Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 January 6

Wikipedia:Administrative action review – Procedural close: MfD reopened by closer. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

The closer was involved and is already blowing off a request to reopen. No good will come from short circuiting this discussion so can someone uninvolved reopen it please? Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll re-open it in the hope of someone uninvolved coming to the same conclusion. I'd say Wbm1058 has already, but I'll just move out of this entirely and it can be re-closed properly. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse close This is a completely unnecessary DRV. Process for process' sake... Beeblebrox (talk) 21:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Meh The request to reopen Spartaz is referring to is here. I don't think "blowing off" my request is accurate. I agree they were semi-involved, but on reflection, I don't think there's anything to be gained by this. It seems impossible to imagine the MFD closing as other than "procedural close" or "no consensus". --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's open again. If I understand correctly, the main concern, if not perhaps the only reasonable one, is about my involvement at WP:RFA2021/P#Passed:_6C_Administrative_action_review. Fair point: So if someone uninvolved comes to the same conclusion, I hope it's fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.