Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/60 Wrap$$

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

60 Wrap$$

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Painfully non-notable rapper, vague puffery notwithstanding. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete blatant self promotion from single purpose editor. LibStar (talk) 04:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable.*Treker (talk) 10:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, promotional article for a non-notable subject. GAB^Hello! 13:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional article. -- Ben Ben ^(talk) 18:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliable sources, no charting songs/albums, not on a major label, etc. Sergecross73 msg me 20:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: entirely promotional article including a bad case of name-dropping. Not a shred of evidence of notability. Please delete. Fylbecatulous talk 12:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.