Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Voices (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:54, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Voices

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. In the previous AfD no one was able to even provide a source that has more than a trivial mention let alone multiple sources. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Previous discussion was closed "no consensus", almost entirely because of a single person who argued that BCAST criteria were met while completely ignoring the fact that passing BCAST isn't a matter of saying that the topic passes BCAST, but of the quality and depth of the reliable sources that can or can't be shown to independently verify that the topic passes BCAST. Notability-supporting coverage was lacking the first time, and hasn't improved since. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. not enough news coverage. Lesliechin1 (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to CJLY-FM#Programming. Fails WP:RPRGM per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 03:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.