Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Tale of the Forest Giant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg jhp jm 01:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Tale of the Forest Giant

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not appear to have received notable coverage in English or Russian (WP:GNG).--RTY9099 (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it apparently does have enough sources to meet inclusion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The references only mention of the film, no detailed review.--RTY9099 (talk) 04:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 04:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has coverage in reliable sources, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.