Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Te voy a enseñar a querer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 23:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Te voy a enseñar a querer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail notability, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2012.

PROD removed with "try afd" and zero improvements/citations or anything else to support notability. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Colombia. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can no find no significant coverage on the series to demonstrate notability. – Meena • 09:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Didn't seem very hard to find articles about this telenovela, including the Spanish language version of this article including a citation that it was listed in Radio Times Magazine as #4 of their top ten list, probably some time around July 2006.[1]. There are articles about how this series was a launching point for several successful actors, from 2019 [2], an article about the work environment of the series, from 2017, [3], an article about an independent network was going to rebroadcast the popular series, [4], and I stopped looking. I'm not a fan of telenovelas, so I won't be editing this article myself, but it looks like it meets WP:GNG to me. RecycledPixels (talk) 16:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Recycled Pixels' sources and NEXIST. matt91486 (talk) 00:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per RecycledPixels comments and additional sources - Navarre0107 (talk) 00:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.