User talk:DragonflySixtyseven/Archive15

QUESTION RE STAVROS BROTHERS ARTICLE (JUST DELETED)

Hi. Just noticed that my just-created article for the band Stavros Brothers has been deleted. I'm not sure why - the band is legitimate, is part of the Melbourne music scene, has released a CD and has played live shows. I was not able to, as suggested, add the 'hangon' tag to the article because it has already been deleted.

Any follow-up would be much appreciated. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmozzle (talk • contribs) 13:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Redirecting

Hey! I am writing about UYDO and I see you redirected the UYDO page to United Youth Development Organization - first of all: Thank You :). Secondly, I was wondering how I change the original page from Uydo to UYDO (ie, all capitals)?? Regards... Chris! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chylland (talk • contribs) 15:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Question

Hi. I know you're an administrator, so I hope you can answer this question: Do I have to have been on Wikipedia for a certain amount of time in order to be a good article reviewer? --Hadger 18:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

If you can (I don't expect you to), please answer that question as soon as possible. I'm not trying to rush you, by the way, so don't worry. --Hadger 23:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, I have another question. How come this user and this user are blocked indefinitely? Jondavis142 didn't make any edits (not even in the Abuse Filter, if I'm not mistaken) and 85hypnotoad only made one edit (which is deleted, but I'm still confused). --Hadger 19:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I think I get it... Pages they created were deleted, so those edits aren't shown. --Hadger 19:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Just wanted to thank you for changing my user rights. I try and aid wikipedia and never expect anything, so was very grateful that someone noticed. I keep a low profile on here generally.Donmike10 (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Please change your signature

You are not David Shankbone.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 18:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Where exactly has DragonflySixtyseven signed as David Shankbone? I can't find any contributions with such a signature... Could you please provide diffs? - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I believe it is in reference to the signature saying simply "DS," such as at Category talk:1973 births. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

For the record, I've been around a good two years longer than Shankbone. I had the monogram first. DS (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Ya, I know who you are, but everybody knows David Shankbone. I'm sure other basketball players had the number 23 before His Airness came along, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't retire his jersey. Please, you're confusing people.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

David Shankbone signs as "David Shankbone", and every time you come back you're a liar. DS (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Actually, could you change it? I keep thinking a Nintendo DS has become sentient, and now I'm confused and nervous about Skynet. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

HOLY SHIT IT'S CLEVELAND AMORY BACK FROM THE DEAD! DS (talk) 20:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

MfD

Your comments are being discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Totaldramaman/Contests#User:Totaldramaman.2FContests. Gigs (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

My User Page

Hi. I have a question. Are my fan-fiction things ok on my user page? Please look at it so I'm more specific. Are my predicted TDM (Total Drama, the Musical) eliminations ok, too? Please answer me on my talk page.--Hadger 03:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, please don't delete my user page if it's not. I also have some constructive things on it, so I can just remove the sections (and maybe even ask for other administrator's opinions, even if you say it's ok to have on my user page). --Hadger 03:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For (User rights log); 17:36:39 . . DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) changed rights for User:William M. Connolley from Rollbackers to Rollbackers and Autoreviewers (makes things easier). First I'd heard of this right. New things to learn every day :-) William M. Connolley (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

With regard to MisterWiki

Is it worthwhile adding MisterWiki's restrictions (i.e. MisterWiki is to be checkusered regularly to make sure he uses no undeclared socks, and is to be re-blocked for even a single use thereof. Also, no talking to newbies, because he's too BITE-y) to Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Placed by the Wikipedia community? I am also going to send this message to Drini, as the admin with whom MisterWiki made this agreement. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

• With the approval of yourself and Drini, I have added an entry to Wikipedia:Editing restrictions (see here), detailing the conditions which MisterWiki has accepted. I would be grateful if you could have a quick look at it to ensure that it is accurate. Thanks! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

• There is a conversation about this unblock at ANI, if you would like to provide input regarding the circumstances of the unblock. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Eyes from teh skies

I am in ur skies, using ur innernets, watching u and thinkin' about vandalising ur wikipedias. 12.130.118.7 (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Apology

I am sorry for my excessive use of my user pages, I did not know that they were causing any problems. Where may I download a free MediaWiki interface for my computer? Also, how do I delete these pages and any of my user pages that I've used as drafts for creating new pages? Rik (talk) 20:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

So are you going delete page by page or are you just going to delete everything with the prefix User:Stolilv87? In other words is there something I can put on the top of pages that I want saved or would that just be a waste? Rik (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Renato M. E. Sabbatini

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato M. E. Sabbatini (2nd nomination). You participated in the first AfD. - Eastmain (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

Hi, I noticed you messed with my rights. Do I have to do anything, or is this new right an automatic thing? --TS 20:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Watchmen and Genovese

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Living Downstream (film)

I would like to know why the page I created, Living Downstream (film) was deleted. The reason you gave was "(notability not asserted)" but that really doesn't tell me anything at all. This listing deserves to be published, so please tell me where I went wrong and how I can improve. Thanks. - AMS —Preceding undated comment added 19:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC).

