Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swayam Infotainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swayam Infotainment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable production company. No sources in article, very few independent sources come up in a search. Chuka Chief (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Z1720 (talk) 22:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Z1720 (talk) 22:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Z1720 (talk) 22:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. I only found one possible source [1], but it doesn't have an author and I couldn't find the website's masthead, so I don't think it's a WP:RS. No other references were found in a Google, JSTOR, ProQuest or NYT search. Z1720 (talk) 22:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't know why this doesn't have a G11 tag on it. --◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 23:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as G11 per the above — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Google search of Swayam Infotainment followed by pratibha advani brings up a few reliable sources [2][3] with only brief mentions and the subject still does not meet the criteria for a stand-alone article.Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:NOTINHERITED, and WP:SIGCOV. See these two very brief mentions. Bearian (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.