Short (finance): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Undid revision 521892605 by 86.72.136.245 (talk) Please take your concerns to talk. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In finance, '''short''' |
In finance, '''short selling''' (also known as '''shorting''' or '''going short''') is the practice of selling [[security (finance)|securities]] or other [[financial instruments]], with the intention of subsequently repurchasing them ("covering") at a lower price. In the event of an interim price decline, the short seller will profit, since the cost of repurchase will be less than the proceeds received upon the initial (short) sale. Conversely, the short seller will incur a loss in the event that the price of a shorted instrument should rise prior to repurchase. The potential loss on a short sale is theoretically unlimited in the event of an unlimited rise in the price of the instrument, however in practice the short seller will be required to post margin or collateral to cover losses, and any inability to do so on a timely basis would cause its broker or [[counterparty]] to liquidate the position. In the securities markets, the seller generally must borrow the securities in order to effect delivery in the short sale. In some cases, the short seller must pay a fee to borrow the securities and must additionally reimburse the lender for cash returns the lender would have received had the securities not been loaned out. |
||
Short selling is almost always conducted with assets traded in public [[security (finance)|securities]], [[commodity|commodities]] or [[currency market]]s, as on such markets the amount being made or lost can be monitored in real time and it is generally possible to buy back the borrowed assets whenever required. Going short can be contrasted with the more conventional practice of "going long", whereby an investor profits from any increase in the price of the asset. |
|||
Short selling is most commonly done with instruments traded in [[Financial market|public securities, futures or currency markets]], due to the liquidity and real-time price dissemination characteristic of such markets and because the instruments defined within each class are [[Fungibility|fungible]]. |
|||
In practical terms, going short can be considered the opposite of the conventional practice of "[[Long (finance)|going long]]", whereby an investor profits from an increase in the price of the asset. Mathematically, the return from a short position is equivalent to that of owning (being "long") a negative amount of the instrument. A short sale may be motivated by a variety of objectives. [[speculation|Speculators]] may sell short in the hope of realizing a profit on an instrument which appears to be overvalued, just as [[long (finance)|long]] investors or speculators hope to profit from a rise in the price of an instrument which appears undervalued. Traders or fund managers may [[Hedge (finance)|hedge]] a long position or a portfolio through one or more short positions. |
|||
[[File:Short (finance).png|thumb|upright=2.0|right|Schematic representation of short selling in two steps. The short seller [[securities lending|borrows shares]] and immediately sells them. He then waits, hoping for the stock price to decrease, when the seller can profit by purchasing the shares to return to the lender.]] |
|||
__TOC__ |
|||
== Concept == |
|||
{{Finance sidebar}} |
|||
To profit from a decrease in the price of a security, a short seller can [[Securities lending|borrow the security]] and sell it expecting that it will be cheaper to repurchase in the future. When the seller decides that the time is right (or when the lender recalls the securities), the seller buys equivalent securities and returns them to the lender. The process relies on the fact that the securities (or the other assets being sold short) are [[fungible]]; the term "borrowing" is therefore used in the sense of borrowing $10, where a different $10 note can be returned to the lender (as opposed to borrowing a car, where the same car must be returned). |
|||
A short seller typically borrows through a [[brokerage firm|broker]], who is usually holding the securities for another [[investor]] who owns the securities; the broker himself seldom purchases the securities to lend to the short seller.<ref name="langasset">{{cite web|url=http://langasset.com/ishort.htm |title=Understanding Short Selling - A Primer |publisher=Langasset.com |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> The lender does not lose the right to sell the securities while they have been lent, as the broker will usually hold a large pool of such securities for a number of investors which, as such securities are fungible, can instead be transferred to any buyer. In most market conditions there is a ready supply of securities to be borrowed, held by pension funds, mutual funds and other investors. |
|||
The act of buying back the securities that were sold short is called "covering the short" or "covering the position". A short position can be covered at any time before the securities are due to be returned. Once the position is covered, the short seller will not be affected by any subsequent rises or falls in the price of the securities, as he already holds the securities required to repay the lender. |
|||
Short selling refers broadly to any transaction used by an investor to profit from the decline in price of an asset or financial instrument. However some short positions, for example those undertaken by means of [[derivative (finance)|derivatives contracts]], are not technically short sales because no underlying asset is actually delivered upon the initiation of the position. Derivatives contracts include [[future (finance)|futures]], [[option (finance)|options]], and [[swap (finance)|swaps]].<ref name=Harris>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Rd9hDRR1Yx4C&pg=PA41&lpg=PA41&dq=derivative contract&source=bl&ots=XbwJdAMTNJ&sig=LdZdsWgAEmcOXjXuEofAV-EvZrw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0HI2UKDXO-fLyQHn6YHIAw&ved=0CFYQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=derivative contract&f=false |author=Larry Harris |title=Trading and Exchange: Market Microstructure for Practitioners |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=0195144708 |page=41}}</ref><ref name=Chance>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=DT0nnLDMYTgC&pg=PA6&lpg=PA6&dq=Short selling derivative contract&source=bl&ots=g51ElVZ3Ak&sig=Q1JWFuCFrYiVPkI0uQW6pTfkwjc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=smxsUJxuir6KAt6UgJgG&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Short selling derivative contract&f=false |authors=Don M. Chance and Robert Brooks |title=An Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management |publisher=South-Western College |isbn=0324601204 |page=6}}</ref> |
|||
=== Worked examples === |
|||
====Profitable trade==== |
|||
Shares in C & Company currently trade at $10 per [[share (finance)|share]]. |
|||
# A short seller borrows 100 shares of C & Company and immediately sells them for a total of $1,000. |
|||
# Subsequently, the price of the shares falls to $8 per share. |
|||
# Short seller now buys 100 shares of C & Company for $800. |
|||
# Short seller returns the shares to the lender, who must accept the return of the same number of shares as was lent despite the fact that the market value of the shares has decreased. |
|||
# Short seller retains as profit the $200 difference (minus borrowing fees) between the price at which he sold the shares he borrowed and the lower price at which he was able to purchase the shares he returned. |
|||
====Loss-making trade==== |
|||
Shares in C & Company currently trade at $10 per share. |
|||
# A short seller borrows 100 shares of C & Company and immediately sells them for a total of $1,000. |
|||
# Subsequently the price of the shares rises to $25. |
|||
# Short seller is required to return the shares, and to meet the obligation is compelled to buy 100 shares of C & Company for $2,500. |
|||
# Short seller returns the shares to the lender who accepts the return of the same number of shares as was lent. |
|||
# Short seller incurs as a loss the $1,500 difference between the price at which he sold the shares he borrowed and the higher price at which he had to purchase the shares he returned (plus borrowing fees). |
|||
== History == |
== History == |
||
Some hold that the practice was invented in 1609 by Dutch merchant [[Isaac Le Maire]], a sizeable shareholder of the [[Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie]] (VOC).<ref>[http://www.nrc.nl/economie/article1185761.ece/Naakt_short_gaan_is_een_oud-Hollands_kunstje NRC Handelsblad - Naked short selling is an old-Dutch trick (in Dutch only)]{{dead link|date=May 2012}}</ref> Short selling can have a negative effect on the stocks being shorted, driving down the price of shares of that security. This, combined with the seemingly complex and hard to follow tactics of the practice, have made short selling a historical target for criticism.<ref>http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/eblj/issues/volume4/number1/Stanley.pdf</ref> |
|||
The oldest case ever known of short-selling dates back to 1609, the year when [[Isaac Le Maire]], one of the key [[shareholder]]s of the [[Dutch East India Company]], sold more [[share (finance)|shares]] of the company than he detained, for a delivery deferred by one or two years, betting that the share price would fall with the rise of a French competitor. As that assumption did not materialize, the company’s share price rose back and Le Maire was unable to buy back the shares to deliver them. Local authorities decided to ban shorting after that case.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.nrc.nl/international/article1993052.ece/Dutch_invented_short_selling_in_1609 |
|||
| title = The Dutch invented short selling in 1609 |
|||
| date = 22 September 2008 |
|||
| accessdate = 5 December 2010 |
|||
| publisher = NRC Handelsblad}}</ref> |
|||
In the eighteenth century, England banned it outright.<ref>{{cite web|author=Tom Arnold |url=http://www.charliefell.com/index.php/articles/2-general/35-germans-wrong-to-shoot-the-short-selling-messenger |title=Germans wrong to shoot the short-selling messenger |publisher=Charliefell.com |date=2011-10-20 |accessdate=2012-06-06}}</ref> The London banking house of [[Neal, James, Fordyce and Down]] collapsed in June 1772, precipitating a major crisis which included the collapse of almost every private bank in Scotland, and a liquidity crisis in the two major banking centres of the world, London and Amsterdam. The bank had been speculating by shorting [[East India Company]] stock on a massive scale, and apparently using customer deposits to cover losses. It was perceived{{fact|date=May 2012}} as having a magnifying effect in the violent downturn in the [[Tulip mania|Dutch tulip market]] in the eighteenth century. In another well-referenced example, [[George Soros]] became notorious for "breaking the [[Bank of England]]" on [[Black Wednesday]] of 1992, when he sold short more than $10 billion worth of [[pounds sterling]]. |
|||
In 1838, a [[broker]] in New York, [[Jacob Little]], decided to sell short shares of the Erie company, which he reckoned was overpriced. The shares delivery was planned for 6 to 12 months later. Some of his enemies, knowing he would sooner or later need to obtain such securities, rushed to buy them en masse on the market, to have their price rise in an attempt of [[short squeeze]]. They, however, ignored that Little held [[convertible bond]]s issued by Erie. Little only had to request conversion of his bonds to meet his deliveries.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.scripophily.net/rocandsyrrai.html |
|||
| year = 1882 |
|||
| publisher = [[The New York Times]] |
|||
| title = The Convertible Bonds - How Jacob Little Manipulated Matters Years Ago |
|||
| accessdate = 6 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> The local authorities decided thereafter to limit to 60 days the delivery time of a short sale. |
|||
The term "short" was in use from at least the mid-nineteenth century. It is commonly understood that "short" is used because the short-seller is in a deficit position with his [[brokerage firm|brokerage house]]. [[Jacob Little]] was known as The Great Bear of Wall Street who began shorting stocks in the United States in 1822.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.encyberpedia.com/jacoblittle.htm |title=Scripophily - PSTA - Professional Scripophily Trade Association |publisher=Encyberpedia.com |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
Short-selling followed by another failed corner, associated to poor assessment of the number of shares outstanding, was also one of the causes of the [[Panic of 1907]]. |
|||
In 1931, after the [[gold standard]] was abandoned by [[Great-Britain]], British, then US, authorities decided a temporary ban of short-selling.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://finance.eller.arizona.edu/documents/seminars/2008-9/CJones.Short1930s10-08.pdf |
|||
| publisher = University of Arizona |
|||
| date = September 2008 |
|||
| author = Charles M. Jones |
|||
| title = Shorting restrictions: Revisiting the 1930's |
|||
| accessdate = 5 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Short sellers were blamed for the [[Wall Street Crash of 1929]].<ref name="reuters-08-09-26">{{cite news |
|||
In 1938, the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] (SEC) adopted the [[uptick rule]], allowing short-selling only at a price higher or equal to the previous quote; this provision has been enforced until 2007. |
|||
| title = Short sellers have been the villain for 400 years |
|||
| publisher = ''Reuters'' |
|||
| date = 2008-09-26 |
|||
| url = http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSTRE48P7CS20080926?PageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true |
|||
| accessdate = 2008-09-28}}</ref> [[Regulation]]s governing short selling were implemented in the United States in 1929 and in 1940. {{Citation needed|date=May 2009}} Political fallout from the 1929 crash led Congress to enact a law banning short sellers from selling shares during a downtick; this was known as the [[uptick rule]], and this was in effect until July 3, 2007 when it was removed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Release No. 34-55970).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2007/34-55970.pdf |title=SEC Release No. 34-55970 |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> President [[Herbert Hoover]] condemned short sellers and even [[J. Edgar Hoover]] said he would investigate short sellers for their role in prolonging the [[Great Depression|Depression]].{{fact|date=May 2012}} A few years later, in 1949, [[Alfred Winslow Jones]] founded a fund (that was unregulated) that bought stocks while selling other stocks short, hence hedging some of the [[market risk]], and the [[hedge fund]] was born.<ref>{{cite web|last=Lindgren |first=Hugo |url=http://nymag.com/news/features/2007/hedgefunds/30345/ |title=New York Magazine - The Creation of the Hedge Fund |publisher=Nymag.com |date=2007-04-09 |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
Negative news, such as litigation against a company, may also entice professional traders to sell the stock short in hope of the stock price going down. |
|||
In 1949, [[Alfred Winslow Jones]] launched the first ever [[hedge fund]], of a ''long/short'' type, that is, binding the purchase of a security and the short-sale of another, pre-borrowed, security.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://nymag.com/news/features/2007/hedgefunds/30345 |
|||
| date = 9 April 2007 |
|||
| publisher = New York Magazine |
|||
| title = The Long/Short Story Short |
|||
| accessdate = 12 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
During the [[Dot-com bubble]], shorting a start-up company could backfire since it could be taken over at a price higher than the price at which speculators shorted.{{fact|date=May 2012}} Short-sellers were forced to cover their positions at acquisition prices, while in many cases the firm often overpaid for the start-up.{{fact|date=May 2012}} |
|||
On September 16, 1992, [[George Soros]] got famous for short-selling some $10 billion worth of pound sterling, correctly anticipating an imminent [[devaluation]] of the currency by the then [[John Major]]’s UK cabinet. |
|||
=== Naked short selling restrictions in 2008 === |
|||
In 2004, observing a persistently high level of [[Settlement (finance)|settlement]] fails, the SEC adopted the so-called [[Regulation SHO]], requiring financial intermediaries to borrow shares '''before''' selling them unless having « reasonable certainty » to be able to do so within the next three days, and to close out without delay the settlement fails older than 10 days.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = Key features of Regulation SHO |
|||
| date = 3 January 2005 |
|||
| url = http://regsho.com/faq/regsho.php |
|||
| publisher = SEC |
|||
| accessdate = 28 November 2010}}</ref> |
|||
In September 2008 short selling, exacerbated by [[naked short selling]],<ref>{{cite web |
|||
The [[financial crisis of 2008]] induced many stock exchange watchdogs, often under pressure from their own government, to temporarily compel the intermediaries of investors shorting financial [[stock]]s to borrow shares beforehand, and to publish short positions higher than a given threshold, mostly 0.25% of issued equity. |
|||
| title = EMERGENCY ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(k)(2) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 TAKING TEMPORARY ACTION TO RESPOND TO MARKET DEVELOPMENTS. Release NO. 34-58592 |
|||
| url = http://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2008/34-58592.pdf |
|||
| date= September 18, 2008 |
|||
| postscript = <!--None--> }}</ref> was seen as a contributing factor to undesirable market volatility, and was subsequently prohibited by the [[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]] (SEC) for 799 financial companies for three weeks in an effort to stabilize those companies.<ref name="sec-211">{{cite news |
|||
| title = SEC Halts Short Selling of Financial Stocks to Protect Investors and Markets |
|||
| publisher = '' '' |
|||
| date = 2008-09-19 |
|||
| url = http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-211.htm |
|||
| accessdate = 2008-09-19}}</ref> At the same time the U.K. [[Financial Services Authority]] (FSA) prohibited short selling for 32 financial companies.<ref name="FSA-102">{{cite news |
|||
| title = FSA statement on short positions in financial stocks |
|||
| publisher = ''FSA'' |
|||
| date = 2008-09-18 |
|||
| url = http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2008/102.shtml |
|||
| accessdate = 2008-09-19}}</ref> On September 22, [[Australia]] enacted even more extensive measures with a total ban of short selling.<ref name="aus-09-22">{{cite news |
|||
| title = Australian short selling ban goes further than other bourses |
|||
| publisher = ''NBR'' |
|||
| date = 2008-09-22 |
|||
| url = http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/australian-short-selling-ban-goes-further-other-bourses-35494 |
|||
| accessdate = 2008-09-22 }}</ref> Also on September 22, the Spanish market regulator, [[Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores|CNMV]], required investors to notify it of any short positions in financial institutions, if they exceed 0.25% of a company's share capital, and it also restricted naked shorting.<ref name="spa-220908">{{cite news |
|||
| title = La CNMV también estrecha el cerco a las posiciones bajistas |
|||
| publisher = ''Expansión'' |
|||
| date = 2008-09-22 |
|||
| url = http://www.expansion.com/2008/09/22/inversion/1167625.html |
