User talk:Cajek/Archive17

Happy Halloween!

Template:Halloween -- You know what to do. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:59, Dec 18

What the?

Why do you keep deleting my Christmas cards :( ? --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 03:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

pfffpbbb fbfbbbfbfbptptptppp bffbfbfbfbbbbbbbb   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 03:42)

User:Fag/HowTo:Have a Wacky Misadventure

Seeing as yew didn't want me to update the page... Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/alycia lane :P ~Fag x FS

I did update it. It appears that NOW you have 6 total reviews, 5 good reviews. I got messed up in the addition somehow! Anyways, good job!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 14:32)

Oh right =P Anyway, what do yew thinking about doing HowTo:Have a Wacky Misadventure? ~Fag x FS

Let's do it on your userspace: User:Fag/HowTo:Have a Wacky Misadventure! Sounds good? I don't know what'll happen, but we could give it a shot, right?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:05)

Okay then. I'm perfectly willing to give it a shot ^_^ how are we gonna do this then? Shall we plan it out? Or do hit after hit and see what comes out in the end (probably a mess)? :P And how are we going to present this? Will it be "looney toons" wacky or something else? What about humans that seem to be enacting looney toons? I dunno. Just throwing ideas really :P Question? Question? Another question? Question?! ~Fag x FS

Jeez, that was a lot of questions! I was thinking more like an Animal House parody. It explains, in a very scientific way, the necessary elements for having a wacky misadventure. The narrator would be some kinda scientist. How does that sound?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:13)

The sciencey thing's a cool idea... but never heard of nor seen "Animal House". I googled it... a gross-out comedy? ~Fag x FS

Glad you like it! "Animal House" was basically a wacky misadventure that took place on a college campus. "aaanimal houuuuuuseeee!"   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:17)

Nah, I literally saw on IMDB it was tagged with the genre "gross-out comedy". I also see it's a cult movie so I'm okay with going ahead :P Is there anywhere on the internet I can see it to get an idea? And also, I'm not sure how to continue from where yew started :P ~Fag x FS

You can jump in whenever you want. What do you see for the future of this page, Fag? Spitball some ideas, go ahead. What was that thing you said about Looney Tunes?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:22)

Well, an idea popped into my head about people acting like looney tunes characters. I didn't quite know how to fit it in but I liked the idea. The article at the moment is a bit of a problem for me really... not because I don't like it, hell no, but because I'm already lost as I've never seen Animal House. ~Fag x FS

Have you seen "Superbad"?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:28)

No... I haven't :P I probably should really, as I love watching comedies. If yew list off a couple o'comedies yew would possibly like to see in the article I could tell yew whether I've seen them or not :P ~Fag x FS

Well, remember, this isn't a parody of a movie, my idea is that it's a parody of a genre. Hmmm, well, any movie that has teenagers or college students as the main characters is just gonna be a "Wacky Misadventure". Seen anything like that, Fagz?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:32)

Yeah I have :P So basically it's just a teen movie parody? I can handle / am up for that. ^_^ ~Fag x FS

Basically, yeah, minus the horror genre!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:36)

MCLOVIN, YOU are THE MAN!

One for you...

Rather_Experimental_Ways_To_Annoy_The_Pee_Review_Folks MrN 19:54, Dec 18

Gaying around

See if you can fit any of your quotes into Gay if you fancy it. I'm trying to get gay VFH ready... I'm off to bed. Night. MrN 02:09, Dec 19

Thank You

Thank You!

Unknown_user would like to thank you for voting for his article, Why?:Stick Things in the Electrical Outlet.
To thank you, he has left a "golden surprise" in your electrical outlet. Use a screwdriver to get it out.

---

Thank you for your vote. Every single one counts. No, really, they do.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 02:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Grr

Happy XMAS er, Hanukkah no Easter maybe? New Year possibly presents day grr, Happy Spam Day! “ Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam! ” [1] MrN 21:29, Dec 19

All your article are belong to me

I have taken the liberty to writeth the article Why?:Give Up since you carelessly left it on your userpage. If you so desire, you may writeth it with me. Or not. But since it was on your page, I'd suggest writing it.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 22:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, don't just delete my review

I wrote a review for There, Iowa; why'd you try to delete it? Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Cajek, you really should talk to people on their talk pages about reviewing if you think they aren't doing a good job. Most people don't see the review pages after they review stuff. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:12, Dec 20

First off, Contestant, that wasn't a review. Second, I know Led, but I want to insult them to a wider audience!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:14)

On what grounds? The only major problems I saw were some formatting errors and the larger, more glaring issue of a lack of conclusion. I gave advice as such. I like the concept and find it funny; expressed as such. Care to elaborate? Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Come back here after you read UN:PRG. I know you haven't, so just oblige me.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:17)

I've read the damn guidelines, Cajek. Thanks for insinuating my stupidity. I gave advice as I saw it. Now should I consider myself too retarded to fully enjoy the rich details of the Pee Review process that you find pleasure in and abandon the concept entirely, or should I continue giving out opinions? Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

