Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 17

July 17

File:Angelina Lauro (former Oranje).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A free alternative, File:"Angelina Lauro" - Tilbury, 1976.jpg, exists and is in the article. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For info, this image published by or for Linea C (Costa), and copyright A.G.I.S.SpA, Avegno, Genova. - Davidships (talk) 21:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused and superseded. Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 20:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep But I would modify the rationale to "To illustrate the MS Oranje during its time as a Costa Line cruise ship". In fact, I think that if only a single use can be permitted, the case for use in Costa Cruises is stronger. That is an article of greater general interest and where the image coverage of the whole historic fleet suffers from a few omissions. - Davidships (talk) 23:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Textbook WP:NFCC#1 violation. There is not one, but multiple freely licensed equivalents in the article. -Fastily 21:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thepleasuregarden1.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:The Pleasure Garden (1925) - poster.jpg on Commons. Ineligible for WP:CSD#F8 as they are not exact copies. ✗plicit 00:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Orphaned version is also of horrible quality. Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 20:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Despite it's poor resolution, image may be useful as a reference to restore the Commons poster, whose lighting contrast due to wrapping looks horrible in thumbnail. --Mayimbú (talk) 02:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EHF European Cup 2024.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFC#UUI17 since this logo is identical to the one used on the main event: File:EHF European Cup 2023.png. Jonteemil (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator reasoning. Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 20:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EHF European Cup 2024 2.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFC#UUI17 since this logo is identical to the one used on the main event: File:EHF European Cup 2023.png. Jonteemil (talk) 10:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator reasoning, same as above. Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 20:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roblox game screenshot.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn -Fastily 21:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need to determine whether or not the article Roblox needs a screenshot for visual identification. AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 16:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also is this a valid reason for putting a file under discussion? AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 16:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the venue for that, this is meant to be the file equivalent of WP:Articles for deletion. The proper venue would've been the talk page for the Roblox article since this is a content dispute. λ NegativeMP1 17:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe a better photo would be of something such as the main page of the website or their logo. TaxidermyMan (talk) 17:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think both would be good, as I still believe we need identification about what a game would look like. AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we've come to an agreement that we're happy with. Keep AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 23:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be closed now? AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 23:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marshalsea-wall-December2007.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is located on Commons but it has not been deleted because uploader added a {{Keep local}}. The file is not used on the front page or heavily used so that is not the reason for the Keep local.

According to a message from 2008 the reason is that some files once were deleted on Commons. Especially if they were related to sensitive topics like animal rights. Therefore uploader liked to have files local to be able to monitor them.

Sadly the uploader User:SlimVirgin is deceased since more than three years ago so she can no longer monitor the files even if they are local. So the reason for the keep local is no longer there. I noticed that user did not object to a PROD of file 14 January 2021 so perhaps se did no longer worry so much.

Files with a keep local can’t be deleted per CSD F8 but should be nominated for deletion. Per other discussions like files uploaded by Spinningspark in Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2024_April_24#File:4-cube_4^4.png and the other discussions mentioned there, files can be deleted even if it has a keep local if uploader is no longer active and there is no other reason to keep it.

SlimVirgin have uploaded more files with a keep local and many of those are most likely on Commons so just like with the files uploaded by Spinningspark I suggest that the files can be deleted via a PROD so users can protest if they have good reasons to keep a file. MGA73 (talk) 16:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newbury Park and Conejo Mountain twilight.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image already exists at commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Newbury_Park_and_Conejo_Mountain_twilight_during_Springs_Fire.jpg Ternera (talk) 21:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Local version is only even being used on the userpage of the uploader (who is eight years inactive). Furthermore, the uploader of the Commons version is the same user, with an identical timestamp. Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 20:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.