| Article: Old People
|
Score: -2
|
| Nominated by:
|
Mattndan 10:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 1
|
No for votes
|
Against: 3
|
- Nah It's a list with weak text. Needs work. Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think this will be deleted pretty quickly from VFH. Esp as Mattndan hasn't voted or said why it should be here.--
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 Against. Queue cleaning -Hum- Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 13:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)- Against. Nope. --UU - natter
 14:02, Jul 20
|
| Comments
|
- Simply nomming an article doesn't qualify as a for vote, let alone two for votes. and why did he nom it in the first place? Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I agree with Modus on this - the act of nomming infers you are for it, and so counts as one vote. Any other way lies madness. Fortunately, in this case, it maketh not a jot of difference. --UU - natter 14:02, Jul 20
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
