Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvi (tribe)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G5'd it, created by LTA. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Alvi (tribe)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Alvi (tribe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is pretty much artificial, claiming there are Sunni Alevis. Also the user is putting Turkic peoples category every time. Such thing doesn't exist. Source 2, 3, 4 and 5 may show like such people (?) is actual, but all these texts are copy pastes from other articles mainly Alevi. Especially the infobox looks ridiculous. It should be deleted, pure original research. Beshogur (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

There are many Alvis, who were reverted to Sunniism please don't contest this speedy deletion. Linguafocus (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Was created by a now banned sock of a long term abuser. Gotitbro (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.