Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< June 22 June 24 >

June 23

edit

Template:13th LS members from Uttarakhand

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 1. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bus route maps/lists

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 1. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Talk page info

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Banner holder. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 21:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Talk page info with Template:Banner holder.
These templates have the same function (collapsing lesser talk page banners). Let's merge them for consolidation. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 20:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New York City Ballet repertory talk in brief

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox, containing only red links, 9 years after creation TheImaCow (talk) 18:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Request on Shamsheer Vayalil

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, seems not very useful anymore TheImaCow (talk) 18:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nation at the Central American Games

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox containing only red links TheImaCow (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CURRENTYEAR and Template:CURRENTMONTHABBREV

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to identically named {{CURRENTYEAR}} and {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} magic words, respectively. No need for template versions as they take no parameters. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They date from a time where there was still no such magic templates in MediaWiki (or there were some issues). They have been in wide use (even if you may have replaced them now by the magic templates). No problem for deleting now as long as there are no longer any reference to them. At that time they were needed indirectly by various date formaters as the templates were more complex. verdy_p (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't have to replace these two templates anywhere, there is literally no way to use them, as the magic word will always take precedence unless you put in a bogus parameter (e.g. {{CURRENTYEAR|null}}). ----Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think it's quite useful to have the documentation for users who want to learn more about the magic words. A template like this is zero maintenance and I can't really see a good reason for deletion. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 16:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt Help:Magic words provides the help. The template will just cause confusion - if it's ever altered in any way either the parser uses the template - in which case the template is needlessly adding to the overhead and deceiving editors who expect the magic word's behaviour - or the magic word - in which case the poor schmuck editing the template is wasting their time. Retaining templates which duplicate the magic words is only storing up trouble. Cabayi (talk) 19:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to {{CURRENTYEAR}} and {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} - Both templates are currently being used however that could probably be fixed with AWB, Anyway the redirect would be of help to those unaware of the MAGICWORDS. –Davey2010Talk 14:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Davey2010: Neither template is being used (see here and here, the single "transclusion" is an artifact of a lua module preprocessing this nomination page). Any attempt to transclude them would use the magic words instead of the template unless a bogus parameter is used (neither takes a parameter). A redirect would similarly go unused. --Ahecht (TALK
      PAGE      ) 17:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi Ahecht, I'm so sorry! - I'd completely forgot not all magicwords use "__" which I thought they did, It's been a very long time since I used MAGICWORDS or even looked at that page to be perfectly honest with you so apologies for that
Delete as per nom - Templates aren't being used and unlikely to ever be used due to brackets doing the same thing!. –Davey2010Talk 18:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

NRL-Teams-Templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of them are currently unused, and contain only a single link. TheImaCow (talk) 16:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Transwa templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are now deprecated and are no longer transcluded after the transition to {{Adjacent stations}}. – McVahl (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mayors of Banja Luka

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, contains no links TheImaCow (talk) 15:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Volleyballbox

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused * Pppery * it has begun... 15:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Transperth trains templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are now deprecated and are no longer transcluded after the transition to {{Adjacent stations}}. – McVahl (talk) 11:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ICI

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless navbox, which groups articles in relation to Islamic Community of India, a poor-quality article which redirected to Islam in India. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Music eras

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 June 30. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

S-line/Transperth templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All Transperth Trains stations have been converted to use {{Adjacent stations}}, and to deprecate {{s-line}}. – McVahl (talk) 10:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_23&oldid=965543937"