What Cajek is trying to say is that you should try to write a little more into your reviews: instead of saying what was funny, say why it was funny, and how to make it even funnier if you can think of anything. Give specific examples and advice to help the writer; otherwise you're just giving them a score. A score is nice, but I like advice. It's cool as ice. For it, I'd pray any price. Etc. Oh, and Cajek, tell people what they did wrong, don't just refer them to a set of guidelines, or after they read it they'll be scratching their head as to where they went wrong. Honestly, the review that Contestant did didn't look too bad, although the scores were...interesting.... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:20, Dec 20

I'm a fan of decimals. Maybe I should just stay away from the system entirely, considering that I'm obviously not achieving some grand standard here. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Cajek, meant to say please I'm sure. /me Pokes Cajek in the poison pee MrN 00:21, Dec 20

I really balked at the scores. If you're not going to read the articles and bother to write a good, long review, then... I'm not calling you stupid, I'm calling you a noob reviewer. According to my records, this is your second review? Try again. Try harder. /me squeeks when poked   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:23)

Oh, and no need to be a dick about it, Cajek. Don't just assume he hasn't read the guidelines just 'cause he doesn't have a lot to say. There;s no need to stop reviewing, Contestant. Now, can we both chill, please? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:24, Dec 20

Sorry Led!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:29)

Fair enough. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I did read the articles thoroughly, and I wrote my advice based on those articles. The decimals are arbitrarily assigned; the numbers are arbitrarily assigned within reasonability (good images? Have a 9.mumber. Need a conclusion? 3.mumble). And it's my third since returning, and I did a few back when I was here earlier this year; those have moved to talk pages, and I can't be bothered to hunt them all down. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

As the other author of There, Iowa, I'd say the review wasn't horrible, though the scores were confusing (that's just Contestant being Contestant). It did provide suggestions for improvement however, and those were taken. I understand what you're trying to accomplish Cajek, with the new guidlines and such. I agree with TheLedBalloon not to go reverting every Pee Review you don't think is good on site, but instead, revert ones that are blatantly bad. Also, now that's it's a better article, is it VFH worthy yet?--Æ 00:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I meant second since late November, which is when I started keeping track. Uh, just keep trying. I really think you should read the section on scoring. Also, I get yelled at alot for hunting down reviewers. It's worth it in the long run, because articles will become better over all. I think reviewing is important, in my opinion. And, you know, I used to be worse than you Contestant. Way worse. I do NOT revert every review that I don't like, only ones that I'm affiliated with. There is not VFH ready.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:34)

If you want me to use a more rigid scoring system, just say so. :D Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, uh... use a more rigid scoring system?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:38)

Alright. :D Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I do like the "Pie Score" Contestant used on my Pee Review though--Æ 00:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that was kinda weird... :D FRIENDS AGAIN WITH CONTESTANT!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:40)

Seconds Led's sentiments. It's not a matter of anyone not being "good enough". All contribution is very welcome. It's just more useful to an author if a reviewer can offer some additional suggestions as well as explain where scores have come from. Sometimes an article has been submitted to Pee Review many times before, and it can be rather frustrating when you get a review that tells you nothing new. Please continue to review Contestant your contributions are very welcome, and I'm sure you will receive more praise for your reviews as you progress in experience. As per reverting the review, just because you revert it, that does not mean that you consider it to be a bad review. Sometimes you just want a second opinion, or sometimes you want to put it in again when there was one done a long time ago... I just reverted the pee review on Gay as that was first done a while back... MrN 00:41, Dec 20

Stop being a gay whore on my talk page. Bitch!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:43)

I was going to type something, but I was in an EDIT CONFLICT! --Æ 00:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I wonder why cajek has soooooo many archive pages... Hmm MrN 00:49, Dec 20

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Gay

Just though I would wander past mentioning it... Not that I'm being gay about it or anything you understand... MrN 00:11, Dec 20

Free Beer

Don't let the cops catch you with it. Some Guy gave it to me.

Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

uuuuhhhh? bbbbb... ppppppbbbbbbttttthhhhhhhhh   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 01:38)

Hea!

Stop stealing my quotes and passing em off on your talk page BITCH! MrN 00:51, Dec 20

couldn't you have used an already made section to say useless things that are useless? This will only make me archive quicker/hate you.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 00:56)

Well, the last thing I want to do is make you have to archive faster... And what are you doing here? Where's my dam review! MrN 00:58, Dec 20

I'm nearly half done! Stop messaging me!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 01:02)

Oh, sorry, I won't type anything here then. MrN 01:10, Dec 20

I'm nearly done! Stop messaging me! Jeeeeez!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 01:13)

Thanks for the review. I have put some comments on the end, will let faggy boy have his say when he manages to stop using his mouth for other things. MrN 01:50, Dec 20

Ewww, blow jobs need to be done by girls who are anatomically built for such. Take Emily Browning for instance, her lips are utter perfection. Anyway, for good old fashioned bisexual humor read this: A Series of UnUnfornicate Events. I think I so deserve to win NoTm for all the amazing stuff I write.....--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 02:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

What am I doing?

