TattelTales1

Afro-Puerto Rican

Notice - What is wrong with you? We know that you are a sockpupet of User: AllStarSun1. You habe been told that by creating a page "Afro-Puerto Rican" and pasting the intellectual work and creation of another (myself) "African immigration to Puerto Rico" and taking the credit, you are not only violating Wikipedia policy, but you are also committing plagiarism which is against the law. The "African immigration to Puerto Rico" is part of a Puerto Rican immigration series and covers the history of the Africans in our island way before the island became known as Puerto Rico and our people Puerto Ricans. Therefore, please refrain from doing this in the future especially to an article such as this which has a "GA" status or you may be blocked from editing. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

im not his sockpuppet, and you cant give yourself full credit, being that over half the edits is from other editors

Quack. We have CheckUser if you think you can fool us.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:43, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AllStarSun1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:43, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Smh stupid bitches

Please do not make personal attacks on other people, and be civil and formal.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marine 69-71

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marine 69-71, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

so if u cant give me credit and let me give this article more actual knowledge, then take EVERYTHING i did on this article off, that includes AllStarSun1, DatPersonUDontKno, TattelTales1, and 68.194.239.60

So you do admit to sockpuppetry. I'm now going to have all your accounts and your IP blocked.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

so is there anything really wrong with having multiple accounts??

It is forbidden, and I've warned you repeatedly about this.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

alright so how about this, i take off everything i did to his article off, and create my own article, and i wont do this sockpuppet thing again

Well, first you need to return to your original account, and explain this to the blocking administrator if and/or when you get blocked.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

In the article "African immigration to Puerto Rico", the "Current Demographics" section was ALL done by me, so if you're going to block me, atleast take that off, i dont want him to get credit for something i took my time into doing

It says below the edit box, (albeit in small text), "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. All text you did not write yourself, except brief excerpts, must be available under terms consistent with Wikipedia's Terms of Use before you submit it."Jasper Deng (talk) 06:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

so if yall dont want me editing or "vandilising", why you keeping my edits on?

Not all your edits are disruptive, but the fact that you had disruptive edits is no excuse for this. I'm asking an administrator to remove your talk page access because you are just wasting my time.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

If you go to WP:AN and search for "Sock abusing talk page", you will see that the responding administrator decided not to remove your talk page access. Nyttend (talk) 13:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sock abusing talk page. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TattelTales1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm honestly going to follow the rules and greatly contribute

Decline reason:

You have admitted that this account is a sock - you need to request unblock on your original account -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.