Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 13

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< July 12 July 14 >

July 13

edit

Template:2011 Irish general election

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All three should be substituted onto the respective articles where it is used per the standard on the Irish general and presidential election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Irish election summary begin

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused as no article about Irish elections use these templates or the template coding for the summary/results. These may have been created as a test. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Legend4

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scarcely used template redundant to {{Legend}}. It implements the entire thing as a table, which comes with a bunch of accessibility concerns as this isn't how table are supposed to be used. --Trialpears (talk) 21:48, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Italy Elections

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are for elections for regional areas in Italy which should not be on their own templates, but rather transcluded onto the article where it is used. The last two 2018 templates are used on the wrong article as the article for the elections in those provinces use different tables. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete the first six as unnecessary single-use templates. Subst onto the election articles and use #section function on the other articles for the final two, then delete. Number 57 21:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Gibraltar by-election

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that don't have any chance of being updated. The by-election should be substituted as well as the 2003 and 2007 templates. The 2011 and 2015 are redundant as the 2011 and 2015 articles use a different table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portuguese legislative election, 1985

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These should be substituted on the articles these are used on per the standard on Portugal election articles since these are single-use and won't be updated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:California ballot propositions by year

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template can be replaced with {{Navseasoncats}} with no need for manual parameters. Gonnym (talk) 21:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Slovak parliamentary election, 2010 complete results

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 2010 parliamentary template should be substituted onto the respective mainspace per the standard on other Slovak Parliamentary election articles. Substitute the 2009 Presidential election onto the 2009 election article per the standard on other Slovak presidential election articles. The 2019 template is unused as the 2019 article uses a different table. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MCDDI

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 21. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LOL Rosters

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused league of legends rooster template which seems to have never been used as team tables use different styles. Gonnym (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to {{Hide in print}} and family (TfD) these were used by the Offline Content Generator which used to render Wikipedia books and pdfs of individual articles. In 2017 however this system was abandoned and these templates became unusable. I've checked transclusions for each and every one and they are all unused, except for a handful obvious test pages.

These templates were used instead of the normal template when generating a pdf version, usually to remove elements that didn't make sense when in print. The way to do that now is using {{noprint}}.

I also included the three print subpages outside template space, all for the signpost, if there are venue objections I'm happy to move it to MfD, but I don't see any good reason to fork this discussion. --Trialpears (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: related category Category:Templates with print versions. Also, Module:Documentation will need to be updated if print sub-pages aren't needed anymore. Gonnym (talk) 13:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox American political party

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox political party. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox American political party with Template:Infobox political party.
WP:TFD#REASONS #2, WP:INFOCOL. Redundant to Template:Infobox political party, which has more parameters. Usage is low—this template is not being used for the articles on any major American political parties. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support if it is rarely used, and has less parameters, then makes no sense to have it, fully support merging it! B. M. L. Peters (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I support merging if it's Template:Infobox political party that's being kept. -- The Hammer of Thor (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Hammer of Thor, yes, that's what's being proposed. The other way would break tens of thousands of articles. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:48, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SBS Transit

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template contained only a logo file, and that file has been deleted from Commons. The template should have been substed long ago, but now it is empty and unused. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 1 track listing

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary with so few songs from the album having articles and the ones with articles being listed in the {{The Hunger Games}} navbox. This is per the template documentation in Template:Infobox song#Track listing examples. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_July_13&oldid=1070534644"