|||
| accessdate = 2008-09-22}}</ref> |
|||
In an interview with the [[Washington Post]] in late December 2008, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman [[Christopher Cox]] said that the decision to impose a three-week ban on short selling of financial company stocks was taken reluctantly, but that the view at the time, from Treasury Secretary [[Henry M. Paulson]] and [[Federal Reserve]] chairman [[Ben S. Bernanke]], was that "if we did not act, and act at that instant, these financial institutions could fail as a result and there would be nothing left to save." Later he changed his mind and thought the ban unproductive.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/23/AR2008122302765.html?sid=ST2008122302866&s_pos= | work=The Washington Post | title=SEC Chair Defends His Restraint During Financial Crisis | first1=Amit R. | last1=Paley | first2=David S. | last2=Hilzenrath | date=2008-12-24 | accessdate=2010-05-23}}</ref> In a December 2008 interview with [[Reuters]], he explained that the [[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission|SEC's]] Office of Economic Analysis was still evaluating data from the temporary ban, and that preliminary findings point to several unintended market consequences and side effects. "While the actual effects of this temporary action will not be fully understood for many more months, if not years," he said, "knowing what we know now, I believe on balance the [[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission|Commission]] would not do it again.”<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE4BU3FL20081231 | work=Reuters | title=SEC chief has regrets over short-selling ban | date=2008-12-31}}</ref> |
|||
It was also in 2008 when a spectacular corner happened on the [[Volkswagen]] stock: while [[Porsche]] already held 42.6 % of the shares and the state of [[Lower-Saxony]] 20 %, hedge funds anticipating a fall of the Volkswagen stock had borrowed huge quantities of shares to sell them short; they ignored that Porsche had bought calls (options to purchase) representing another 31.5 % of the company’s equity capital, to several banks which had themselves bought spot the underlying shares to allow for a situation in which these options could be exercised. When these hedge funds had to reimburse their borrowings and look for shares on a market that had dried up, the stock price of Volkswagen suddenly rocketed and hedge funds incurred a loss of €20 to 30 billion.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/engineering/article5033654.ece |
|||
| date = 29 October 2008 |
|||
| publisher = The Times |
|||
| title = Porsche puts Volkswagen short-sellers in a spin |
|||
| accessdate = 17 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
=== Naked short selling restrictions in European economic crisis === |
|||
The [[2010 Greek economic crisis]] induced new measures to restrict shorting practices, while temporary bans decided in 2008 had been rolled over several times. More specifically, [[Germany]] unilaterally decided to prohibit naked short-selling of sovereign [[bond (finance)|bonds]] of the [[euro zone]].<ref name="merkel">{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23835640-markets-go-wild-as-angela-merkel-goes-it-alone.do |
|||
| date = 19 may 2010 |
|||
| author = Hugo Duncan |
|||
| publisher = [[The Evening Standard]] |
|||
| title = Markets panic after Angela Merkel bans short-selling |
|||
| accessdate = 29 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
In June 2010, due to the economical crisis Germany permanently banned naked short selling.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64R2PF20100528|title=Germany to permanently ban some short selling: Bafin'|author=Reuters|date=May 28, 2010|publisher=Reuters}}</ref> |
|||
== Definitions == |
|||
=== Selling short and selling forward === |
|||
Selling a crop months before the harvest, or selling in advance the cargo of a vessel awaited in several weeks, are techniques which date back to antiquity. Technically, these sales are short, or “uncovered”: the object to the sale does not exist yet. They are also forward sales. |
|||
In August 2011, France, Italy, Spain, Belgium and South Korea banned all short selling in their financial stocks.<ref>{{citation |title= WRAPUP 7-Europe curbs short-selling as credit markets swoon |work= Reuters |author= Geert de Clercq, Paul Day |date= 11 August 2011 |url= http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/12/europe-banks-idUSLDE77A05U20110812 }}</ref> |
|||
However, any forward sale is not necessarily short. If the bank’s delayed settlement service, such as the French SRD, allows the retail customer to settle with a delay, the bank makes sure, most often, that the underlying securities are already recorded on the customer’s account. |
|||
== Mechanism == |
|||
Financial markets apply the term of « forward » sales to [[derivative (finance)|derivative products]], "[[futures contract|futures]]" and [[option (finance)|option]]s, but that of “short” or “uncovered” sales when negotiation takes place on a [[stock exchange]]. However the terms « shorting » and « going short », as opposed to « going long », apply to both [[futures exchange|futures markets]] and stock exchanges. |
|||
{{seealso|Securities lending}} |
|||
Short selling stock consists of the following: |
|||
* The [[speculation|speculator]] instructs the broker to sell the shares and the proceeds are credited to his broker's account at the firm upon which the firm can earn interest. Generally, the short seller does not earn interest on the short proceeds and cannot use or encumber the proceeds for another transaction.<ref>Federal Reserve Board. [http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=2b1a96c73dde6afa0bc0caef12fa5a8f&rgn=div8&view=text&node=12:3.0.1.1.1.0.1.12&idno=12 Regulation T § 220.12]</ref> |
|||
Indeed, futures markets imposed themselves notably because the opportunity of anticipating the fall of an asset’s price is equal to that of anticipating its rise, while on stock markets, short-selling is a more delicate and regulated practice. |
|||
* Upon completion of the sale, the investor has 3 days (in the US) to borrow the shares. If required by law, the investor first ensures that cash or equity is on deposit with his brokerage firm as collateral for the [[Margin (finance)|initial short margin requirement]]. Some short sellers, mainly firms and hedge funds, participate in the practice of [[naked short selling]], where the shorted shares are not borrowed or delivered. |
|||
=== ''naked'' short-selling and the ''locate'' === |
|||
The wording of « naked short-selling » is inspired, under the guise of a pleonasm, from the US securities regulation, but has no single meaning: some understand from it the fact to sell stocks without having prior property, either through purchases or borrowings, others refer to it to note a settlement fail. Under a median definition, shorting would be “naked” when the shares are not held on the securities account, e.g. through a borrowing, and the seller would not have managed to borrow them for delivery to his account prior to the settlement of the sale, and nor would the seller have any guarantee, through a framework agreement with a broker, to have them available on request. |
|||
* The speculator may close the position by buying back the shares (called covering). If the price has dropped, he makes a profit. If the stock advanced, he takes a loss. |
|||
In the [[United States]], the so-called [[locate (finance)|locate]] rule, enforced since 2007, states the conditions to meet for a short sale to be licit, that is, not « naked »; either a link may be established with a [[hedge|hedging]] trade, even if the shares are not yet booked on the account, or the stock must be included in the list of [[easy to borrow]] stocks, published daily by a broker. However, this provision remains based on the registrants’ good faith and the SEC has no means to make sure they do abide by the rule. |
|||
* Finally, the speculator may return the shares to the lender or stay short indefinitely. |
|||
The [[European commission]] is considering the adoption of a similar rule in a directive on markets in financial instruments to be released in 2012.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/business/global/16euro.html |
|||
| title = Europe Proposes Rules to Help Steady Markets |
|||
| date = 15 September 2010 |
|||
| publisher = The New York Times |
|||
| accessdate = 21 October 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
* At any time, the lender may call for the return of his shares e.g. because he wants to sell them. The borrower must buy shares on the market and return them to the lender (or he must borrow the shares from elsewhere). When the broker completes this transaction automatically, it is called a 'buy-in'. |
|||
== Operating mode == |
|||
=== From trading to settlement === |
|||
The technique is generally not accessible to retail or corporate customers because most banks check that shares are booked on the account prior to allowing their sale. However, [[NYSE Euronext]] proposes a delayed settlement service (SRD) which allows the investor to settle at month end his sales of stocks eligible to the service by virtue of their liquidity. In that case, it is the seller’s intermediary who borrows the securities to deliver them to the buyer and reimburses them at month end. A sale on the SRD therefore amounts to short-selling. |
|||
When a stock exchanges executes, on day One, a sale order, the execution notice is transmitted to the [[clearing house (finance)|clearing house]], which translates it, in turn, into a settlement instruction; the [[central securities depository]] (CSD) controls there is no shortage of securities on day Four, since most depositories settle trades with a standard delay of 3 working days. For a sale to be settled, it is enough for shares to be available 3 days later. If a bank buys securities in T0, sells them in T1, receives them in T3 and delivers them in T4, it is technically short between T1 and T3. |
|||
Short-selling is mostly practiced on [[over-the-counter (finance)|over the counter]] markets, that is, outside the stock exchange. Two financial institutions can agree, one to buy, the other to sell, a given security for a given future settlement date, which may be later than the standard settlement delay applicable by a stock exchange. |
|||
Shunning the exchange, the parties can wait until the eve of the unwinding date to carry their instructions, one for reception, the other for delivery, towards the central securities depository. |
|||
=== |
=== Shorting stock in the U.S. === |
||
In the U.S., in order to sell stocks short, the seller must arrange for a broker-dealer to confirm that it is able to make delivery of the shorted securities. This is referred to as a "locate.” Brokers have a variety of means to borrow stocks in order to facilitate locates and make good delivery of the shorted security. |
|||
Several types of transactions can be carried out to cover a short sale: |
|||
* a [[securities lending|securities borrowing]]; |
|||
* an outright securities purchase; |
|||
* a reverse [[repurchase agreement|repo]], or temporary purchase; |
|||
* the exercise of a [[call option]]. |
|||
The securities borrowing is the most appropriate hedge, other techniques having an incidence on treasury. The borrowing allows to have securities delivered against the promise to return same-nature securities at a future date, generally in several days or weeks, and against a [[fee]]. |
|||
The vast majority of stocks borrowed by U.S. brokers come from loans made by the leading custody banks and fund management companies (see list below). Institutions often lend out their shares in order to earn a little extra money on their investments. These institutional loans are usually arranged by the custodian who holds the securities for the institution. In an institutional stock loan, the borrower puts up cash collateral, typically 102% of the value of the stock. The cash collateral is then invested by the lender, who often rebates part of the interest to the borrower. The interest that is kept by the lender is the compensation to the lender for the stock loan. |
|||
Short-selling is also used by the placing agent of an [[initial public offering]] (IPO) or of a new tranche of an [[Obligation assimilable du Trésor]], or by the institution in charge of converting a [[convertible bond]] into equities. It is covered by the issue at a future date of the new securities. |
|||
The short-seller may be tempted not to cover; he can bet he will be able to buy in on time the stock at a cheaper price without bearing the cost of a borrowing; national regulations tolerate this practice more or less. |
|||
Brokerage firms can also borrow stocks from the accounts of their own customers. Typical margin account agreements give brokerage firms the right to borrow customer shares without notifying the customer. In general, brokerage accounts are only allowed to lend shares from accounts for which customers have "debit balances", meaning they have borrowed from the account. SEC Rule 15c3-3 imposes such severe restrictions on the lending of shares from cash accounts or excess margin (fully paid for) shares from margin accounts that most brokerage firms do not bother except in rare circumstances. (These restrictions include that the broker must have the express permission of the customer and provide collateral or a letter of credit.) |
|||
=== Monitoring settlement fails === |
|||
Selling short without arranging a hedge thereafter causes the settlement to fail; securities are not delivered, cash is not credited. The ‘fails-to-deliver’ (FTD), or simply ‘fails’, are most often fortuitous, incurred by a malfunction in the information system. |
|||
Every central securities depository has its own rules on fails: some let a timeframe to participants, so that they can rectify their situation, others offer a borrowing service, which can be costly, or compel the defaulting seller to buy in the securities on the market whatever the price. |
|||
Avoiding settlement fails is difficult: if the central depository conditions the unwinding of a sale to the presence of the shares on the seller’s book (as well as of the cash on the buyer’s), at settlement date, it has no knowledge of the sale at the very moment it is negotiated. At best it can find out, at the date it receives the instruction, by analyzing the [[Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] message, the date at which the seller declares he struck it. The CSD knows neither whether a fail is caused by a sale which was struck before or after the negotiation of a borrowing, nor whether that borrowing, if any, was effectively dedicated to that sale or not, nor whether such a sale constituted a market abuse under law; however this is not always understood, notably by those occasionally criticizing the [[Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation|DTCC]] (the US central depository), or the SEC, for not doing what it takes to prevent fails to occur.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118359867562957720-5Yb1Y_mpcl9a2nKbc0IaV0tDHyk_20070712.html |
|||
| date = 5 July 2007 |
|||
| publisher = [[The Wall Street Journal]] |
|||
| author = John R. Emshwiller, Kara Scannell |
|||
| title = Blame the 'Stock Vault'? Clearinghouse Faulted On Short-Selling Abuse; Finding the Naked Truth |
|||
| accessdate = 3 December 2010}}</ref>{{,}}<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.dtcc.com/news/press/releases/2007/wsj_response.php |
|||
| date = 6 July 2007 |
|||
| publisher = DTCC |
|||
| title = DTCC Responds to The Wall Street Journal article, "Blame the 'Stock Vault?'" |
|||
| accessdate = 3 December 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Most brokers will allow retail customers to borrow shares to short a stock only if one of their own customers has purchased the stock on [[Margin (finance)|margin]]. Brokers will go through the "locate" process outside their own firm to obtain borrowed shares from other brokers only for their large institutional customers. |
|||
===Investment strategies=== |
|||
Many hedge funds propose different kinds of investment strategies which have in common to specifically depend on the use of short-selling.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://aima-canada.org/doc_bin/Overview of Short Selling-v2 _2.pdf |
|||
| date = January 2007 |
|||
| publisher = Alternative Investment Management Association (Canada) |
|||
| title = An Overview of Short Stock Selling |
|||
| accessdate = 11 December 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Stock exchanges such as the [[NYSE]] or the [[NASDAQ]] typically report the "short interest" of a stock, which gives the number of shares that have been ''legally'' sold short as a percent of the total [[Float (finance)|float]]. Alternatively, these can also be expressed as the [[short interest ratio]], which is the number of shares ''legally'' sold short as a multiple of the average daily volume. These can be useful tools to spot trends in stock price movements but in order to be reliable, investors must also ascertain the number of shares brought into existence by naked shorters. Speculators are cautioned to remember that for every share that has been shorted (owned by a new owner), a 'shadow owner' exists (i.e. the original owner) who also is part of the universe of owners of that stock, i.e. Despite not having any voting rights, he has not relinquished his interest and some rights in that stock. |
|||
==== Arbitrage ==== |
|||
* arbitrage between a convertible and a stock: the fund buys a convertible bond whose implicit call option of the underlying stock looks undervalued, and sells the stock short to make an [[Convertible arbitrage|arbitraging profit]]; |
|||
* equity market-neutral arbitrage: a bet on the compared evolution of two companies of the same industry, or a of given company benchmarked against its industry, can give rise to a strategy linking the purchase of an equity or of an equity and the short-sale of another equity; |
|||
* merger arbitrage: with the prospect of an IPO of a company on another, a typical arbitrage is to buy the target stock and sell short the stock of the potential buyer, to make a profit when the IPO is completed; |
|||
* negative opinion: the fund manager sells short the stock of a company which he reckons is overvalued or which he believes can suffer from a large and damaging event (loss of a major customer, [[class-action suit]], regulatory reform, etc.) likely to make its price fall. |
|||
In general, these [[long/short equity]] strategies amount to take long positions on stocks for which the investor is bullish and short positions on stocks where is bearish. |
|||
Finally, short-selling can be motivated by tax reasons; in the US, for instance, an investor keen to speculate on a fall of a stock he has got in his portfolio can qualify a sale as short on the triple condition not to hedge that long position, to close out his short position within the last 30 days of the year, and to keep his long position for at least another 60 days beyond the close-out. The seller is then taxed on the profit made, not from the difference between the sale and the average cost of his long position, but from the buy-in of his short position.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.irs.gov/publications/p550/ch04.html#d0e8793 United States IRS Publication 550 Investment Income and Expenses |
|||
| publisher = US tax administration ([[Internal Revenue Service]]) |
|||
| title = United States IRS Publication 550 Investment Income and Expenses |
|||
| accessdate = 11 February 2012}}</ref> |
|||
=== Securities lending === |
|||
{{Main|Securities lending}} |
|||
{{Further|Hedge (finance)}} |
