RFV discussion: July 2022–January 2023

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Latin. I could find no record of "apella" being used as a common noun in Latin, or with the meaning "little bee". The PHI Latin Texts corpus and Logeion's dictionary index only show the existence of a proper noun "Apella". If this exists as a word, it seems it must be new Latin (and so should be marked accordingly), but I haven't seen a sign yet that it is used as anything other than a taxonomic specific name.--Urszag (talk) 13:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looking more closely at the history of the entry, it looks like it was created by SemperBlotto who describes it as an "assumption" (User_talk:Pengo/Archive_0#pongo). I don't see any particular reason why a primate should be named after a bee and I find Pongo's speculation that "apella = small ape" more plausible; in any case, there seems to be little evidence that this was ever used as a real word in Latin and not just as a taxonomic name. I added an entry for another unrelated word found in dictionaries but I'm not sure if it's real either, or just a "ghost word".--Urszag (talk) 02:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
RFV failed. I removed the RFV template and moved the specific name to a Translingual header, and noted that it may come from Swedish apa (Linnaeus was Swedish).--Urszag (talk) 03:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply