Theo F
Hey there. I noticed that you moved French Wikipedia to French Language Wikipedia. I reverted that move, not solely because I don't agree with it, but because there are many other articles about the different wikipedias - as you can see by the corresponding category - and they are all namend in the same way. So I think it would be better to propose a name change for all of these articles instead of just renaming one. --Conti|✉ 17:12, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Yes but what do you think is better? "French Wikipedia" as it was, "French speaking Wikipedia", "Francophone Wikipedia", or as I suggested, "French Language Wikipedia"?--Theo F 18:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Personally, I prefer "French Wikipedia". I think it's the most commonly used term, and to me it's also the best sounding of the selection. --Conti|✉ 18:53, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Although it might be the most commonly used, this term unfortunately implies a francocentric ideology and for that reason is not quite NPOV. In the articles of the French language Wikipédia, we try as far as possible to provide the relevent information for readers from France, but also from Belgium, Switzerland, Québec, and I wish in the future there could be more information for users form the French-speaking African countries. There might not be the same problem for - say - the Japanese Wikipedia, because most Japanese speakers are indeed Japanese. --Theo F 15:06, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Hmm, I now understand why you changed the article name. But doesn't "French Wikipedia" mean "Wikipedia for the French language", and not "for the French people"? True, it's not really clear, but if the page should be moved to a more clear and NPOV article name, all the other articles should also be moved, and therefore I think you should propose the move one a talk page (I'm not really sure which one is the best to be honest), to gather some consensus on this. --Conti|✉ 22:35, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
- On fr.wikipedia.org, I think there is a genuine intention to make the articles friendly for people from outside France. So I suppose that if a poll was organized most people on fr.wikipedia.org would be in favour of stressing the francophone character of the project in a way or other. The reaction in an other language community might be different. May be we could keep things as they are now. Time will tell if more people here on en.wikipedia.org share views similar to mine. Theo F 14:38, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Hmm, I now understand why you changed the article name. But doesn't "French Wikipedia" mean "Wikipedia for the French language", and not "for the French people"? True, it's not really clear, but if the page should be moved to a more clear and NPOV article name, all the other articles should also be moved, and therefore I think you should propose the move one a talk page (I'm not really sure which one is the best to be honest), to gather some consensus on this. --Conti|✉ 22:35, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Although it might be the most commonly used, this term unfortunately implies a francocentric ideology and for that reason is not quite NPOV. In the articles of the French language Wikipédia, we try as far as possible to provide the relevent information for readers from France, but also from Belgium, Switzerland, Québec, and I wish in the future there could be more information for users form the French-speaking African countries. There might not be the same problem for - say - the Japanese Wikipedia, because most Japanese speakers are indeed Japanese. --Theo F 15:06, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Personally, I prefer "French Wikipedia". I think it's the most commonly used term, and to me it's also the best sounding of the selection. --Conti|✉ 18:53, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
I have a little maisonette in France (no article about it) and you'r welcome. I would be happy you accept my invitation. If you are from Paris it's easy to come: it's in Merry-sur-Yonne and you can find a train station Châtel-Censoir (no articles). I'm sure we can have have fun and you will be friendly with some friends I have. I will show you the wonderful litlle Churh from Druyes-les-Belles-Fontaines and more.My phone is 0666264732. If you have no enouth money tu use a phone you can find my email. Petrusbarbygere 06:57, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hello
You wrote : update: Images with this tag will eventually have to be deleted http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:PD-Flag&diff=264894&oldid=258296
I am considering using commons:Image:Kentucky state flag.png on the French Language Wikipedia. Do you think it is not a wise thing to do?--Theo F 18:21, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I don't think the flag will get deleted any time soon. dbenbenn | talk 20:56, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Noinclude on Milestone statistics page
editCan you please explain the purpose of the "noinclude" part of this line
<noinclude>[[fr:modèle:Statistiques des Wikipédias]]</noinclude>
which you added to Wikipedia:Milestone statistics? - dcljr (talk) 06:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Hakura Tsunenaga
editHi Theo F. The quotes are from the book "Marcouin, Francis and Keiko Omoto. Quand le Japon s'ouvrit au monde. Paris: Découvertes Gallimard, 1990. ISBN 207053118X." (pages 114-116). Best regards PHG 12:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Allegations of Northern Irish apartheid
editGood job on the new article, perhaps you would like to see the new one I created Allegations of Puerto Rican apartheid, maybe we can help improve both of these articles Bleh999 10:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,Newyorkbrad 18:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
List of cities in the Americas with alternative names
edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of cities in the Americas with alternative names, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of cities in the Americas with alternative names. —BradV 03:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of cities in the Americas with alternative names
editI have nominated List of cities in the Americas with alternative names, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities in the Americas with alternative names. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —BradV 04:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Pomodorovaticansphere.jpg nominated for speedy deletion
edit
WTF?! I didn't realise you needed copyright to take a photo of a public sculpture. Surely Pomodoro's getting free publicity to sell his identical sculptures for ridiculous amounts of money but then i guess that's not the point... Anyway, will you give me a link to where on Wikipedia it says you can't take pics of public sculptures (I couldn't find anything myself on the image policy pages - maybe something needs to be added) and then do whatever you gotta do. Cheers. extraordinary (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Social structure by country
editI have nominated Category:Social structure by country (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Social class by country (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Octane (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hakalau, Hawaii
editI really like the picture; good job :-) Nyttend (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
editHello and thank you for notifying me about your response to my question at Commons. LovesMacs (talk) 18:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
French Prisoners of War at Agincourt
editBonjour, That was an interesting addition you made to Prisoner of War. When you get a chance, would you please add a reference for the addition? I didn't want to clutter up the article with a fact tag. Merci beaucoup, --4wajzkd02 (talk) 14:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you, that was information of which I was not aware. Cheers, --4wajzkd02 (talk) 16:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
DYK for MV Delta Mariner
edit | On 10 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article MV Delta Mariner, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the cargo ship MV Delta Mariner (pictured), which struck a bridge over the Tennessee River in January 2012, transports rocket parts from the manufacturer in Alabama to Cape Canaveral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/MV Delta Mariner.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 14
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ganda Iso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Songhai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of List of cities in the Americas with alternative names for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cities in the Americas with alternative names is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities in the Americas with alternative names (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Theo F. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Theo F. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Theo F. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Spirit of Vatican II for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spirit of Vatican II, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit of Vatican II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)