|||
Hedging often represents a means of minimizing the risk from a more complex set of transactions. |
|||
Examples of this are: |
|||
* A farmer who has just planted his wheat wants to lock in the price at which he can sell after the harvest. He would take a short position in wheat futures. |
|||
* A [[market maker]] in [[corporate bond]]s is constantly trading bonds when clients want to buy or sell. This can create substantial bond positions. The largest risk is that interest rates overall move. The trader can hedge this risk by selling government bonds short against his long positions in corporate bonds. In this way, the risk that remains is [[credit risk]] of the corporate bonds. |
|||
* an options trader may short shares in order to remain [[delta neutral]] so that he is not exposed to risk from price movements in the stocks that underlie his options. |
|||
When a security is sold, the seller is contractually obligated to deliver it to the buyer. If a seller sells a security short without owning it first, the seller needs to borrow the security from a third party to fulfill its obligation. Otherwise, the seller will "fail to deliver," the transaction will not [[settlement (finance)|settle]], and the seller may be subject to a claim from its [[counterparty]]. Certain large holders of securities, such as a [[custodian]] or [[investment management]] firm, often lend out these securities to gain extra income, a process known as [[securities lending]]. The lender receives a fee for this service. Similarly, retail investors can sometimes make an extra fee when their broker wants to borrow their securities. This is only possible when the investor has full [[title (property)|title]] of the security, so it cannot be used as collateral for [[margin buying]]. |
|||
== Costs and benefits to the market == |
|||
=== Benefits === |
|||
* By enlarging negotiation of a stock to sellers who do not hold it, short-selling improves that stock’s [[liquidity]], which in turn eases hedging. It is an essential part of the [[price discovery]] mechanism<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=281514 |
|||
| title = Short Sale Constraints And Stock Returns |
|||
| author = C.M Jones and O.A. Lamont |
|||
| publisher = Social Science Research Network |
|||
| date = August 2001 |
|||
| accessdate = 26 February 2012}}</ref> and is one of the [[market maker]]’s instruments. |
|||
=== Sources of short interest data === |
|||
* Short-selling is a useful counterweight to the widespread bullishness on stockmarkets; it dampens the formation of [[stock market bubble]]s, which ultimately correct into spectacular market crashes. The price of Chinese stocks, quoted on both the [[Shanghai]] and [[Hong Kong]] stock exchanges, tends to be higher in Shanghai, where shorting is prohibited, than in Hong Kong, where it is allowed.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.apjfs.org/conference/2010/cafm2010/3-1.pdf |
|||
| title = Effects of Short-sale Constraints on Stock Prices and Trading Activity: Evidence from Hong Kong and Mainland China |
|||
| author = Kalok Chan, Hung Wan Kot and Zhishu Yang |
|||
| publisher = Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies |
|||
| date = March 2010 |
|||
| accessdate = 11 February 2012}}</ref> |
|||
Time delayed short interest data (for ''legally'' shorted shares) is available in a number of countries, including the US, the UK, Hong Kong, and Spain. The amount of stocks being shorted on a global basis has increased in recent years for various structural reasons (e.g. the growth of [[130/30]] type strategies, short or bear ETFs). The data is typically delayed; for example, the NASDAQ requires its [[broker-dealer]] member firms to report data on the 15th of each month, and then publishes a compilation eight days later.<ref>NASDAQ. [http://www.nasdaq.com/quotes/short-interest.aspx About the Short Interest Page].</ref> |
|||
* It allows to inform the market of a possible [[fraud]] or accounting manipulation, when the information is not known from the moment investors, nor even detected by the financial watchdog. It allows the financial community to suppress bullish manipulation built on fake information.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://mises.org/daily/2527 |
|||
| title = Don't sell short selling short |
|||
| author = Gary Galles, professor of Economics with Pepperdine University |
|||
| publisher = Ludwig von Mises Institute |
|||
| accessdate = 21 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> An American hedge fund manager, [[David Einhorn (hedge fund manager)|David Einhorn]], has, for example, sold short the [[Lehman Brothers]] stock once he was convinced that provisions for impairment of the [[Collateralised debt obligation|CDO]] portfolio disclosed by that [[bulge bracket]] [[broker]] in July 2008 were largely insufficient. But drawing attention on accounting irregularities can also lead the regulator to freeze the stock quotation of the respondent corporation, and thereby jeopardize the interests of the very ones who warned the market, as American speculators learned to their cost, after having sold short Chinese stocks on the [[NYSE]] during the 2011 summer.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424053111904113704576383892664177456.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoobarrons |
|||
| title = Even Short Sellers Burned by Chinese Shares |
|||
| author = Bill Alpert |
|||
| date = 18 June 2011 |
|||
| publisher = [[Barron's (newspaper)|]] |
|||
| accessdate = 11 February 2012 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Some market data providers (like [[Data Explorers]] and SunGard Financial Systems<ref>SunGard's [http://www.sungard.com/financialsystems/products/shortsidecom.aspx ShortSide.com] discusses the product.</ref>) believe that stock lending data provides a good proxy for short interest levels (excluding any naked short interest). SunGard provides daily data on short interest by tracking the proxy variables based on borrowing and lending data which it collects.<ref>SunGard. [http://www.thefreelibrary.com/SunGard Launches Borrow Indices; First Proxy for Measuring Short...-a0123159715 SunGard Launches Borrow Indices; First Proxy for Measuring Short Interest on a Daily Basis]. Business Wire.</ref> |
|||
=== Costs === |
|||
* If outright purchase is conceptually symmetrical to short-selling, the average of price falls is higher than the average of price rises. It takes less time for [[panic]] to spread than for an asset bubble to swell. Short-selling therefore carries an aggravation risk of a [[financial crisis]]. |
|||
* A heavy price fall of a financial stock can trigger panic, not only among professionals, but also among small account holders, and can develop into a [[bank run]], according to [[Callum McCarthy]], chairman of the [[Financial Services Authority]].<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7624012.stm |
|||
| title = FSA introduces short-selling ban |
|||
| date = 19 September 2008 |
|||
| publisher = [[BBC]] |
|||
| accessdate = 14 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
* Short-selling can be the tool of [[market abuse]]: a seller who would not have the intention to do what it takes to have securities delivered on his account by the settlement date of his short sale, and therefore would deliberately cause a fail, would not only harm the buyer, but also deceive the market, insofar as the price negotiated for the sale has been broadcast to the market and may have enticed other participants into selling the stock. More serious still is the so-called [[short and distort]] practice which is to sell a stock short and then influence the market downward by spreading negative [[rumor]]s, launching a lawsuit, or requesting the regulator to make an audit of a targeted company; such an initiative, whether the root causes invoked are grounded or not, can be enough to draw downward the price of a stock, at least temporarily, and allow the short-seller to make a profit.<ref name="pollock">{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.wlf.org/upload/060206pollackLOL.pdf |
|||
| title = Financial interest disclosures can protect markets from "Short & Distort" manipulators |
|||
| date = 2 June 2006 |
|||
| publisher = Washington Legal Foundation |
|||
| author = Alex J. Pollock, professor at the [[American Enterprise Institute]] |
|||
| accessdate = 22 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
=== Short selling terms === |
||
'''Days to Cover (DTC)''' is a numerical term that describes the relationship between the amount of shares in a given equity that have been ''legally'' short sold and the number of days of typical trading that it would require to 'cover' all legal short positions outstanding. For example, if there are ten million shares of XYZ Inc. that are currently legally short sold and the average daily volume of XYZ shares traded each day is one million, it would require ten days of trading for all legal short positions to be covered (10 million / 1 million). |
|||
'''Short Interest''' is a numerical term that relates the number of shares in a given equity that have been legally shorted divided by the total shares outstanding for the company, usually expressed as a percent. For example, if there are ten million shares of XYZ Inc. that are currently legally short sold, and the total number of shares issued by the company is one hundred million, the Short Interest is 10% (10 million / 100 million). If however, shares are being created through naked short selling, "fails" data must be accessed to assess accurately the true level of short interest. |
|||
| url = http://www.economist.com/node/11591349?story_id=11591349 |
|||
| title = Nasty, brutish and short |
|||
| date = 19 June 2008 |
|||
| publisher = The Economist |
|||
| accessdate = 27 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> During the market downturn of the 2008 summer, this ratio had been staying in that order of magnitude for the three UK financial stocks whose price had fallen furthest: 2.8 % of the equity capital of HBOS, 1.4 % of Royal Bank of Scotland and 5 % of Barclays.<ref name="figaro">{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.lefigaro.fr/marches/2008/09/22/04003-20080922ARTWWW00707-la-vente-a-decouvert-accusee-de-tous-les-maux.php |
|||
| title = La vente à découvert accusée de tous les maux |
|||
| date = 22 September 2008 |
|||
| publisher = Le Figaro |
|||
| accessdate = 2 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> US regulation obliges NYSE and [[NASDAQ]] (but not [[multilateral trading facility|multilateral trading facilities]]) to aggregate short positions declared by instructing participants (the sale order must stipulate “sell” or “short sell”) and to publish them daily.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.nasdaq.com/quotes/short-interest.aspx |
|||
| title = About the Short Interest Page |
|||
| publisher = NASDAQ |
|||
| accessdate = 3 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
==== Major lenders ==== |
|||
* The '''long/short ratio''', published by the research firm Data Explorers,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
* [[Merrill Lynch]] (New Jersey) |
|||
| url = http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/06/long-short-ratio |
|||
* [[State Street Corporation]] (Boston) |
|||
| title = Long/short ratio |
|||
* [[JP Morgan Chase]] (New York) |
|||
| date = 29 juin 2011 |
|||
* [[Northern Trust]] (Chicago) |
|||
| publisher = The Economist |
|||
* [[Fortis (finance)|Fortis]] (Amsterdam, now defunct) |
|||
| accessdate = 26 February 2012 |
|||
* [[ABN AMRO]] (Amsterdam, Netherlands, formerly Fortis) |
|||
}}</ref> is the part of the outstanding lent to the total outstanding issued, and is used as a proxy of short-selling activity, which is generally funded by securities finance. |
|||
* [[Citibank]] (New York) |
|||
* [[Bank of New York Mellon|Bank of New York Mellon Corporation]] (New York) |
|||
* [[UBS AG]] (Zurich, Switzerland) |
|||
* [[Barclays]] (London, England) |
|||
===Naked short selling=== |
|||
Those indicators are however exact only provided all short-sellers publicize their sales to the market or the watchdog. |
|||
{{Main|Naked short selling}} |
|||
A naked short sale occurs when a security is sold short without borrowing the security within a set time, 3 days (T 3) in the US. This means that the buyer of such a short is buying the short-seller's promise to deliver a share, rather than buying the share itself. The short-seller's promise is known as a hypothecated share. |
|||
When the holder of the underlying stock receives a dividend, the holder of the hypothecated share would receive an equal dividend from the short seller. |
|||
== Perceptions of short selling == |
|||
Naked shorting has been made illegal except where allowed under limited circumstances by [[market maker]]s. It is detected by the [[Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation]] (in the US) as a "failure to deliver" or simply "fail.” While many fails are settled in a short time, some have been allowed to linger in the system. |
|||
Short-selling is largely linked to [[speculation]] in the collective consciousness. It is banned by [[Islam]]. A [[Malaysia]]n Minister of Finance has proposed to punish it with caning. In France, former Minister of Finance [[Michel Sapin]] compared it to [[gaming the system|gaming]]. |
|||
In the US, arranging to borrow a security before a short sale is called a ''[[Locate (finance)|locate]]''. In 2005, to prevent widespread failure to deliver securities, the [[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]] (SEC) put in place [[Regulation SHO]], intended to prevent speculators from selling some stocks short before doing a locate. Requirements that are more stringent were put in place in September 2008, ostensibly to prevent the practice from exacerbating market declines. The rules were made permanent in 2009. |
|||
At the height of the financial crisis in autumn 2008, after the financial watchdogs took a package of measures prohibiting or restricting short-selling, [[Reuters|the Reuters agency]] recalled, by the title, « Short-sellers have been the villain for 400 years »,<ref name="villain">{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE48P7CS20080926?PageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true |
|||
| title = Short-sellers have been the villain for 400 years |
|||
| date = 26 September 2008 |
|||
| author = Daniel Trotta |
|||
| publisher = Reuters |
|||
| accessdate = 30 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> that criticism levelled at them occur anew on each crisis: that was the case during the [[panic of 1907]], referred to earlier, the [[1929 Depression]], of course, after [[Black Monday (1987)]] and the [[September 11 attacks]]. |
|||
== Fees == |
|||
Already under the [[First French Empire]], [[Napoleon]] suspected short-sellers to undermine his policy.<ref name=slate>{{cite web |
|||
When a broker facilitates the delivery of a client's short sale, the client is charged a fee for this service, usually a standard commission similar to that of purchasing a similar security. |
|||
| url = http://www.slate.fr/story/28149/vente-nue-decouvert-bourses |
|||
| title = Je vous la vends "nue à découvert" ?»< |
|||
| date = 6 October 2010 |
|||
| publisher = Slate.fr |
|||
| author = Diogène |
|||
| accessdate = 30 November 2010}}</ref> He passed a law that made them liable to imprisonment for one year. |
|||
More recently, bosses of [[Tyco International]], [[Enron]], [[WorldCom]], [[Bear Stearns]] or Lehman Brothers have alternately vilified the "manipulators" who spread false rumors after selling short the shares of their company, before it goes bust or is taken over by a competitor. But no investigation of the SEC has proved their case and no judicial court has ruled in their favor. |
|||
In each case, it is recalled that the short seller sells shares he does not have, a turn most often legally inaccurate,<ref>in most jurisdictions, the borrowing of securities, which presumably precedes shorting, constitutes a transfer of [[property]]</ref> but which casts suspicion on his motives. « He that sells what isn't his'n must buy it back or go to prison », said [[Daniel Drew]], a 19th century US speculator. The press often describes the short seller as a "profiteer", a "scavenger",<ref name=chiasson>{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.ledevoir.com/economie/actualites-economiques/214045/doit-on-bannir-les-ventes-a-decouvert |
|||
| title = Doit-on bannir les ventes à découvert? |
|||
| author = Claude Chiasson |
|||
| publisher = Le devoir |
|||
| date = 4 November 2008 |
|||
| accessdate = 27 February 2011 |
|||
}}</ref> an "infringer"<ref>In the United States, the DTCC’s information system is designed in such a way that the lender of securities still technically holds his voting rights during a general assembly as well as the short-seller, who borrowed them; hence the debate, specific to the country, where short-selling is sometimes described as a kind of [[counterfeit]]; for more on this, read{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wall-streets-naked-swindle-20100405?page=4 |
|||
| title = Wall Street's Naked Swindle |
|||
| date = 5 April 2010 |
|||
| author = [[Matt Taibbi]] |
|||
| accessdate = 26 February 2011 |
|||
| publisher = Rolling Stone}}</ref>" or a « [[fraud]]ster ». |
|||
If the short position begins to move against the holder of the short position (i.e., the price of the security begins to rise), money will be removed from the holder's cash balance and moved to his or her margin balance. If short shares continue to rise in price, and the holder does not have sufficient funds in the cash account to cover the position, the holder will begin to borrow on margin for this purpose, thereby accruing margin interest charges. These are computed and charged just as for any other margin debit. Therefore, only margin accounts can be used to open a short position. |
|||
[[John J. Mack]], CEO of [[Morgan Stanley]], pointed to short sellers, the day after a fall of nearly 25% of the share price of his company, and called upon the authorities to stop these "irresponsible" movements which have no "rational basis".<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2008/09/morgan_stanleys_john_mack_swings_into_action.html |
|||
| title = Morgan Stanley's John Mack Swings Into Action |
|||
| date = 17 September 2008 |
|||
| publisher = Bloomberg BusinessWeek |
|||
| author = Emily Thornton |
|||
| accessdate = 1 December 2010}}</ref> |
|||
When a security's [[ex-dividend date]] passes, the dividend is deducted from the shortholder's account and paid to the person from whom the stock is borrowed. |
|||
These perceptions are occasionally shared by politicians and regulators. |
|||
For some brokers, the short seller may not earn interest on the proceeds of the short sale or use it to reduce outstanding margin debt. These brokers may not pass this benefit on to the retail client unless the client is very large. The interest is often split with the lender of the security. |
|||
In the public debate that followed the demise of Bear Stearns, US senator [[Chris Dodd]] pointed to short sellers, saying « This goes beyond rumors. This is about collusion ».<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/30/business/30shorts.html?_r=1 |
|||
| title = A New Wave of Vilifying Short Sellers |
|||
| author = Jenny Anderson |
|||
| date = 30 April 2008 |
|||
| publisher = New York Times |
|||
| accessdate = 1 December 2010}}</ref> |
|||
== Dividends and voting rights == |
|||
Several months later, while the [[stock market]] was in turmoil, commenting restrictions ruled by the SEC, its chairman [[Christopher Cox]] spoke of « false rumors », of « unlawful manipulation through 'naked' short selling that threatens the stability of financial institutions »<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-143.htm |
