Wikipedia:Neutrality through accuracy
Essay on editing Wikipedia
This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: Accuracy is often the best way to achieve neutrality and resolve disputes |
- Why it works:
- Because when editors can agree on simple raw facts, it can become a stepping stone for agreeing on one more thing, and so on.
See also
edit- Wikipedia:WikiProject Neutrality
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/FAQ
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Examples
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Handling neutrality disputes
- Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
- Wikipedia:NPOV dispute
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/BCE-CE Debate
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/News/January_2011/Editorials
- Wikipedia:Disputed statement
- Wikipedia:Disruptive editing
- Wikipedia:List of controversial issues
- Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems
|
Wikipedia key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||