Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action of 16 April 1695
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Action of 16 April 1695 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
I think this battle never happened Filiep 21:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It probably didn't happen. From the article HMS Intrepid: "The first Intrepid was a third rate ship of the line captured from the French in 1747" -- before the supposed date of this battle in which Intrepid was captured by the French. -- Bpmullins | Talk 16:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverified. From above, it appears that it would be impossible to verify. If somehow it should be, then the title needs a drastic change. Agent 86 19:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V unless historical sources can be found. Walton monarchist89 19:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keepas SpookyMulder (talk · contribs) appears to be an editor in good standing who continues to edit naval historical articles, so I don't think it's a hoax. It may not be notable, however, so we should ask for references. --Dhartung | Talk 22:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Changing vote to delete after e-mail with author, who assents to deletion. --Dhartung | Talk 08:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.