|||
| title = SEC Enhances Investor Protections Against Naked Short Selling |
|||
| date = 15 July 2008 |
|||
| publisher = SEC |
|||
| accessdate = 1 December 2010}}</ref> and of the "zero tolerance" of the Commission.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-210.htm |
|||
| title = Statement From SEC Chairman Christopher Cox |
|||
| date = 18 September 2008 |
|||
| publisher = SEC |
|||
| accessdate = 1 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> The sharp fall in share prices of the financial sector would be attributable to market manipulation made possible by a regulatory loophole; borrowing securities "after" rather than "before", their short sale, definition of 'naked short-selling' used by the U.S. regulator, would be the cause, if one follows this reasoning, of the destabilization of the market. In September 2008, President [[George W. Bush|George Bush]] stated, in a slip of the tongue, that short-sellers would be « persecuted », while he probably meant « prosecuted ».<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.crossingwallstreet.com/archives/2008/09/bush-anyone-engaging-in-illegal-financial-transactions-will-be-caught-and-persecuted.html |
|||
| title = Anyone engaging in illegal financial transactions will be caught and persecuted |
|||
| date = 24 September 2008 |
|||
| publisher = Crossing Wall Street |
|||
| accessdate = 26 February 2012}}</ref> |
|||
Where shares have been shorted and the company which issues the shares distributes a dividend, the question arises as to who receives the dividend. The new buyer of the shares, who is the "holder of record" and holds the shares outright, will receive the dividend from the company. However, the lender, who may hold its shares in a [[margin account]] with a [[prime broker]] and is unlikely to be aware that these particular shares are being lent out for shorting, also expects to receive a dividend. The short seller will therefore pay to the lender an amount equal to the dividend in order to compensate, though as this payment does not come from the company it is not technically a dividend as such. The short seller is therefore said to be "short the dividend". |
|||
The image of the short-seller is closely associated, in the public opinion, to that of a hedge fund, a predator, in particular since the 2000s (decade), when some high-profile European companies were targeted by mostly US or UK-based hedge funds. In 2005, [[Franz Müntefering]], number two of the first [[Angela Merkel|Merkel]] cabinet, had compared hedge funds to [[locust]]s, an expression that remained. So, when [[Porsche]] maneuvers around [[Volkswagen]] made them lose huge sums on their short sales, the media feel they tasted their own medicine, like British newspaper "The Telegraph", which ran the headline on a Germany that « got revenge on the locusts ».<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/transport/3281537/Porsche-and-VW-share-row-how-Germany-got-revenge-on-the-hedge-fund-locusts.html |
|||
| title = Porsche and VW share row: how Germany got revenge on the hedge fund 'locusts' |
|||
| date = 29 October 2008 |
|||
| publisher = The Telegraph |
|||
| author = Gordon Raynor |
|||
| accessdate = 2 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
A similar issue comes up with the voting rights attached to the shorted shares. Unlike a dividend, voting rights cannot legally be synthesized and so the buyer of the shorted share, as the holder of record, controls the voting rights. The owner of a margin account from which the shares were lent will have agreed in advance to relinquish voting rights to shares during the period of any short sale.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/shortsalevotingrights.asp|title= What happens to the voting rights on shares when the shares are used in a short sale transaction?|accessdate=4 December 2008 |publisher= Investopedia}}</ref> |
|||
== Public action against short-selling since 2008 == |
|||
As noted earlier, victims of Naked Shorting attacks sometimes report that the number of votes cast is greater than the number of shares issued by the company.<ref>{{cite web|author=Greg LandContactAll Articles |url=http://www.law.com/jsp/law/LawArticleFriendly.jsp?id=1202430726911 |title=Over-voting at Taser in 2005 |publisher=Law.com |date=2009-05-15 |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
=== Bans === |
|||
Most countries with a developed financial market have implemented temporary short-selling bans since the summer of 2008. In July, the SEC banned the sole « naked » short-selling on 19 financial institutions,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = SEC Enhances Investor Protections Against Naked Short Selling |
|||
| date = 15 July 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-143.htm |
|||
| publisher = SEC |
|||
| accessdate = 9 December 2010}}</ref>{{,}}<ref name="nakedtruth">{{cite web |
|||
| title = Searching for the naked truth - The real problem with abusive short-selling |
|||
| date = 17 August 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.economist.com/node/11951246 |
|||
| publisher = The Economist |
|||
| accessdate = 29 November 2010}}</ref> then in September, any short sale, whether naked or not, on 799 financial institutions for a 3 week period.<ref name="sec-211">{{cite web |
|||
| title = SEC Halts Short Selling of Financial Stocks to Protect Investors and Markets |
|||
| date = 19 September 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-211.htm |
|||
| publisher = SEC |
|||
| accessdate = 19 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> In the days that followed, most European countries followed suit. [[Australia]] decided the same restriction, but in including non-financial stocks.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = Australian short selling ban goes further than other bourses |
|||
| publisher = The National Business Review |
|||
| date = 22 September 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/australian-short-selling-ban-goes-further-other-bourses-35494 |
|||
| accessdate = 19 November 2010}}</ref> According to the [[Nomura Research Institute]], it is [[Japan]] that applies the most stringent provisions.<ref name="nri">{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/lakyara/2009/pdf/lkr200948.pdf |
|||
| title = The folly of demonizing short-selling |
|||
| publisher = Nomura Research Institute |
|||
| date = 10 January 2009 |
|||
| accessdate = 5 February 2012}}</ref> |
|||
== Markets == |
|||
If it was determined that short sales represented a significant share of trading volumes, and though the rise in outstanding fails,<ref name="nakedtruth" /> in the United States, was a real concern of the authorities in recent years, there was no evidence that short-selling, naked or not, had caused or exacerbated the financial crisis. |
|||
=== Futures and options contracts === |
|||
These measures bore a sense of panic. The SEC chairman admitted in an interview that Treasury Secretary [[Henry Paulson]] and [[Federal Reserve]] chairman [[Ben Bernanke]] were pressuring him, arguing that if they did not act in the moment, it would be fatal to financial institutions and that there would be nothing left to save.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
When trading [[futures contract]]s, being 'short' means having the legal obligation to deliver something at the expiration of the contract, although the holder of the short position may alternately buy back the contract prior to expiration instead of making delivery. Short futures transactions are often used by producers of a commodity to fix the future price of goods they have not yet produced. Shorting a futures contract is sometimes also used by those holding the underlying asset (i.e. those with a long position) as a temporary hedge against price declines. Shorting futures may also be used for speculative trades, in which case the investor is looking to profit from any decline in the price of the futures contract prior to expiration. |
|||
| url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/23/AR2008122302765.html?sid=ST2008122302866&s_pos= |
|||
| title = SEC Chief Defends His Restraint - Cox Rebuffs Criticism of Leadership During Crisis |
|||
| date = 24 December 2008 |
|||
| publisher = [[The Washington Post]] |
|||
| author = Amit Paley, David Hilzenrath |
|||
| accessdate = 4 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> He added later on that, should the same crisis happen, he would not do it again.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE4BU3FL20081231?pageNumber=1 |
|||
| title = SEC chief has regrets over short-selling ban |
|||
| date = 31 December 2008 |
|||
| publisher = Reuters |
|||
| author = Rachelle Younglai |
|||
| accessdate = 4 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
An investor can also purchase a put option, giving that investor the right (but not the obligation) to sell the underlying asset (such as shares of stock) at a fixed price. In the event of a market decline, the option holder may exercise these put options, obliging the counterparty to buy the underlying asset at the agreed upon (or "strike") price, which would then be higher than the current quoted spot price of the asset. |
|||
With hindsight, however, these measures remained defensible under a [[precautionary principle]]. Depriving the market of short sales could have acted as a [[circuit breaker]] (although it was not the case). But this argument was barely advanced; it is easier to lay a blame on someone than to admit one's gropings to a worried public opinion. |
|||
=== Currency === |
|||
Going against this trend, [[China]] considers, for its part, allowing short-selling along other financial techniques.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
Selling short on the currency markets is different from selling short on the stock markets. Currencies are traded in pairs, each currency being priced in terms of another. In this way, selling short on the currency markets is identical to going long on stocks. |
|||
| url = http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303601504575153560092271360.html |
|||
| title = China Rolls Out Margin Trading, Short Selling |
|||
| date = 31 March 2010 |
|||
| publisher = The Wall Street Journal |
|||
| author = Shen Hong |
|||
| accessdate = 4 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Novice traders or stock traders can be confused by the failure to recognize and understand this point: a [[contract]] is always long in terms of one medium and short another. |
|||
===Disclosure requirements=== |
|||
At the same time they pronounced their temporary bans, stock exchange authorities of the United States, Great Britain,<ref name="FSA-102">{{cite web |
|||
| title = FSA statement on short positions in financial stocks |
|||
| work = Financial Services Authority (FSA) |
|||
| date = 18 September 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2008/102.shtml |
|||
| accessdate = 19 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> [[France]],<ref>{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.senat.fr/rap/l09-703-1/l09-703-129.html#toc218 |
|||
| title = Projet de loi de régulation bancaire et financière, chapitre II, article 2 bis, Octroi de pouvoirs d'urgence à l'Autorité des marchés financiers |
|||
| work = French Senate |
|||
| date = 14 September 2008 |
|||
| accessdate = 4 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref>{{,}}<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.amf-france.org/documents/general/8421_1.pdf |
|||
| title = Ventes à découvert: Interdiction des transactions non sécurisées et transparence des positions courtes sur titres du secteur financier |
|||
| work = le site de l'AMF |
|||
| date = 19 September 2008 |
|||
| accessdate = 21 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> of [[Spain]],<ref name="spa-220908">{{es}} {{cite web |
|||
| title = La CNMV también estrecha el cerco a las posiciones bajistas |
|||
| publisher = Expansión |
|||
| date = 22 September 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.expansion.com/2008/09/22/inversion/1167625.html |
|||
| accessdate = 19 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> [[Belgium]] and the [[Netherlands]], made it mandatory to report to the regulator or to disclose to the market any short position bigger than 0.25 % of the equity capital of listed financial companies. |
|||
The procedure is based on a disclosure obligation, not on a computer analysis of exchange-traded orders or instructions processed by the central depository, which would be very complicated and expensive to implement. The idea is anyway less to reveal the existence of market abuse than to discourage participants to commit any.<ref name="pollock" /> Anyone disseminating negative information after publishing a short position would betray his intentions, and anyone abstaining from publishing would be liable to stiff penalties. Hedge funds fear however that such a device raises frivolous legal actions from business leaders disgruntled to realize they are shorted.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = Regulators move to stop some short selling |
|||
| publisher = New York Times |
|||
| date = 19 September 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/business/worldbusiness/19iht-sell.4.16317673.html |
|||
| accessdate = 5 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
When the exchange rate has changed, the trader buys the first currency again; this time he gets more of it, and pays back the loan. Since he got more money than he had borrowed initially, he makes money. Of course, the reverse can also occur. |
|||
The idea of reporting volumes and prices of securities borrowing trades is also addressed. The regulator would be warned in this way of tensions on the securities finance market.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = L'AMF compte accroître ses exigences sur les ventes à découvert |
|||
| publisher = L'Agéfi |
|||
| author = Tân Le Quang |
|||
| date = 24 February 2009 |
|||
| url = http://www.agefi.fr/articles/LAMF-compte-accroitre-exigences-ventes-decouvert-1061890.html |
|||
| accessdate = 9 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
An example of this is as follows: Let us say a trader wants to trade with the [[US dollar]] and the [[Indian rupee]] currencies. Assume that the current market rate is USD 1 to Rs.50 and the trader borrows Rs.100. With this, he buys USD 2. If the next day, the conversion rate becomes USD 1 to Rs.51, then the trader sells his USD 2 and gets Rs.102. He returns Rs.100 and keeps the Rs.2 profit (minus fees). |
|||
The [[European commission]] seeks to harmonize the rules adopted by its member states. A directive being prepared could retain the 0.2% threshold to entail mandatory notification to the market authority, and the 0.5% one to entail disclosure to the market.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= |
|||
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/securities/docs/short_selling/20100915_proposal_en.pdf |
|||
| title = Proposal for a regulation of the [[European parliament]] and the Council on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps |
|||
| date = 15 September 2010 |
|||
| work = European parliament |
|||
| accessdate = 29 January 2011 |
|||
}}</ref>{{,}}<ref>{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.senat.fr/rap/l09-703-1/l09-703-150.html#toc250 |
|||
| title = Rapport du Sénat français sur le projet de loi de régulation bancaire et financière, chapitre II, article 7 quater, Limitation des ventes à découvert et réduction du délai de règlement-livraison des titres |
|||
| date = 14 September 2010 |
|||
| work = the French Senate |
|||
| accessdate = 22 November 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
One may also take a short position in a currency using futures or options; the preceding method is used to bet on the spot price, which is more directly analogous to selling a stock short. |
|||
== The public debate on restrictions on short selling == |
|||
=== The case for restrictions === |
|||
==== A moral issue ==== |
|||
== Risks == |
|||
Many people, in Europe and North America, believe that short selling should be, in principle, suppressed, or at least restricted. |
|||
{{Refimprove|date=April 2009}} |
|||
[[Robert Goebbels]], [[Member of the European Parliament]] and member of the Commission of Economic Affairs, believes that naked short selling is "immoral" and "scandalous".<ref>{{cite web |
|||
'''Note: this section does not apply to currency markets.''' |
|||
| url = http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20100223IPR69353 0 DOC XML V0//EN |
|||
| title = Hedge funds directive: MEPs start scrutiny of draft legislation |
|||
| date = 23 February 2010 |
|||
| work = European parliament |
|||
| accessdate = 1 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> [[Arnaud Montebourg]], a [[French Socialist Party]] [[Member of Parliament|MP]], sees « a symbol of the [[casino]] economy which must be defeated ».<ref>{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.desideesetdesreves.fr/content/interdire-tout-ou-partie-des-ventes-decouvert |
|||
| title = Cent propositions - Interdire tout ou partie des ventes à découvert |
|||
| work = Des Idées et des rêves |
|||
| accessdate = 27 February 2011 |
|||
}}</ref> In [[Canada]], Claude Chiasson, a columnist for [[Le Devoir]], laments "a perverse process" by which the long-term investor acts against its interests by lending its securities to a borrower who will sell them, and denounces the right of a [[broker]], in North America, to have its investor clients sign a clause permitting it to lend their securities at any time, therefore, somehow, without their knowledge.<ref name=chiasson /> |
|||
Short selling is sometimes referred to as a "negative income investment strategy" because there is no potential for dividend income or interest income. Stock is held only long enough to be sold pursuant to the contract, and one's return is therefore limited to short term [[capital gains]], which are taxed as ordinary income. For this reason, buying shares (called "going long") has a very different [[risk]] profile from selling short. Furthermore, a "long's" losses are limited because the price can only go down to zero, but [[gain]]s are not, as there is no limit, in theory, on how high the price can go. On the other hand, the short seller's possible gains are limited to the original price of the stock, which can only go down to zero, whereas the loss potential, again in theory, has no limit. For this reason, short selling probably is most often used as a [[hedge (finance)|hedge]] strategy to manage the risks of long investments. |
|||
==== The circuit-breaker ==== |
|||
Proponents of restrictions see them as a way to thwart a speculation that could accelerate the fall of equity markets. Enacting an uptick rule or an outright ban helps to deter market abuses, instead of having to punish them after they have caused damage. |
|||
Many short sellers place a "[[stop order]]" with their stockbroker after selling a stock short. This is an order to the brokerage to cover the position if the price of the stock should rise to a certain level, in order to limit the loss and avoid the problem of unlimited liability described above. In some cases, if the stock's price skyrockets, the stockbroker may decide to cover the short seller's position immediately and without his consent, in order to guarantee that the short seller will be able to make good on his debt of shares. |
|||
==== Restoring trust ==== |
|||
