JDAWiseman

Welcome!

Hello, JDAWiseman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Quoting a news story verbatim

Hi JDAWiseman. I was intrigued by your recent edit to the article Kariba Dam. My understanding that quoting so much copyrighted material may not be acceptable per the WikiPedia policy, even though it is attributed. Would it not be better to just paraphrase the facts that belong in the article?My Gussie (talk) 20:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

I felt that it was fair usage of a modest portion of the tail end of an article. If you disagree, edit away. — JDAWiseman (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Concern over the potential failure of the Kariba dam

I have been researching this subject over the last week and read many articles in this regard. I get the impression that undue weight is being placed by the media on the fact that the dam and the people living downstream of it may be in peril. It also seems to me that the Zambian government is raising the profile of this issue to get more funds to repair it. Would you agree with this? For balance, would it not be better to also write something in the article making the opposing point that failure of the dam might not be so likely?My Gussie (talk) 20:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

I have read only the linked article, so defer to your expertise. But do move this entire talk section into the talk page of the dam article. — JDAWiseman (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Sale of Charles Trafford's property from Hothorpe Hall

Hello Julian. I saw your note about the sale on 19 March 1931 of Charles de Trafford's property from Hothorpe Hall. You mentioned "My picture 21928". Is this image available somewhere to view? As you say, maybe the sale doesn't merit much coverage in the Charles de Trafford article, but it would be interesting to see what was sold. Rupert Clayton (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Replied via email. Thanks. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

"misplaced wording"...what misplaced wording?

I noticed your edit and 57 byte drop in text on the chernobyl page. Though I can't spurce the wording you are referring to in the edit summary. It seems a paragraph break, unseen by readers, was reduced. Was the break visible? As you have me thinking that text was lost or grossly misplaced. Boundarylayer (talk) 23:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Please post in talk page for that article. JDAWiseman (talk) 23:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JDAWiseman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 185.176.160.84. Place any further information here. Recently switched to new ISP, G.Network. JDAWiseman (talk) 18:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. I cannot unblock you because this account is not blocked directly. Yes, you are on a blocked range. You can do two things about it: edit from some other device unaffected by the block, and/or go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Uncited addition

Hi, I saw you added new content to JSON, but didn't cite a source. I went ahead and added one, but in the future, please make sure you cite all content you add, in order to fulfill Wikipedia's verifiability policy, even if you link to an article that includes citations. Thanks.

By the way, two things: 1) Since Ion in its text form is a superset of JSON, it might be better to move it to the Supersets section. 2) Ion is already mentioned in the See also, so I'd recommend merging that info into your addition.

Cheers. — W.andrea (talk) 23:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)