Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Mora (blogger)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete a little earle because it's snowing. Geschichte (talk) 15:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Mora (blogger)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The blogger seems to handily fail WP:GNG, a quick google search didn't bring up the subject, and most of the references on the page are dead. Ortizesp (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Blatant self-promotion. The subject's blog is named "The In List", and the page was created by User:Theinlist. Zacwill (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE and pretty much every Wikipedia notability guideline by some distance. Clearly autobiographical and promotional - the only source that mentions the subject is his own blog, which is no longer in existence anyway. All the other sources are an attempt at notability by WP:INHERITED means, but don't mention the subject at all, never mind any in-depth coverage. Richard3120 (talk) 01:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per rationale provided by Richard3120, Zacwill & by the nom, Ortizesp. I concur with their assessment. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage at all in reliable sources, which is sufficient to doom the article. Its autobiographical nature doesn't help. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable blogger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above, and because the sourcing is terrible, especially for a BLP. Bearian (talk) 21:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.