This argument was raised early in the financial crisis. The SEC Chairman linked naked short selling and the risk of loss of confidence as soon as 15 July 2008.<ref name="nakedfear" /> If the causal relationship between the level of fails and the price fall is not proven, temporary bans on short-selling did reassure investors. These emergency measures were the signal sent to the public opinion that the situation was under control. The [[Los Angeles Times]], for example, was pleased to see the SEC « flex its muscles ».<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = SEC muscle, finally |
|||
| publisher = The Los Angeles Times |
|||
| date = 17 July 2008 |
|||
| url = http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/17/opinion/ed-sec17 |
|||
| accessdate = 6 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Short sellers must be aware of the potential for a [[short squeeze]]. When the price of a stock rises significantly, some people who are shorting the stock will cover their positions to limit their losses (this may occur in an automated way if the short sellers had stop-loss orders in place with their brokers); others may be forced to close their position to meet a [[margin call]]; others may be forced to cover, subject to the terms under which they borrowed the stock, if the person who lent the stock wishes to sell and take a profit. Since covering their positions involves buying shares, the short squeeze causes an ever further rise in the stock's price, which in turn may trigger additional covering. Because of this, most short sellers restrict their activities to heavily traded stocks, and they keep an eye on the "short interest" levels of their short investments. Short interest is defined as the total number of shares that have been ''legally'' sold short, but not covered. A short squeeze can be deliberately induced. This can happen when large investors (such as companies or wealthy individuals) notice significant short positions, and buy many shares, with the intent of selling the position at a profit to the short sellers who will be panicked by the initial uptick or who are forced to cover their short positions in order to avoid margin calls. |
|||
==== Defending jobs and business ==== |
|||
Banning short selling, not temporarily but permanently, is an argument in favor of protecting businesses and employees. In a survey conducted in October 2008, 60% of U.S. business leaders responded that short selling was harmful to the economy.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/ShortSellingStudy10212008.pdf |
|||
| title = Short Selling Study: The Views of Corporate Issuers |
|||
| work = NYSE Euronext |
|||
| date = 17 October 2008 |
|||
| accessdate = 6 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Another risk is that a given stock may become "hard to borrow." As defined by the SEC and based on lack of availability, a broker may charge a hard to borrow fee daily, without notice, for any day that the SEC declares a share is hard to borrow. Additionally, a broker may be required to cover a short seller's position at any time ("buy in"). The short seller receives a warning from the broker that he is "failing to deliver" stock, which will lead to the buy-in.<ref>{{cite web|last=Arnold |first=Roger |url=http://www.thestreet.com/story/862233/1/knowing-the-rules-of-the-shorting-game.html |title=Knowing the Rules of the Shorting Game |publisher=TheStreet |date=2000-01-14 |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
In France, the center-right MP Stéphane Demilly said that short selling was "inherently unhealthy"; "there is no question [it] has helped accelerate the global financial crisis [...] Listed companies and their employees suffer from it, with the collateral social damage that we know".<ref name=an>{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q13/13-427QOSD.htm |
|||
| title = Q&A session |
|||
| date = 9 December 2008 |
|||
| work = the French National Assembly |
|||
| accessdate = 1 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Because short sellers must deliver the shorted securities to their broker eventually, and will need money to buy them, there is a credit risk for the broker. The penalties for failure to deliver on a short selling contract inspired financier [[Daniel Drew]] to warn: "He who sells what isn't his'n, Must buy it back or go to pris'n." To manage its own risk, the broker requires the short seller to keep a [[margin (finance)|margin]] account, and charges interest of between 2% and 8% depending on the amounts involved.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.scottrade.com/online-brokerage/interest-margin-rates.html | work=ScotTrade | title=margin account rates schedule | date=2011-06-18}}</ref> |
|||
On the [[foreign exchange market]], a restriction to sell a foreign currency short, by a [[central bank]], like that of [[Brazil]] in 2011,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/09/brazil-forex-idUSN1E7671YO20110709 |
|||
| title = Brazil tightens limit on dollar short selling |
|||
| date = 8 July 2011 |
|||
| work = Reuters |
|||
| accessdate = 4 February 2012 |
|||
}}</ref> helps to thwart a rise of the local currency, which harms the country’s exporters. |
|||
In 2011, the eruption of the massive [[Securities fraud|China stock frauds]] on North American equity markets brought a related risk to light for the short seller. The efforts of research-oriented short sellers to expose these frauds eventually prompted NASDAQ, NYSE and other exchanges to impose sudden, lengthy [[trading halt]]s that froze the values of shorted stocks at artificially high values. Reportedly in some instances, brokers charged short sellers excessively large amounts of interest based on these high values as the shorts were forced to continue their borrowings at least until the halts were lifted.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424053111904113704576383892664177456.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoobarrons | work=Barrons | title=Even Short-Sellers Burned by Chinese Shares | date=2011-06-18}}</ref> |
|||
==== Defending the interests of small investors ==== |
|||
Prohibiting short selling would be an indirect way to have an unregulated industry melt down, that of hedge funds, which heavily relies on this technique. Small investors, and shareholders of mutual funds, that are properly regulated, would no longer see their portfolio performance lessened by the unfair advantage enjoyed by hedge funds.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = https://circabc.europa.eu/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/881ab1d6-a2bc-4383-8d36-88bf92c6b901/john_chapman_en.pdf |
|||
| title = Response from John Chapman, financial journalist, to the public consultation by the European Commission on short-selling |
|||
| date = 10 July 2010 |
|||
| work = European Commission |
|||
| accessdate = 11 February 2012 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Short sellers tend to temper overvaluation by selling into exuberance. Likewise, short sellers are said to provide price support by buying when negative sentiment is exacerbated after a significant price decline. Short selling can have negative implications if it causes a premature or unjustified share price collapse when the fear of cancellation due to bankruptcy becomes contagious.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=pwXWZzxXxfwC&pg=PP7&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1#PPA253,M1 |title=The Theory and Practice of Short Selling, Chapter 9, Conclusions and Implications for Investors by Frank J. Fabozzi, Editor |publisher=Books.google.com |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
=== The case against restrictions === |
|||
==== Dubious causality ==== |
|||
The main argument of opponents is that restrictions are groundless: short sales are not the cause of the crisis, and restrictions are not the answer to the crisis. For Professor Asquith, there is no academic evidence that short sellers were able to drive a company into bankruptcy without other underlying reason.<ref name="villain" /> Instead, according to Professor Owen Lamont, companies attacked by short sellers appear in retrospect as overvalued;<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = Don't shoot the messenger - Although it is under fire, short-selling should be encouraged |
|||
| publisher = The Economist |
|||
| date = 27 February 2003 |
|||
| url = http://www.economist.com/node/1608932 |
|||
| accessdate = 5 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> short sales are not a priori evidence of market abuse. |
|||
== Strategies == |
|||
Moreover, according to a team of researchers at the [[University of Zurich]], a chronological analysis of share prices and short positions in these shares suggest, not that falling prices are the "consequence" of short-selling but, rather, that they are its "cause".<ref>{{cite web |
|||
=== Hedging === |
|||
| title = Short Selling Regulation after the Financial Crisis – First Principles Revisited |
|||
{{See|Hedge (finance)}} |
|||
| date = 24 July 2009 |
|||
Hedging often represents a means of minimizing the risk from a more complex set of transactions. |
|||
| work = University of Zurich |
|||
Examples of this are: |
|||
| publisher = Swiss Financial Institute |
|||
* A farmer who has just planted his wheat wants to lock in the price at which he can sell after the harvest. He would take a short position in wheat futures. |
|||
| author = Seraina Grünewald, Alexander Wagner, Rolf Weber |
|||
* A [[market maker]] in [[corporate bond]]s is constantly trading bonds when clients want to buy or sell. This can create substantial bond positions. The largest risk is that interest rates overall move. The trader can hedge this risk by selling government bonds short against his long positions in corporate bonds. In this way, the risk that remains is [[credit risk]] of the corporate bonds. |
|||
| url = http://www.ufsp.uzh.ch/finance/documents/SSRN-id2.pdf |
|||
* an options trader may short shares in order to remain [[delta neutral]] so that he is not exposed to risk from price movements in the stocks that underlie his options |
|||
| accessdate = 12 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> Another study suggests, however, that the short seller makes a better interpretation of publicly available information on a company.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| title = How Shorts are informed? Short-sellers, news, and information processing |
|||
| date = 15 July 2010 |
|||
| work = University of North Carolina |
|||
| publisher = Social Science Research Network |
|||
| author = Joseph E. Engelberg, Adam V. Reed, Matthew C. Ringgenberg |
|||
| url = http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1535337 |
|||
| accessdate = 12 November 2011 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
=== Arbitrage === |
|||
That short sales be made without prior loan is not more damaging, they are responsible for only a small portion of outstanding fails, around 6%, for example, of the value of Canadian stocks according to a study.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
{{See|Arbitrage}} |
|||
| title = No evidence of excessive failed trades on Canadian marketplaces: study |
|||
A short seller may be trying to benefit from market inefficiencies arising from the mispricing of certain products. Examples of this are |
|||
| date = 27 April 2007 |
|||
* An arbitrageur who buys long futures contracts on a [[Treasury security|US Treasury security]], and sells short the underlying [[Treasury security|US Treasury security]]. |
|||
| publisher = Investment Executive |
|||
| author = James Langton |
|||
| url = http://www.investmentexecutive.com/client/en/News/DetailNews.asp?Id=38819&cat=8&IdSection=8&PageMem=&nbNews=&IdPub= |
|||
| accessdate = 8 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> And the total shorted outstanding position, of about 1% of market capitalization, cannot cause an acceleration of falling prices. |
|||
=== Against the box === |
|||
One variant of selling short involves a long position. "Selling short against the box" consists of holding a long position on which the shares have already risen, whereupon one then enters a short sell order for an equal amount of shares. The term ''box'' alludes to the days when a [[safe deposit box]] was used to store (long) shares. The purpose of this technique is to lock in paper profits on the long position without having to sell that position (and possibly incur taxes if said position has appreciated). Once the short position has been entered, it serves to balance the long position taken earlier. Thus, from that point in time, the profit is locked in (less brokerage fees and short financing costs), regardless of further fluctuations in the underlying share price. For example, one can ensure a profit in this way, while delaying sale until the subsequent tax year. |
|||
Many market professionals believe that the bans are futile or unnecessary. The Nomura Research Institute notes that restrictions on short selling implemented in Japan since 2008 have not boosted share prices, and recalls that the taxation of futures contracts on the [[Nikkei 225]], that had been decided in 1990 to that same effect, had not either.<ref name="nri" /> |
|||
U.S. investors considering entering into a "short against the box" transaction should be aware of the tax consequences of this transaction. Unless certain conditions are met, the IRS deems a "short against the box" position to be a "constructive sale" of the long position, which is a taxable event. These conditions include a requirement that the short position be closed out within 30 days of the end of the year and that the investor must hold their long position, without entering into any hedging strategies, for a minimum of 60 days after the short position has been closed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irs.gov/publications/p550/ch04.html#d0e8793 |title=United States IRS Publication 550 Investment Income and Expenses |publisher=Irs.gov |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
In May 2010, the German government's decision to ban short sales of euro-denominated debt listed in Germany is especially criticized, because market-makers are exempt of it and that the Greek debt, then attacked, is actually listed elsewhere (the measure will be quietly withdrawn two months later). Even [[Jean-Pierre Jouyet]], president of the [[Autorité des marchés financiers (France)|AMF]], "doubts the effectiveness of the prohibition of Berlin".<ref>{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.news-banques.com/ventes-a-decouvert-jouyet-doute-de-lefficacite-de-linterdiction-de-berlin/012131488/ |
|||
| title = Ventes à découvert: Jouyet doute de l'efficacité de l'interdiction de Berlin |
|||
| work = News-Banques.com |
|||
| date = 21 may 2010 |
|||
| accessdate = 6 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
== The regulatory response == |
|||
And a ban without exemptions can still be circumvented, either by selling short in a market where it does not apply, either by buying [[put option]]s on a futures market, either by selling a futures contract stock index. The investor can circumvent a ban on financial stocks by selling an index futures and buying non-financial stocks making up this index. |
|||
Finally, to supporters of a return, in the United States, or an introduction, in Europe, of the uptick rule, critics point out that decades of application of this device have not proved useful. |
|||
In the US, [[Regulation SHO]] was the SEC's first update to short selling restrictions since 1938. It established "locate" and "close-out" requirements{{Clarify|date=March 2011}} for broker-dealers, in an effort to curb [[naked short selling]]. Compliance with the regulation began on January 3, 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/keyregshoissues.htm |title=Division of Market Regulation: Key Points about Regulation SHO|date=April 11, 2005|author=U.S. SEC}}</ref> |
|||
==== Selectivity and asymmetry ==== |
|||
By taking an ironic distortion of the symbol of the SEC,"Selective Enforcement Commission",<ref name="nakedfear">{{cite web |
|||
| title = Naked fear - Regulators have yet to justify their restrictions on short sales |
|||
| publisher = The Economist |
|||
| date = 24 July 2008 |
|||
| url = http://www.economist.com/node/11791505 |
|||
| accessdate = 5 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> [[The Economist]] notes that bans are almost always on financial stocks, while there is no evidence that they are more prone to naked short selling than industrial stocks. But bank executives are more influential than those of the industry with the SEC and the Treasury and it is not even granted that the first ban, on 19 stocks, would have been enforced if two of them, [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]] had not been subject to rumors of impending [[bankruptcy]]. Besides, the magazine asks, why should a bet on a price fall harm the economy more than one on a price increase with the risk of a speculative bubble? This asymmetry of treatment does not protect the investor, instead it is misleading, and the regulator is out of his role. |
|||
In the US, [[initial public offering]]s (IPOs) cannot be sold short for a month after they start trading. This mechanism is in place to ensure a degree of price stability during a company's initial trading period. However, some [[brokerage firm]]s that specialize in [[penny stock]]s (referred to colloquially as [[bucket shop (stock market)|bucket shops]]) have used the lack of short selling during this month to [[pump and dump]] thinly traded [[IPO]]s. [[Canada]] and other countries do allow selling IPOs (including U.S. IPOs) short. |
|||
==== Side effects ==== |
|||
Many professionals believe that decisions were not only unnecessary but also undesirable. [[Xavier Rolet]], chairman of the [[London Stock Exchange|LSE]], reckons they are « counterproductive ».<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/lse-chief-attacks-shortselling-ban-as-misguided-and-counterproductive-1987587.html |
|||
| title = LSE chief attacks short-selling ban as 'misguided' and 'counterproductive' |
|||
| date = 31 may 2010 |
|||
| work = [[The independent]] |
|||
| author = James Moore |
|||
| accessdate = 4 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> Some believe that it is the politicians and regulators who have communicated their anxiety to the market.<ref name="nakedfear" /> The ban on the debt in euro decided by Germany in 2010, unilaterally, and to the surprise of the markets, had triggered an immediate fall of [[Wall Street]].<ref name="merkel" /> |
|||
Professor Didier Marteau notes a paradoxical increase of [[volatility (finance)|volatility]], and the difficulties encountered by some investors in their hedging.<ref>{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2010/06/14/doit-on-interdire-les-ventes-nues-en-france_1370483_3232.html |
|||
| title = Doit-on interdire les ventes "nues" en France ? |
|||
| date = 14 June 2010 |
|||
| work = Le Monde |
|||
| author = Didier Marteau |
|||
| accessdate = 4 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> Hedge funds specializing in long / short strategies have had to forgo some purchases because they could not sell other assets short.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hedge-funds-suffer-as-short-selling-ban-disrupts-strategies |
|||
| title = Hedge funds suffer as short selling ban disrupts strategies |
|||
| date = 27 September 2008 |
|||
| work = MarketWatch |
|||
| accessdate = 10 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
In the UK, the [[Financial Services Authority]] had a moratorium on short selling 29 leading financial stocks, effective from 2300 [[GMT]], 19 September 2008 until 16 January 2009.<ref>{{cite news |
|||