Cajek salutes his army of admiring pee review followers.

Membership Requests - what the HELL do you think you're doing, N???? I'm trying not to scare people away from Pee Review. If we are not careful it will just be you, me and Fin left. Give him half a point eh? MrN 16:35, Dec 20

Take a look at it now...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 16:36)

"If we are not careful it will just be you, me and Fin left." I'm still here. Or don't I count now? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Woops Sorry dude! I must have missed you down there! /me smiles with a smug look. MrN 16:44, Dec 20

Miss this! /me whips away manhole cover and watches MrN9500 plummet past... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Dam it sure smells funny down here. :( MrN 16:53, Dec 20

Hey! I've been busy, I haven't had time to clean in a while, OK? Man, do I come by your house and comment on the tasteless decor? Mind your manners, young man... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 17:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

ha! How's it going, number three?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 16:39)

Ah, you know, busy as hell, with occasional unexpected patches of boredom I fill with visits to Uncyc, and the occasional cameo review. It's a hard life. Nudge nudge. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Led would be proud of your 0.5 for AE Cajek. I feel silly telling you what to do dude, I hope you don't think I'm over stepping the mark... It's just that like you say you do sometimes loose track of how hard it can be to do a good review. I think it's fine for you to go around being the policeman of Pee Review but we must remember to be VERY VERY polite when we do so. The polite thing is really the most important thing here. If we don't do that it will put people off Pee Review anyway, and defeat the point of what we are trying to do... :-) MrN 16:44, Dec 20

I like that you keep me in line, N. HEIL!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 17:33)

Gimme credit for MY article

I started Why?:Give Up cause you didn't and now you turned what was supposed to be a co-op into a monopoly. Please, give it up. You stole most of the content I was going to do when I had the time to work on it. Give me credit too. I started it for ya.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 22:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

First off, I'm glad you like what I did with it. Second of all, it was my idea on my bibliography! Third... Aaaww, I was afraid this would happen!! Where's the Court of Uncyclopedia Custody?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 23:39)

Bring it on Cajek!

YOU UNBELIEVABLE BASTARD!!!Thats why I said let's do a co-op!!!

I censored started it!!!Just check the history!!!

As of this moment, It's war. Were enemies now. All because you couldn't flippin' mention that I had made the red link blue Unfortunately, I cant do your dumb little challenge now, as I am currently procrastinating instead of writing an essay on Herman Melville. And I want my beer back too. __NOCAJEK__-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 00:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I think we need to bring daddy in on this one!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 00:45)

Check out my bibliography! I credited you with starting it, but it's my "flippin'" article!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 00:47)

Too late, I already tore down all my comments of praise of you on my userpage. (Cues sad breakup music). Its okay now, but I'm still pissed off at you. I write a justified pee (a bit harsh, but comprehensive by my standards nonetheless) on an article i didn't think was all that funny and you delete it because I didn't give you the same old "Oh your the mighty Cajek, conquerer of millions, slayer of dragons deserves a solid 8.5 on humor because he is...well...um...Cajek, destroyer of worlds, enslaver of the human race". Not every article you write is great. I hate it when you go all ape shit crazy on an article that would be better written in a serious tone with a twist.--__NOCAJEK__ Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 01:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

lol uu, but seriously: I can revert things that... that I made... especially if it's a pee review! Please don't take it seriously, I'm only one Cajek. I'm sorry if I pissed you off, uu. Come back to meeee   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 01:27)

I'll be waiting for you on my talk page, since I don't want a flaming war in your talk. I calmed down, now lets negotiate. Bring a cookie and I MIGHT consider forgiving you.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 01:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Dammit. I was watching and hoping for another pointless ban for Cajek so's I could make more fun of him. Alas you both seem to be too fucking friendly with each other. Where's the blanking?! The revert wars?! The pitchforks and torches and chainsaws?! What the fuck kind of entertainment is this? (changes channel) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:05 Dec 21, 2007

No no, wait, I think one of them is about to make a personal attack! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:08, Dec 21

YOU SUCK Bozoboy!!! BRING IT ON!!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 04:13)

grabs a ring-side seat, pulls out a bag of popcorn, and waits for the 'teasers' to end.

Aye! A fight ye wants? A fight ye gets! '. "I be blowin' up ye talk page!"

Unknown_user attacks with explosives (conveniently placed near the ring)

"BOOM"

350 Damage done to Cajek

I was going to blank it...but...you know...I could get banned...and I'm not very good at being banned...unlike you...

Ah...now Im bored. Do an actual co-op tomorrow? Without all the edit conflicts I hope?-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 08:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)