Malqrrishh

resolution and date for File:Neetha and Zafar.jpg

Hi There Malqrrishh, I was wondering if you could upload the original photo of this, rather than this downsized version. Higher resolution images are always better. Also is the date correct, you have listed the creation date as yesterday ? Is this the date the photo was taken or the date you last edited it ? Usually the date listed here is the date the photo was taken. All the best - Peripitus (Talk) 11:21, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Malqrrishh. You have new messages at Vianello's talk page.
Message added 18:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Feel free to delete this notice. - Vianello (Talk) 18:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Viraj Dobriyal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viraj Dobriyal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viraj Dobriyal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChanderForYou 10:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Viraj Dobriyal. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 14:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Language in films

The English used in RA.One is extremely less than the Hindi used. And it is not even marketed as an English film. Also, a film's original language only should be used in the infobox, not the languages it was dubbed in. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Why don't you open a consensus on the talk page of each article? Also, I have no idea abt the Taare Zameen Par thing. I saw it in Hindi, and it had less English. "Like Stars on Earth" might have been the English dubbed version, or just the international title. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Please take a few minutes to read WP:CONSENSUS. It's extremely obvious that you don't have a clue how that term is used here on Wikipedia. Read it. Learn. And hopefully you'll be able to productively discuss this on the article talk page. First suggestion, find a RELIABLE SOURCE. And no, IMDB does not count. Second suggestion, READ the comments previously made, especially the part where the purpose of the Language section of the info box is discussed. Ravensfire (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Syra and Shehroz.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Syra and Shehroz.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMS ^Talk 08:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Ra.One

Please read through the discussion on the Ra.One talk page about the language. Note that the parameter in the infobox is the primary language of the film, not every language used in the film. Multiple sources (bollywoodhungama and bbfc.uk.co) support Hindi only and they are both noted on the talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Ra.One language

Please use the Ra.One talk page to discuss the infobox language parameter. There is already an existing discussion here with several points that may be relevant. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Use. The. Article. Talk. Page. Yes, I know I'm talking to yet another TJK sock. So it's not like you've been told this before. There's a nice little tab/link on Ra.One page that says Talk. Click on it. Down at the bottom, you'll see a discussion on this. Read it, especially noting the parts about how the Language parameter should be used, that IMDB is not a reliable source and what multiple reliable sources say about the primary language of the film. Then, click on Edit and add your thoughts. Remember to support your view with sources and policy. Hint - IMDB is not a reliable source and other pages doesn't work. Ravensfire (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

And the BBFC source - that's (oddly enough) a reliable source showing that Hindi is the only primary language of the film. Shock! Gasp! Amazement! I've actually got good, reliable sources backing my view? And you're the one pulling out garbage sources? Say it ain't so! Ravensfire (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Malqrrishh reported by User:Kailash29792 (Result: ). Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ra.One. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shazia Afgan

The article Shazia Afgan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Harsh (talk) 14:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Naila Jaffery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naila Jaffery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naila Jaffery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harsh (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Viraj Dobriyal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Viraj Dobriyal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mumbai125kms3d.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mumbai125kms3d.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Life Ise Gale Laga Le

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Life Ise Gale Laga Le requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 11:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of World Cupp 2011 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Cupp 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Cupp 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seraphim System ^(talk) 10:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Golmaal pic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Golmaal pic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Special 26 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Special 26 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)