Indeed, the comparison of the price history, of financial stocks, with that of non-financial stocks, and comparisons, for the sole financial stocks, between their behaviour before or after ban periods, and their behaviour during ban periods, showed those measures had the effect, not to stem their price fall, but to raise their volatility.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7624012.stm |
|||
|title=FSA clamps down on short-selling |
|||
| title = shackling shortsellers: The 2008 shorting ban |
|||
|date=2008-09-18 |
|||
|author= [[BBC]] |
|||
| accessdate=2010-01-04 |
|||
| author = Ekkehart Boehmer, Charles M. Jones, Xiaoyan Zhang |
|||
| work=BBC News}}</ref> |
|||
| accessdate = 4 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
After the ban was lifted, [[John McFall, Baron McFall of Alcluith|John McFall]], chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]], made clear in public statements and a letter to the FSA that he believed it ought to be extended. |
|||
Even the mandatory disclosure of short positions may have another undesirable effect: excessive transparency may trigger herd behavior and ultimately also feed panic. |
|||
In the US, a similar response was made by the [[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission|Securities and Exchange Commission]] with a ban on short selling on 799 financial stocks from 19 September 2008 until 2 October 2008. Greater penalties for naked shorting, by mandating delivery of stocks at clearing time, were also introduced. Some state governors have been urging state pension bodies to refrain from lending stock for shorting purposes.<ref>{{cite news |
|||
==== Practical difficulties of implementation ==== |
|||
|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aTHLqfgpnFYw&refer=home |
|||
|title=Short Sellers under Fire in U.S., U.K. After AIG Fall |
|||
The measures decided so far depend on the diligence of all participants to comply with regulations and the fairness of the information they provide. |
|||
|date=2008-09-19 |
|||
Going further, toward an automated control of transactions, is costly and technically difficult. Checking that a short sale is covered by a borrowing implies an integration of trading systems with delivery-and-settlement systems; but that would be inconsistent, at least in Europe, with the principles of segregation of those two functions, and competition between their service providers, which are the very basis of the European directive on [[Markets in Financial Instruments Directive|Markets in Financial Instruments]], enforced since 2004.<ref name="jouyet">{{fr}}{{cite web |
|||
|author= Bloomberg |
|||
| url = http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/cr-cespeculation/09-10/c0910003.asp |
|||
|authorlink= Bloomberg L.P. |
|||
| title = Commission d’enquête sur les mécanismes de spéculation affectant le fonctionnement des économies - Compte-rendu n°3 |
|||
| date = 8 September 2010 |
|||
| work = The French National Assembly |
|||
| accessdate = 6 December 2010 |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
Checking that the price of a short sale is greater than or equal to the previous sale is certainly a proven mechanism, but the recent stock market fragmentation<ref name="jouyet" /> would make it more expensive to implement (how to compare a price negotiated in trading venue X with the previous one negotiated in trading venue Y?), except to leave breaches in which short sellers would step into. |
|||
Another proposal, to reduce the settlement period from T 3 to T 1, represents alone a challenge, and it would not even apply to over-the-counter sales. |
|||
Soon thereafter, between 19 and 21 September 2008, [[Australia]] temporarily banned short selling,<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24432750-5014000,00.html | title=The Australian | date=2008-10-02}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref> and later placed an indefinite ban on naked short selling.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.smh.com.au/business/asx-ban-on-short-selling-is-indefinite-20081003-4t16.html | work=The Sydney Morning Herald | title=ASX ban on short selling is indefinite | date=2008-10-03}}</ref> The ban on short selling was further extended for another 28 days on 21 October 2008.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/08-210 ASIC extends ban on covered short selling?openDocument |title=Australian Securities and Investments Commission - 08-210 ASIC extends ban on covered short selling |publisher=Asic.gov.au |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> [[Germany]], [[Ireland]], [[Switzerland]] and [[Canada]] banned short selling leading financial stocks,<ref name="NBR_35494">{{cite news |url=http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/australian-short-selling-ban-goes-further-other-bourses-35494 |title=Australian short selling ban goes further than other bourses |author=McDonald, Sarah |date=22 September 2008 |work=[[National Business Review]] |accessdate=9 November 2011}}</ref> and [[France]], the [[Netherlands]] and [[Belgium]] banned naked short selling leading financial stocks.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.forbes.com/markets/2008/09/22/briefing-europe-update-markets-equity-cx_vr_0922markets12.html | work=Forbes | first=Vidya | last=Ram | title=Europe Spooked By Revenge Of The Commodities | date=2008-09-22}}</ref> |
|||
==== Arbitrary market restriction ==== |
|||
By contrast, Chinese regulators have responded by allowing short selling, along with a package of other market reforms.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSSHA10179120081005 | work=Reuters | title=UPDATE 2-China to launch stocks margin trade, short sales | date=2008-10-05 | first=Samuel | last=Shen}}</ref> |
|||
The true value of any entity is always circumscribed by the market value. Short selling allows the market a powerful voice when share prices are deemed unrealistically high. Being that it is in any entity's best interests to be valued high, there is a propensity for quoted companies to be overvalued based on disclosed data and reports, cumulative positive imbalances eventually resulting in a crash. Short selling allows a strict redress of deemed value, which smaller adjustments on a company-by company-basis might avoid more significant market-wide collapses on a longer cycle. |
|||
An assessment of the effect of a ban on short-selling that was enacted in many countries in the fall of 2008 showed that it had only "little impact" on the movements of stocks, with stock prices moving in the same way as they would have moved anyhow, but the ban reduced volume and liquidity.<ref>{{cite journal| author=Oakley D |journal=Financial Times| date=2008-12-18 |page=27 |title=Short-selling ban has minimal effect.}}</ref> By December, countries in Europe were considering to remove the ban, while the ban in the US was already lifted in October 2008. The SEC [http://paulwilkinson.com/wiki/index.php?title=Short_Selling_Rule#SEC_Proposals_to_Restrict_Short_Sales proposed new restrictions on short selling] in April 2009. |
|||
== Notes and references == |
|||
{{Reflist|2}} |
|||
==Views of short selling== |
|||
{{Expand section|date=August 2009}} |
|||
Advocates of short selling argue that the practice is an essential part of the [[price discovery]] mechanism.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=281514 |title=Short Sale Constraints And Stock Returns by C.M Jones and O.A. Lamont |doi=10.2139/ssrn.281514 |publisher=Papers.ssrn.com |date=2001-09-20 |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> Financial researchers at Duke University said in a study that short interest is an indicator of poor future stock performance (the self-fulfilling aspect) and that short sellers exploit market mistakes about firms' fundamentals.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/seminarscalendar/Short.pdf |title=Do Short Sellers Convey Information About Changes in Fundamentals or Risk? |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
Such noted investors as [[Seth Klarman]] and [[Warren Buffett]] have said that short sellers help the market. Klarman argued that short sellers are a useful counterweight to the widespread bullishness on Wall Street,<ref>''[[Margin of safety (book)|Margin of safety]]'' (1991), by [[Seth Klarman]]. ISBN 0-88730-510-5</ref> while Buffett believes that short sellers are useful in uncovering fraudulent accounting and other problems at companies.<ref>{{cite web|last=Casterline |first=Rick |url=http://www.fool.com/news/commentary/2006/commentary06060104.htm |title=2006 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting Q&A with Warren Buffett |publisher=Fool.com |date=2006-06-01 |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
<!-- Grammar is all wrong here! -->Shortseller [[James Chanos]] received widespread publicity when he was an early critic of the accounting practices of [[Enron Corp.]]<ref name='Times-Chanos'>{{cite news | first=Jim | last=Peterson | coauthors= |authorlink= | title=Balance Sheet : The silly season isn't over yet | date=2002-07-06 | publisher= | url =http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/06/your-money/06iht-maccount06_ed3_.html | work =The New York Times | pages = | accessdate = 2009-08-09 | language = }} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> Chanos responds to critics of short-selling by pointing to the critical role they played in identifying problems at Enron, Boston Market and other "financial disasters" over the years.<ref>[http://finance.yahoo.com/retirement/article/108534/contrarian-investor-sees-economic-crash-in-china?mod=retire-planning Contrarian Investor Sees Economic Crash in China]</ref> In 2011, research oriented short sellers were widely acknowledged for exposing the China stock frauds.<ref>{{cite web|last=Alpert |first=Bill |url=http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424053111904113704576383892664177456.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoobarrons |title=B. Alpert "Even Short Sellers Burned by Chinese Shares" (Barrons 20110618) |publisher=Online.barrons.com |date=2011-06-18 |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> |
|||
Commentator [[Jim Cramer]] has expressed concern about short selling and started a petition calling for the reintroduction of the [[uptick rule]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thestreet.com/petition |title=TheStreet |publisher=TheStreet |date= |accessdate=2012-05-24}}</ref> Books like ''Don't Blame the Shorts'' by [[Robert Sloan]] and ''Fubarnomics'' by [[Robert E. Wright]] suggest Cramer exaggerated the costs of short selling and underestimated the benefits, which may include the [[ex ante]] identification of [[asset]] [[Stock market bubble|bubble]]s. |
|||
Individual short sellers have been subject to criticism and even litigation. [[Manuel P. Asensio]], for example, engaged in a lengthy legal battle<!--over what?--> with the pharmaceutical manufacturer Hemispherx Biopharma.<ref name='Forbes-Asensio'>{{cite news | first=Brett | last=Nelson | coauthors= |authorlink= | title=Short Story | date=2001-11-26 | publisher= | url =http://members.forbes.com/forbes/2001/1126/216.html | work =Forbes | pages = | accessdate = 2009-08-09 | language = }}</ref> |
|||
Several studies of the effectiveness of short selling bans indicate that short selling bans do not contribute to more moderate market dynamics.<ref>Marsh I and Niemer N (2008) "The impact of short sales restrictions". Technical report, commissioned and funded by the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) and London Investment Banking Association (LIBA).</ref><ref>Lobanova O, Hamid S. S. and Prakash A. J. (2010) "The impact of short-sale restrictions on volatility, liquidity, and market efficiency: the evidence from the short-sale ban in the u.s." Technical report, Florida International University - Department of Finance.</ref><ref>Beber A. and Pagano M. (2009) "Short-selling bans around the world: Evidence from the 2007-09 crisis". CSEF Working Papers 241, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.</ref><ref name="Kerbl2010">Kerbl S (2010) [http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.6284 "Regulatory Medicine Against Financial Market Instability: What Helps And What Hurts?"] ''arXiv.org''.</ref> |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
* [[Anthony Elgindy]] |
|||
* [[Inverse exchange-traded fund]] |
* [[Inverse exchange-traded fund]] |
||
* [[Joseph Parnes]] |
|||
* [[Long (finance)]] |
* [[Long (finance)]] |
||
* [[James Chanos]] |
|||
* [[Magnetar Capital]] |
* [[Magnetar Capital]] |
||
* [[Manuel P. Asensio]] |
|||
* [[Repurchase agreement]] |
* [[Repurchase agreement]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Securities lending]] |
||
* [[Short ratio]] |
|||
* [[Socially responsible investing]] |
* [[Socially responsible investing]] |
||
* [[Speculation]] |
|||
* [[Straddle]] |
* [[Straddle]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Uptick rule]] |
||
* [[Manuel P. Asensio]] |
|||
=== External links === |
|||
* [[James Chanos]] |
|||
* [http://www.dataexplorers.com Official site of Data Explorers], which publishes a securities finance activity indicator |
|||
* [[Anthony Elgindy]] |
|||
* [http://books.google.fr/books?id=uTzzpgyVBKQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Short-selling : Strategies, Risks and Rewards&source=bl&ots=YirdtMeh0W&sig=_Le0yXygw_6ZfnFwEl3wyFADQTQ&hl=fr&ei=PqfzTNfFHsTBhAfMuqGNBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDwQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false Short-selling: Strategies, Risks, and Rewards], Frank J.Fabozzi, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New Jersey, 2004 |
|||
* [[Joseph Parnes]] |
|||
== References == |
|||
{{Reflist|2}} |
|||
*Sloan, Robert. ''Don't Blame the Shorts: Why Short Sellers Are Always Blamed for Market Crashes and Why History Is Repeating Itself'', (New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2009). ISBN 978-0-07-163686-5 |
|||
*Wright, Robert E. ''Fubarnomics: A Lighthearted, Serious Look at America's Economic Ills'', (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus, 2010). ISBN 978-1-61614-191-2 |
|||
== External links and sources == |
|||
* [http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052970204391004575385140662923392.html#articleTabs_panel_article=1 Barron's on Off Wall Street Consulting Group, July 31, 2010] |
* [http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052970204391004575385140662923392.html#articleTabs_panel_article=1 Barron's on Off Wall Street Consulting Group, July 31, 2010] |
||
* [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/transport/3281537/Porsche-and-VW-share-row-how-Germany-got-revenge-on-the-hedge-fund-locusts.html Porsche VW Shortselling Scandal] |
|||
* [http://www.globalinv.com/Sept29-08abstract.htm "Short-Selling Bans Dampen 130/30 Strategies Worldwide," Global Investment Technology, Sept. 29, 2008] |
* [http://www.globalinv.com/Sept29-08abstract.htm "Short-Selling Bans Dampen 130/30 Strategies Worldwide," Global Investment Technology, Sept. 29, 2008] |
||
* [http://www.investopedia.com/university/shortselling/ Short Selling Introduction] |
* [http://www.investopedia.com/university/shortselling/ Short Selling Introduction] |
||
Line 635: | Line 303: | ||
* [http://www.risk.net/public/showPage.html?validate=0&page=risknet_login2&url=/public/showPage.html?page=343543 Coverage of controversial short-selling 'conspiracy' lawsuits by tobacco litigation specialists in US: Short Tempers, ''Risk'' Magazine (2006), Navroz Patel] |
* [http://www.risk.net/public/showPage.html?validate=0&page=risknet_login2&url=/public/showPage.html?page=343543 Coverage of controversial short-selling 'conspiracy' lawsuits by tobacco litigation specialists in US: Short Tempers, ''Risk'' Magazine (2006), Navroz Patel] |
||
* [http://www1.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawbusiness/issues/uploads/5-1/NYB103.pdf In pursuit of the naked short], Journal of Law and Business, New York University, Spring 2009 |
* [http://www1.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawbusiness/issues/uploads/5-1/NYB103.pdf In pursuit of the naked short], Journal of Law and Business, New York University, Spring 2009 |
||
* {{fr}} [http://www.amf-france.org/documents/general/8731_1.pdf Rapport de l'AMF sur les ventes à découvert], 23 February 2009 |
|||
* {{fr}} [http://www.amf-france.org/documents/general/10110_1.pdf Interdiction de prendre une position courte nette sur une liste de valeurs financières françaises (Foire aux questions)], 14 September 2011, retrieved 13 February 2012 |
|||
=== Bibliography === |
|||
* Sloan, Robert. ''Don't Blame the Shorts: Why Short Sellers Are Always Blamed for Market Crashes and Why History Is Repeating Itself'', (New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2009). ISBN 978-0-07-163686-5 |
|||
* Wright, Robert E. ''Fubarnomics: A Lighthearted, Serious Look at America's Economic Ills'', (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus, 2010). ISBN 978-1-61614-191-2 |
|||
{{Stock market}} |
{{Stock market}} |
||
Line 646: | Line 308: | ||
[[Category:Short selling]] |
[[Category:Short selling]] |
||
[[Category:Financial markets]] |
[[Category:Financial markets]] |
||
[[Category:Finance]] |
|||
[[Category:Financial regulation]] |
[[Category:Financial regulation]] |
||
Line 676: | Line 339: | ||
[[fi:Lyhyeksi myynti]] |
[[fi:Lyhyeksi myynti]] |
||
[[sv:Blankning]] |
[[sv:Blankning]] |
||
[[th:การขาย |
[[th:การขายของมือเปล่า]] |
||
[[tr:Açığa satış]] |
[[tr:Açığa satış]] |
||
[[uk:Короткий продаж]] |
[[uk:Короткий продаж]] |
Revision as of 15:34, 8 November 2012
In finance, short selling (also known as shorting or going short) is the practice of selling securities or other financial instruments, with the intention of subsequently repurchasing them ("covering") at a lower price. In the event of an interim price decline, the short seller will profit, since the cost of repurchase will be less than the proceeds received upon the initial (short) sale. Conversely, the short seller will incur a loss in the event that the price of a shorted instrument should rise prior to repurchase. The potential loss on a short sale is theoretically unlimited in the event of an unlimited rise in the price of the instrument, however in practice the short seller will be required to post margin or collateral to cover losses, and any inability to do so on a timely basis would cause its broker or counterparty to liquidate the position. In the securities markets, the seller generally must borrow the securities in order to effect delivery in the short sale. In some cases, the short seller must pay a fee to borrow the securities and must additionally reimburse the lender for cash returns the lender would have received had the securities not been loaned out.
Short selling is most commonly done with instruments traded in public securities, futures or currency markets, due to the liquidity and real-time price dissemination characteristic of such markets and because the instruments defined within each class are fungible.
In practical terms, going short can be considered the opposite of the conventional practice of "going long", whereby an investor profits from an increase in the price of the asset. Mathematically, the return from a short position is equivalent to that of owning (being "long") a negative amount of the instrument. A short sale may be motivated by a variety of objectives. Speculators may sell short in the hope of realizing a profit on an instrument which appears to be overvalued, just as long investors or speculators hope to profit from a rise in the price of an instrument which appears undervalued. Traders or fund managers may hedge a long position or a portfolio through one or more short positions.
