Ernest G. (1978). The Integration of the Indigenous People of the Territory of Roraima, Brazil. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
  62. ^ Rocha, Jan (2000). Brazil. Latin America Bureau. ISBN 9781566563840.
  63. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo K. (2012). Indigenous Youth in Brazilian Amazonia: Changing Lived Worlds. Springer. ISBN 978-1-137-26651-4.[page needed]
  64. ^ Le Tourneau, François-Michel (1 June 2015). "The sustainability challenges of Indigenous territories in Brazil's Amazonia" (PDF). Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 14: 213–220. Bibcode:2015COES...14..213L. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.017. S2CID 55113669.
  65. ^ Schwartzman, Stephan; Zimmerman, Barbara (2005). "Conservation Alliances with Indigenous Peoples of the Amazon". Conservation Biology. 19 (3): 721–727. Bibcode:2005ConBi..19..721S. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00695.x. S2CID 54681069.
  66. ^ Weik von Mossner, Alexa. Moving Environments: Affect, Emotion, Ecology, and Film.[page needed]
  67. ^ Compensation for Environmental Services and Rural Communities.
  68. ^ Houtzager, Peter P. (2005). "The Movement of the Landless (MST), juridical field, and legal change in Brazil". Law and Globalization from Below. pp. 218–240. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511494093.009. ISBN 978-0-521-84540-3.
  69. ^ Zhouri, Andréa (1 September 2010). "'Adverse Forces' in the Brazilian Amazon: Developmentalism Versus Environmentalism and Indigenous Rights". The Journal of Environment & Development. 19 (3): 252–73. doi:10.1177/1070496510378097. S2CID 154971383.
  70. ^ Fraser, James Angus (2018). "Amazonian struggles for recognition". Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 43 (4): 718–732. Bibcode:2018TrIBG..43..718F. doi:10.1111/tran.12254.
[edit]