Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Bryant-Woolridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Linuxbeak | Talk 00:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lori Bryant-Woolridge

This page is one of a circular set of self-refential non-notable (low google hit count) bios, all of which have a family relationship and have been created in the last couple of weeks

There's also a set of redirects for various forms of each of the names. Josh Parris # 06:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep assuming copyright situation is handled. Remember to unwikify any links to NN persons. -- Egil 11:55, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject seems notable enough to me. The copywright issue must be taken care of. Logophile 13:23, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the only one in the bunch that is notable... as long as someone rewrites it so that it is not Copyvio. Even if permission is obtained for this copy, it needs to be rewritten to strike some of the non-notable wiki's and references. Could also use some POV adjustment.--Isotope23 18:08, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as long as the copyvio issue is rectified. Hall Monitor 18:23, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: A GFDL version of this article is now available at Lori Bryant-Woolridge/Temp if this will help expedite the removal of the copyvio. Hall Monitor 21:42, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep this please it has been rewritten so it is fine now Yuckfoo 00:09, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Obviously notable based on precedents for authors (circulation, etc.) Both books are from major publishing houses and are sold on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Books-A-Million. There are also several user reviews on Amazon from a wide variety of locations. I suspect the copywrite issue is moot, as this appears to be the standard bio circulated by publishers to the press, etc. exactly for this purpose. el_amante 19:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.