Concept
Part of a series on |
Finance |
---|
To profit from a decrease in the price of a security, a short seller can borrow the security and sell it expecting that it will be cheaper to repurchase in the future. When the seller decides that the time is right (or when the lender recalls the securities), the seller buys equivalent securities and returns them to the lender. The process relies on the fact that the securities (or the other assets being sold short) are fungible; the term "borrowing" is therefore used in the sense of borrowing $10, where a different $10 note can be returned to the lender (as opposed to borrowing a car, where the same car must be returned).
A short seller typically borrows through a broker, who is usually holding the securities for another investor who owns the securities; the broker himself seldom purchases the securities to lend to the short seller.[1] The lender does not lose the right to sell the securities while they have been lent, as the broker will usually hold a large pool of such securities for a number of investors which, as such securities are fungible, can instead be transferred to any buyer. In most market conditions there is a ready supply of securities to be borrowed, held by pension funds, mutual funds and other investors.
The act of buying back the securities that were sold short is called "covering the short" or "covering the position". A short position can be covered at any time before the securities are due to be returned. Once the position is covered, the short seller will not be affected by any subsequent rises or falls in the price of the securities, as he already holds the securities required to repay the lender.
Short selling refers broadly to any transaction used by an investor to profit from the decline in price of an asset or financial instrument. However some short positions, for example those undertaken by means of derivatives contracts, are not technically short sales because no underlying asset is actually delivered upon the initiation of the position. Derivatives contracts include futures, options, and swaps.[2][3]
Worked examples
Profitable trade
Shares in C & Company currently trade at $10 per share.
- A short seller borrows 100 shares of C & Company and immediately sells them for a total of $1,000.
- Subsequently, the price of the shares falls to $8 per share.
- Short seller now buys 100 shares of C & Company for $800.
- Short seller returns the shares to the lender, who must accept the return of the same number of shares as was lent despite the fact that the market value of the shares has decreased.
- Short seller retains as profit the $200 difference (minus borrowing fees) between the price at which he sold the shares he borrowed and the lower price at which he was able to purchase the shares he returned.
Loss-making trade
Shares in C & Company currently trade at $10 per share.
- A short seller borrows 100 shares of C & Company and immediately sells them for a total of $1,000.
- Subsequently the price of the shares rises to $25.
- Short seller is required to return the shares, and to meet the obligation is compelled to buy 100 shares of C & Company for $2,500.
- Short seller returns the shares to the lender who accepts the return of the same number of shares as was lent.
- Short seller incurs as a loss the $1,500 difference between the price at which he sold the shares he borrowed and the higher price at which he had to purchase the shares he returned (plus borrowing fees).
History
Some hold that the practice was invented in 1609 by Dutch merchant Isaac Le Maire, a sizeable shareholder of the Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie (VOC).[4] Short selling can have a negative effect on the stocks being shorted, driving down the price of shares of that security. This, combined with the seemingly complex and hard to follow tactics of the practice, have made short selling a historical target for criticism.[5]
In the eighteenth century, England banned it outright.[6] The London banking house of Neal, James, Fordyce and Down collapsed in June 1772, precipitating a major crisis which included the collapse of almost every private bank in Scotland, and a liquidity crisis in the two major banking centres of the world, London and Amsterdam. The bank had been speculating by shorting East India Company stock on a massive scale, and apparently using customer deposits to cover losses. It was perceived[citation needed] as having a magnifying effect in the violent downturn in the Dutch tulip market in the eighteenth century. In another well-referenced example, George Soros became notorious for "breaking the Bank of England" on Black Wednesday of 1992, when he sold short more than $10 billion worth of pounds sterling.
The term "short" was in use from at least the mid-nineteenth century. It is commonly understood that "short" is used because the short-seller is in a deficit position with his brokerage house. Jacob Little was known as The Great Bear of Wall Street who began shorting stocks in the United States in 1822.[7]
Short sellers were blamed for the Wall Street Crash of 1929.[8] Regulations governing short selling were implemented in the United States in 1929 and in 1940. [citation needed] Political fallout from the 1929 crash led Congress to enact a law banning short sellers from selling shares during a downtick; this was known as the uptick rule, and this was in effect until July 3, 2007 when it was removed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Release No. 34-55970).[9] President Herbert Hoover condemned short sellers and even J. Edgar Hoover said he would investigate short sellers for their role in prolonging the Depression.[citation needed] A few years later, in 1949, Alfred Winslow Jones founded a fund (that was unregulated) that bought stocks while selling other stocks short, hence hedging some of the market risk, and the hedge fund was born.[10]
Negative news, such as litigation against a company, may also entice professional traders to sell the stock short in hope of the stock price going down.
During the Dot-com bubble, shorting a start-up company could backfire since it could be taken over at a price higher than the price at which speculators shorted.[citation needed] Short-sellers were forced to cover their positions at acquisition prices, while in many cases the firm often overpaid for the start-up.[citation needed]
Naked short selling restrictions in 2008
In September 2008 short selling, exacerbated by naked short selling,[11] was seen as a contributing factor to undesirable market volatility, and was subsequently prohibited by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for 799 financial companies for three weeks in an effort to stabilize those companies.[12] At the same time the U.K. Financial Services Authority (FSA) prohibited short selling for 32 financial companies.[13] On September 22, Australia enacted even more extensive measures with a total ban of short selling.[14] Also on September 22, the Spanish market regulator, CNMV, required investors to notify it of any short positions in financial institutions, if they exceed 0.25% of a company's share capital, and it also restricted naked shorting.[15]
In an interview with the Washington Post in late December 2008, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox said that the decision to impose a three-week ban on short selling of financial company stocks was taken reluctantly, but that the view at the time, from Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson and Federal Reserve chairman Ben S. Bernanke, was that "if we did not act, and act at that instant, these financial institutions could fail as a result and there would be nothing left to save." Later he changed his mind and thought the ban unproductive.[16] In a December 2008 interview with Reuters, he explained that the SEC's Office of Economic Analysis was still evaluating data from the temporary ban, and that preliminary findings point to several unintended market consequences and side effects. "While the actual effects of this temporary action will not be fully understood for many more months, if not years," he said, "knowing what we know now, I believe on balance the Commission would not do it again.”[17]
Naked short selling restrictions in European economic crisis
In June 2010, due to the economical crisis Germany permanently banned naked short selling.[18]
In August 2011, France, Italy, Spain, Belgium and South Korea banned all short selling in their financial stocks.[19]
Mechanism
Short selling stock consists of the following:
- The speculator instructs the broker to sell the shares and the proceeds are credited to his broker's account at the firm upon which the firm can earn interest. Generally, the short seller does not earn interest on the short proceeds and cannot use or encumber the proceeds for another transaction.[20]
- Upon completion of the sale, the investor has 3 days (in the US) to borrow the shares. If required by law, the investor first ensures that cash or equity is on deposit with his brokerage firm as collateral for the initial short margin requirement. Some short sellers, mainly firms and hedge funds, participate in the practice of naked short selling, where the shorted shares are not borrowed or delivered.
- The speculator may close the position by buying back the shares (called covering). If the price has dropped, he makes a profit. If the stock advanced, he takes a loss.
- Finally, the speculator may return the shares to the lender or stay short indefinitely.
- At any time, the lender may call for the return of his shares e.g. because he wants to sell them. The borrower must buy shares on the market and return them to the lender (or he must borrow the shares from elsewhere). When the broker completes this transaction automatically, it is called a 'buy-in'.
Shorting stock in the U.S.
In the U.S., in order to sell stocks short, the seller must arrange for a broker-dealer to confirm that it is able to make delivery of the shorted securities. This is referred to as a "locate.” Brokers have a variety of means to borrow stocks in order to facilitate locates and make good delivery of the shorted security.
The vast majority of stocks borrowed by U.S. brokers come from loans made by the leading custody banks and fund management companies (see list below). Institutions often lend out their shares in order to earn a little extra money on their investments. These institutional loans are usually arranged by the custodian who holds the securities for the institution. In an institutional stock loan, the borrower puts up cash collateral, typically 102% of the value of the stock. The cash collateral is then invested by the lender, who often rebates part of the interest to the borrower. The interest that is kept by the lender is the compensation to the lender for the stock loan.
Brokerage firms can also borrow stocks from the accounts of their own customers. Typical margin account agreements give brokerage firms the right to borrow customer shares without notifying the customer. In general, brokerage accounts are only allowed to lend shares from accounts for which customers have "debit balances", meaning they have borrowed from the account. SEC Rule 15c3-3 imposes such severe restrictions on the lending of shares from cash accounts or excess margin (fully paid for) shares from margin accounts that most brokerage firms do not bother except in rare circumstances. (These restrictions include that the broker must have the express permission of the customer and provide collateral or a letter of credit.)
Most brokers will allow retail customers to borrow shares to short a stock only if one of their own customers has purchased the stock on margin. Brokers will go through the "locate" process outside their own firm to obtain borrowed shares from other brokers only for their large institutional customers.
Stock exchanges such as the NYSE or the NASDAQ typically report the "short interest" of a stock, which gives the number of shares that have been legally sold short as a percent of the total float. Alternatively, these can also be expressed as the short interest ratio, which is the number of shares legally sold short as a multiple of the average daily volume. These can be useful tools to spot trends in stock price movements but in order to be reliable, investors must also ascertain the number of shares brought into existence by naked shorters. Speculators are cautioned to remember that for every share that has been shorted (owned by a new owner), a 'shadow owner' exists (i.e. the original owner) who also is part of the universe of owners of that stock, i.e. Despite not having any voting rights, he has not relinquished his interest and some rights in that stock.
Securities lending
When a security is sold, the seller is contractually obligated to deliver it to the buyer. If a seller sells a security short without owning it first, the seller needs to borrow the security from a third party to fulfill its obligation. Otherwise, the seller will "fail to deliver," the transaction will not settle, and the seller may be subject to a claim from its counterparty. Certain large holders of securities, such as a custodian or investment management firm, often lend out these securities to gain extra income, a process known as securities lending. The lender receives a fee for this service. Similarly, retail investors can sometimes make an extra fee when their broker wants to borrow their securities. This is only possible when the investor has full title of the security, so it cannot be used as collateral for margin buying.
Sources of short interest data
Time delayed short interest data (for legally shorted shares) is available in a number of countries, including the US, the UK, Hong Kong, and Spain. The amount of stocks being shorted on a global basis has increased in recent years for various structural reasons (e.g. the growth of 130/30 type strategies, short or bear ETFs). The data is typically delayed; for example, the NASDAQ requires its broker-dealer member firms to report data on the 15th of each month, and then publishes a compilation eight days later.[21]
Some market data providers (like Data Explorers and SunGard Financial Systems[22]) believe that stock lending data provides a good proxy for short interest levels (excluding any naked short interest). SunGard provides daily data on short interest by tracking the proxy variables based on borrowing and lending data which it collects.[23]
Short selling terms
Days to Cover (DTC) is a numerical term that describes the relationship between the amount of shares in a given equity that have been legally short sold and the number of days of typical trading that it would require to 'cover' all legal short positions outstanding. For example, if there are ten million shares of XYZ Inc. that are currently legally short sold and the average daily volume of XYZ shares traded each day is one million, it would require ten days of trading for all legal short positions to be covered (10 million / 1 million).
Short Interest is a numerical term that relates the number of shares in a given equity that have been legally shorted divided by the total shares outstanding for the company, usually expressed as a percent. For example, if there are ten million shares of XYZ Inc. that are currently legally short sold, and the total number of shares issued by the company is one hundred million, the Short Interest is 10% (10 million / 100 million). If however, shares are being created through naked short selling, "fails" data must be accessed to assess accurately the true level of short interest.
Major lenders
- Merrill Lynch (New Jersey)
- State Street Corporation (Boston)
- JP Morgan Chase (New York)
- Northern Trust (Chicago)
- Fortis (Amsterdam, now defunct)
- ABN AMRO (Amsterdam, Netherlands, formerly Fortis)
- Citibank (New York)
- Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (New York)
- UBS AG (Zurich, Switzerland)
- Barclays (London, England)
Naked short selling
A naked short sale occurs when a security is sold short without borrowing the security within a set time, 3 days (T 3) in the US. This means that the buyer of such a short is buying the short-seller's promise to deliver a share, rather than buying the share itself. The short-seller's promise is known as a hypothecated share.
When the holder of the underlying stock receives a dividend, the holder of the hypothecated share would receive an equal dividend from the short seller.
Naked shorting has been made illegal except where allowed under limited circumstances by market makers. It is detected by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (in the US) as a "failure to deliver" or simply "fail.” While many fails are settled in a short time, some have been allowed to linger in the system.
In the US, arranging to borrow a security before a short sale is called a locate. In 2005, to prevent widespread failure to deliver securities, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) put in place Regulation SHO, intended to prevent speculators from selling some stocks short before doing a locate. Requirements that are more stringent were put in place in September 2008, ostensibly to prevent the practice from exacerbating market declines. The rules were made permanent in 2009.
Fees
When a broker facilitates the delivery of a client's short sale, the client is charged a fee for this service, usually a standard commission similar to that of purchasing a similar security.
If the short position begins to move against the holder of the short position (i.e., the price of the security begins to rise), money will be removed from the holder's cash balance and moved to his or her margin balance. If short shares continue to rise in price, and the holder does not have sufficient funds in the cash account to cover the position, the holder will begin to borrow on margin for this purpose, thereby accruing margin interest charges. These are computed and charged just as for any other margin debit. Therefore, only margin accounts can be used to open a short position.
When a security's ex-dividend date passes, the dividend is deducted from the shortholder's account and paid to the person from whom the stock is borrowed.
For some brokers, the short seller may not earn interest on the proceeds of the short sale or use it to reduce outstanding margin debt. These brokers may not pass this benefit on to the retail client unless the client is very large. The interest is often split with the lender of the security.
Dividends and voting rights
Where shares have been shorted and the company which issues the shares distributes a dividend, the question arises as to who receives the dividend. The new buyer of the shares, who is the "holder of record" and holds the shares outright, will receive the dividend from the company. However, the lender, who may hold its shares in a margin account with a prime broker and is unlikely to be aware that these particular shares are being lent out for shorting, also expects to receive a dividend. The short seller will therefore pay to the lender an amount equal to the dividend in order to compensate, though as this payment does not come from the company it is not technically a dividend as such. The short seller is therefore said to be "short the dividend".
A similar issue comes up with the voting rights attached to the shorted shares. Unlike a dividend, voting rights cannot legally be synthesized and so the buyer of the shorted share, as the holder of record, controls the voting rights. The owner of a margin account from which the shares were lent will have agreed in advance to relinquish voting rights to shares during the period of any short sale.[24] As noted earlier, victims of Naked Shorting attacks sometimes report that the number of votes cast is greater than the number of shares issued by the company.[25]
Markets
Futures and options contracts
When trading futures contracts, being 'short' means having the legal obligation to deliver something at the expiration of the contract, although the holder of the short position may alternately buy back the contract prior to expiration instead of making delivery. Short futures transactions are often used by producers of a commodity to fix the future price of goods they have not yet produced. Shorting a futures contract is sometimes also used by those holding the underlying asset (i.e. those with a long position) as a temporary hedge against price declines. Shorting futures may also be used for speculative trades, in which case the investor is looking to profit from any decline in the price of the futures contract prior to expiration.
An investor can also purchase a put option, giving that investor the right (but not the obligation) to sell the underlying asset (such as shares of stock) at a fixed price. In the event of a market decline, the option holder may exercise these put options, obliging the counterparty to buy the underlying asset at the agreed upon (or "strike") price, which would then be higher than the current quoted spot price of the asset.
Currency
Selling short on the currency markets is different from selling short on the stock markets. Currencies are traded in pairs, each currency being priced in terms of another. In this way, selling short on the currency markets is identical to going long on stocks.
Novice traders or stock traders can be confused by the failure to recognize and understand this point: a contract is always long in terms of one medium and short another.
When the exchange rate has changed, the trader buys the first currency again; this time he gets more of it, and pays back the loan. Since he got more money than he had borrowed initially, he makes money. Of course, the reverse can also occur.
An example of this is as follows: Let us say a trader wants to trade with the US dollar and the Indian rupee currencies. Assume that the current market rate is USD 1 to Rs.50 and the trader borrows Rs.100. With this, he buys USD 2. If the next day, the conversion rate becomes USD 1 to Rs.51, then the trader sells his USD 2 and gets Rs.102. He returns Rs.100 and keeps the Rs.2 profit (minus fees).
