Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ ×

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus seems clear DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

×

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about an album that's not even announced yet. No legitimate source to prove its existence. Rizhopper (talk) 13:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - wp:TOOSOON and wp:cball both apply here. Margalob (talk) 15:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: definite WP:TOOSOON, but will almost certainly be notable enough in a month or two to have its own article if that release date is correct, so I wonder if a redirect to Martin Garrix would be the best option for now. Richard3120 (talk) 21:42, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed but at this moment, we don't even know if the article name is real. No announcement have been made about the name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rizhopper (talk • contribs) 09:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very good point actually - there's been no official confirmation of the album title, so the article title could be wrong. Richard3120 (talk) 15:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy / Draftify as WP:TOOSOON. I searched and found sites of unclear reliability saying this is the name of an upcoming album. I also found official Martin Garrix self-source using " x" that seem to suggest this is the title of the next album. However I didn't see anything sufficiently firm, and the current article has zero content. It seems almost pointless to delete and recreate the page, but this does not belong in article-space yet. Alsee (talk) 08:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Empty article except for the infobox, infobox says "Peace Is the Mission" for some reason and there is no coverage to be found except for vague statements about an upcoming album from the artist. There is "enough" coverage of the vague statements, however, so that makes this a bit trickier. Yet it's all so vague that it really just warrants a mention at the artist's article. It's WP:TOOSOON for the album to have an article of its own, especially in this style. Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - wp:TOOSOON and wp:cball as already stated above. Aoba47 (talk) 21:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.