One may also take a short position in a currency using futures or options; the preceding method is used to bet on the spot price, which is more directly analogous to selling a stock short.
Risks
This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2009) |
Note: this section does not apply to currency markets.
Short selling is sometimes referred to as a "negative income investment strategy" because there is no potential for dividend income or interest income. Stock is held only long enough to be sold pursuant to the contract, and one's return is therefore limited to short term capital gains, which are taxed as ordinary income. For this reason, buying shares (called "going long") has a very different risk profile from selling short. Furthermore, a "long's" losses are limited because the price can only go down to zero, but gains are not, as there is no limit, in theory, on how high the price can go. On the other hand, the short seller's possible gains are limited to the original price of the stock, which can only go down to zero, whereas the loss potential, again in theory, has no limit. For this reason, short selling probably is most often used as a hedge strategy to manage the risks of long investments.
Many short sellers place a "stop order" with their stockbroker after selling a stock short. This is an order to the brokerage to cover the position if the price of the stock should rise to a certain level, in order to limit the loss and avoid the problem of unlimited liability described above. In some cases, if the stock's price skyrockets, the stockbroker may decide to cover the short seller's position immediately and without his consent, in order to guarantee that the short seller will be able to make good on his debt of shares.
Short sellers must be aware of the potential for a short squeeze. When the price of a stock rises significantly, some people who are shorting the stock will cover their positions to limit their losses (this may occur in an automated way if the short sellers had stop-loss orders in place with their brokers); others may be forced to close their position to meet a margin call; others may be forced to cover, subject to the terms under which they borrowed the stock, if the person who lent the stock wishes to sell and take a profit. Since covering their positions involves buying shares, the short squeeze causes an ever further rise in the stock's price, which in turn may trigger additional covering. Because of this, most short sellers restrict their activities to heavily traded stocks, and they keep an eye on the "short interest" levels of their short investments. Short interest is defined as the total number of shares that have been legally sold short, but not covered. A short squeeze can be deliberately induced. This can happen when large investors (such as companies or wealthy individuals) notice significant short positions, and buy many shares, with the intent of selling the position at a profit to the short sellers who will be panicked by the initial uptick or who are forced to cover their short positions in order to avoid margin calls.
Another risk is that a given stock may become "hard to borrow." As defined by the SEC and based on lack of availability, a broker may charge a hard to borrow fee daily, without notice, for any day that the SEC declares a share is hard to borrow. Additionally, a broker may be required to cover a short seller's position at any time ("buy in"). The short seller receives a warning from the broker that he is "failing to deliver" stock, which will lead to the buy-in.[26]
Because short sellers must deliver the shorted securities to their broker eventually, and will need money to buy them, there is a credit risk for the broker. The penalties for failure to deliver on a short selling contract inspired financier Daniel Drew to warn: "He who sells what isn't his'n, Must buy it back or go to pris'n." To manage its own risk, the broker requires the short seller to keep a margin account, and charges interest of between 2% and 8% depending on the amounts involved.[27]
In 2011, the eruption of the massive China stock frauds on North American equity markets brought a related risk to light for the short seller. The efforts of research-oriented short sellers to expose these frauds eventually prompted NASDAQ, NYSE and other exchanges to impose sudden, lengthy trading halts that froze the values of shorted stocks at artificially high values. Reportedly in some instances, brokers charged short sellers excessively large amounts of interest based on these high values as the shorts were forced to continue their borrowings at least until the halts were lifted.[28]
Short sellers tend to temper overvaluation by selling into exuberance. Likewise, short sellers are said to provide price support by buying when negative sentiment is exacerbated after a significant price decline. Short selling can have negative implications if it causes a premature or unjustified share price collapse when the fear of cancellation due to bankruptcy becomes contagious.[29]
Strategies
Hedging
Hedging often represents a means of minimizing the risk from a more complex set of transactions. Examples of this are:
- A farmer who has just planted his wheat wants to lock in the price at which he can sell after the harvest. He would take a short position in wheat futures.
- A market maker in corporate bonds is constantly trading bonds when clients want to buy or sell. This can create substantial bond positions. The largest risk is that interest rates overall move. The trader can hedge this risk by selling government bonds short against his long positions in corporate bonds. In this way, the risk that remains is credit risk of the corporate bonds.
- an options trader may short shares in order to remain delta neutral so that he is not exposed to risk from price movements in the stocks that underlie his options
Arbitrage
A short seller may be trying to benefit from market inefficiencies arising from the mispricing of certain products. Examples of this are
- An arbitrageur who buys long futures contracts on a US Treasury security, and sells short the underlying US Treasury security.
Against the box
One variant of selling short involves a long position. "Selling short against the box" consists of holding a long position on which the shares have already risen, whereupon one then enters a short sell order for an equal amount of shares. The term box alludes to the days when a safe deposit box was used to store (long) shares. The purpose of this technique is to lock in paper profits on the long position without having to sell that position (and possibly incur taxes if said position has appreciated). Once the short position has been entered, it serves to balance the long position taken earlier. Thus, from that point in time, the profit is locked in (less brokerage fees and short financing costs), regardless of further fluctuations in the underlying share price. For example, one can ensure a profit in this way, while delaying sale until the subsequent tax year.
U.S. investors considering entering into a "short against the box" transaction should be aware of the tax consequences of this transaction. Unless certain conditions are met, the IRS deems a "short against the box" position to be a "constructive sale" of the long position, which is a taxable event. These conditions include a requirement that the short position be closed out within 30 days of the end of the year and that the investor must hold their long position, without entering into any hedging strategies, for a minimum of 60 days after the short position has been closed.[30]
The regulatory response
In the US, Regulation SHO was the SEC's first update to short selling restrictions since 1938. It established "locate" and "close-out" requirements[clarification needed] for broker-dealers, in an effort to curb naked short selling. Compliance with the regulation began on January 3, 2005.[31]
In the US, initial public offerings (IPOs) cannot be sold short for a month after they start trading. This mechanism is in place to ensure a degree of price stability during a company's initial trading period. However, some brokerage firms that specialize in penny stocks (referred to colloquially as bucket shops) have used the lack of short selling during this month to pump and dump thinly traded IPOs. Canada and other countries do allow selling IPOs (including U.S. IPOs) short.
In the UK, the Financial Services Authority had a moratorium on short selling 29 leading financial stocks, effective from 2300 GMT, 19 September 2008 until 16 January 2009.[32]
After the ban was lifted, John McFall, chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, House of Commons, made clear in public statements and a letter to the FSA that he believed it ought to be extended.
In the US, a similar response was made by the Securities and Exchange Commission with a ban on short selling on 799 financial stocks from 19 September 2008 until 2 October 2008. Greater penalties for naked shorting, by mandating delivery of stocks at clearing time, were also introduced. Some state governors have been urging state pension bodies to refrain from lending stock for shorting purposes.[33]
Soon thereafter, between 19 and 21 September 2008, Australia temporarily banned short selling,[34] and later placed an indefinite ban on naked short selling.[35] The ban on short selling was further extended for another 28 days on 21 October 2008.[36] Germany, Ireland, Switzerland and Canada banned short selling leading financial stocks,[37] and France, the Netherlands and Belgium banned naked short selling leading financial stocks.[38]
By contrast, Chinese regulators have responded by allowing short selling, along with a package of other market reforms.[39]
An assessment of the effect of a ban on short-selling that was enacted in many countries in the fall of 2008 showed that it had only "little impact" on the movements of stocks, with stock prices moving in the same way as they would have moved anyhow, but the ban reduced volume and liquidity.[40] By December, countries in Europe were considering to remove the ban, while the ban in the US was already lifted in October 2008. The SEC proposed new restrictions on short selling in April 2009.
Views of short selling
Advocates of short selling argue that the practice is an essential part of the price discovery mechanism.[41] Financial researchers at Duke University said in a study that short interest is an indicator of poor future stock performance (the self-fulfilling aspect) and that short sellers exploit market mistakes about firms' fundamentals.[42]
Such noted investors as Seth Klarman and Warren Buffett have said that short sellers help the market. Klarman argued that short sellers are a useful counterweight to the widespread bullishness on Wall Street,[43] while Buffett believes that short sellers are useful in uncovering fraudulent accounting and other problems at companies.[44]
Shortseller James Chanos received widespread publicity when he was an early critic of the accounting practices of Enron Corp.[45] Chanos responds to critics of short-selling by pointing to the critical role they played in identifying problems at Enron, Boston Market and other "financial disasters" over the years.[46] In 2011, research oriented short sellers were widely acknowledged for exposing the China stock frauds.[47]
Commentator Jim Cramer has expressed concern about short selling and started a petition calling for the reintroduction of the uptick rule.[48] Books like Don't Blame the Shorts by Robert Sloan and Fubarnomics by Robert E. Wright suggest Cramer exaggerated the costs of short selling and underestimated the benefits, which may include the ex ante identification of asset bubbles.
Individual short sellers have been subject to criticism and even litigation. Manuel P. Asensio, for example, engaged in a lengthy legal battle with the pharmaceutical manufacturer Hemispherx Biopharma.[49]
Several studies of the effectiveness of short selling bans indicate that short selling bans do not contribute to more moderate market dynamics.[50][51][52][53]
See also
- Inverse exchange-traded fund
- Long (finance)
- Magnetar Capital
- Repurchase agreement
- Securities lending
- Short ratio
- Socially responsible investing
- Speculation
- Straddle
- Uptick rule
References
- ^ "Understanding Short Selling - A Primer". Langasset.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ Larry Harris (2002). "Trading and Exchange: Market Microstructure for Practitioners". Oxford University Press. p. 41. ISBN 0195144708.
- ^ "An Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management". South-Western College. p. 6. ISBN 0324601204.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|authors=
ignored (help) - ^ NRC Handelsblad - Naked short selling is an old-Dutch trick (in Dutch only)[dead link ]
- ^ http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/eblj/issues/volume4/number1/Stanley.pdf
- ^ Tom Arnold (2011-10-20). "Germans wrong to shoot the short-selling messenger". Charliefell.com. Retrieved 2012-06-06.
- ^ "Scripophily - PSTA - Professional Scripophily Trade Association". Encyberpedia.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ "Short sellers have been the villain for 400 years". Reuters. 2008-09-26. Retrieved 2008-09-28.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ "SEC Release No. 34-55970" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ Lindgren, Hugo (2007-04-09). "New York Magazine - The Creation of the Hedge Fund". Nymag.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ "EMERGENCY ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(k)(2) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 TAKING TEMPORARY ACTION TO RESPOND TO MARKET DEVELOPMENTS. Release NO. 34-58592" (PDF). September 18, 2008.
- ^ "SEC Halts Short Selling of Financial Stocks to Protect Investors and Markets". . 2008-09-19. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ "FSA statement on short positions in financial stocks". FSA. 2008-09-18. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ "Australian short selling ban goes further than other bourses". NBR. 2008-09-22. Retrieved 2008-09-22.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ "La CNMV también estrecha el cerco a las posiciones bajistas". Expansión. 2008-09-22. Retrieved 2008-09-22.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ Paley, Amit R.; Hilzenrath, David S. (2008-12-24). "SEC Chair Defends His Restraint During Financial Crisis". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2010-05-23.
- ^ "SEC chief has regrets over short-selling ban". Reuters. 2008-12-31.
- ^ Reuters (May 28, 2010). "Germany to permanently ban some short selling: Bafin'". Reuters.
{{cite news}}
:|author=
has generic name (help) - ^ Geert de Clercq, Paul Day (11 August 2011), "WRAPUP 7-Europe curbs short-selling as credit markets swoon", Reuters
- ^ Federal Reserve Board. Regulation T § 220.12
- ^ NASDAQ. About the Short Interest Page.
- ^ SunGard's ShortSide.com discusses the product.
- ^ SunGard. SunGard Launches Borrow Indices; First Proxy for Measuring Short Interest on a Daily Basis. Business Wire.
- ^ "What happens to the voting rights on shares when the shares are used in a short sale transaction?". Investopedia. Retrieved 4 December 2008.
- ^ Greg LandContactAll Articles (2009-05-15). "Over-voting at Taser in 2005". Law.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ Arnold, Roger (2000-01-14). "Knowing the Rules of the Shorting Game". TheStreet. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ "margin account rates schedule". ScotTrade. 2011-06-18.
- ^ "Even Short-Sellers Burned by Chinese Shares". Barrons. 2011-06-18.
- ^ "The Theory and Practice of Short Selling, Chapter 9, Conclusions and Implications for Investors by Frank J. Fabozzi, Editor". Books.google.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ "United States IRS Publication 550 Investment Income and Expenses". Irs.gov. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ U.S. SEC (April 11, 2005). "Division of Market Regulation: Key Points about Regulation SHO".
- ^ BBC (2008-09-18). "FSA clamps down on short-selling". BBC News. Retrieved 2010-01-04.
- ^ Bloomberg (2008-09-19). "Short Sellers under Fire in U.S., U.K. After AIG Fall".
- ^ "The Australian". 2008-10-02. [dead link ]
- ^ "ASX ban on short selling is indefinite". The Sydney Morning Herald. 2008-10-03.
- ^ "Australian Securities and Investments Commission - 08-210 ASIC extends ban on covered short selling". Asic.gov.au. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ McDonald, Sarah (22 September 2008). "Australian short selling ban goes further than other bourses". National Business Review. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
- ^ Ram, Vidya (2008-09-22). "Europe Spooked By Revenge Of The Commodities". Forbes.
- ^ Shen, Samuel (2008-10-05). "UPDATE 2-China to launch stocks margin trade, short sales". Reuters.
- ^ Oakley D (2008-12-18). "Short-selling ban has minimal effect". Financial Times: 27.
- ^ "Short Sale Constraints And Stock Returns by C.M Jones and O.A. Lamont". Papers.ssrn.com. 2001-09-20. doi:10.2139/ssrn.281514. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ "Do Short Sellers Convey Information About Changes in Fundamentals or Risk?" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ Margin of safety (1991), by Seth Klarman. ISBN 0-88730-510-5
- ^ Casterline, Rick (2006-06-01). "2006 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting Q&A with Warren Buffett". Fool.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ Peterson, Jim (2002-07-06). "Balance Sheet : The silly season isn't over yet". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) [dead link ] - ^ Contrarian Investor Sees Economic Crash in China
- ^ Alpert, Bill (2011-06-18). "B. Alpert "Even Short Sellers Burned by Chinese Shares" (Barrons 20110618)". Online.barrons.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ "TheStreet". TheStreet. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
- ^ Nelson, Brett (2001-11-26). "Short Story". Forbes. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Marsh I and Niemer N (2008) "The impact of short sales restrictions". Technical report, commissioned and funded by the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) and London Investment Banking Association (LIBA).
- ^ Lobanova O, Hamid S. S. and Prakash A. J. (2010) "The impact of short-sale restrictions on volatility, liquidity, and market efficiency: the evidence from the short-sale ban in the u.s." Technical report, Florida International University - Department of Finance.
- ^ Beber A. and Pagano M. (2009) "Short-selling bans around the world: Evidence from the 2007-09 crisis". CSEF Working Papers 241, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
- ^ Kerbl S (2010) "Regulatory Medicine Against Financial Market Instability: What Helps And What Hurts?" arXiv.org.
- Sloan, Robert. Don't Blame the Shorts: Why Short Sellers Are Always Blamed for Market Crashes and Why History Is Repeating Itself, (New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2009). ISBN 978-0-07-163686-5
- Wright, Robert E. Fubarnomics: A Lighthearted, Serious Look at America's Economic Ills, (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus, 2010). ISBN 978-1-61614-191-2
External links and sources
- Barron's on Off Wall Street Consulting Group, July 31, 2010
- Porsche VW Shortselling Scandal
- "Short-Selling Bans Dampen 130/30 Strategies Worldwide," Global Investment Technology, Sept. 29, 2008
- Short Selling Introduction
- Short Interest: What it tells us
- SEC Discussion of Naked Short Selling
- '"Financial Interest Disclosures Can Protect Markets from 'Short & Distort' Manipulators", Alex J. Pollock, June 6, 2006, Washington Legal Foundation
- Coverage of controversial short-selling 'conspiracy' lawsuits by tobacco litigation specialists in US: Short Tempers, Risk Magazine (2006), Navroz Patel
- In pursuit of the naked short, Journal of Law and Business, New York University, Spring 2009