FYI

Just thought you might find this unblock request by a user you blocked a long time ago interesting. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Spacing Question

Your opinion, please. I've been getting rid of double spaces in long articles, but have recently discovered it doesn't affect how the article appears. Is it still good to make everything single spaced, or is it a waste of bandwith making those edits? -WarthogDemon 05:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Good point. Thanks. :) -WarthogDemon 19:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Mova

Hi, I see you deleted an article on the MOVA Globe. I never saw the article, but I am I am curious about this because I invented the Mova globe and am working to make and sell it- Bill French —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.148.140 (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Because what was submitted was 90% advertising and 10% someone's copyrighted review. DS (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Survivor

So I got rid of the stupid articles, and even though I don't see who, exactly, I'm harming by making a separate page away from everything else that doesn't interfere with any other activity on the wiki, you can go ahead and delete them all you want. I'm sure you'll take great pleasure in doing so.

And might I suggest being a little less patronizing next time? SurvivorAdventures (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello DragonflySixtyseven! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 35 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Jeff Bowler - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Jan Strnad - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Phil Moy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the note re:Bedford. I was actually trying to engage him in discussion in a friendly manner - seeing a rather terse and cryptic Oppose on my current RfA, I was trying to learn more about the motivation. I had assumed what he had meant by lynching, but it seemed like a good way to politely open discussion. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Algaebase bot

In the end I think I got fed up of unconstructive criticism and sidelined the project; it's somewhat stamina-sapping so it's ended up pretty low on my list of priorities. I can't remember the details of how I left it, in the end. If I were to resurrect the project it would probably be in a less ambitious "start from scratch" fashion. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 15:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tolu Ajayi

On my talk page, you are apparently referring to Tolu Ajayi. Nine of his books are listed in worldcat, a very useful place to search for basic info on an author. The two that I have checked so far are both held by the NY Public library and several other major libraries, so anyone who visits one of those libraries or uses inter-library loan can at least source to an "about the author" section. In short this was not unverifiable, merely unverified. I have restored since your stated reason for deletion does not apply, and am adding source notes. DES ^(talk) 17:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Copied from User talk:DESiegel.

I think i have found the original source that was used to write this: http://www.scribd.com/doc/11573530/Student-Encyclopedia-of-African-Literature (p 55). Check it out. This is listed in Google books, by the way, although i found it on a straight Google search. And check out the current state of the article. DES ^(talk) 18:46, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Jatapurgovia

Hello. I'm concerned about your summary deletion of the article Jatapurgovia. It appears that you decided it must be a hoax because it was referred to in a story by Stanislaw Lem. Let me say that I'm not an expert in Armenian prehistory, so I can't say whether it actually is a hoax, but it seemed to be well sourced and simply being mentioned in a work of fiction doesnt make it fictional. After all, one of Lem's stories refers to building a tunnel through the star Betelguese. The tunnel presumably is fictitious, the star is not! I really think you should have put the article up for AFD and let experts decide whether or not it was valid. In fact I propose that you restore it and AFD it. Then if it turns out that it is indeed bogus you can issue the author with a block rather than a mild rebuke. Rhomb (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough. Rhomb (talk) 22:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that. The disappointing but perhaps unsurprising result is that we now know that it's a hoax and I think that puts you in a position to go further with the author, who's clearly not here to build an encyclopaedia. Rhomb (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Rebecca Shaw

This may be a silly question, but if the fictional character appeared on General Hospital, why did you name the article "Rebecca Shaw (Another World)"? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 09:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

... duh. Let me fix that. DS (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

plucas

Sorry about the duplication of "Thomas Blount, 1st Baronet Blount" and "Thomas Pope Blount, 1st Baronet Blount" articles. Please delete the Thomas Pope Blount, 1st Baronet Blount article. I have deleted the content.

User:The_Person_Who_Is_Strange

Suggest you cast an editorial eye at this accounts edits. Looks like you crossed paths with them before, they seem to be continuing. Anniepoo (talk) 06:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Hans Frei

this article, which you deleted this morning, raises what i think to be an interesting question: is it copyright violation when the creator of the article is the owner of the copyright? as i pointed out in the discussion, the aricle was essentially verbatim (aside from my edits, i listed his death date, and deleted an excessively sentimental paragraph.) from a book on the subject by h.g. mathys, the subject's granddaughter. but h.g. mathys was the creator of the article. i think we can be quite sure that her intent was simply to tell her granddad's story in another venue, and that she would never come after wp for copyright infringement. the book, which was apparently self or vanity press published, may not even be copyrighted. bear in mind, my interest in the guy extends only to the fact that i own a piece of his work. now, while he was hardly a 20th century donatello, i think he is sufficiently notable to warrant inclusion here. it may be that her only failure was to include the licence statement.Toyokuni3 (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Article help

Hello, you commented on a previous article I wrote, and I now just finished my second article. Since you seem to be experienced with these matters, and I am not, I would love if you have a second if you might give me suggestions on how to improve it or enhance it. Thanks! It's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_B._Wilkins. Pensrulerstape (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

sorryy

for making the fake reality show pages ^^ But yeah omg I put all those animals up when I was like 11 -_- Or whenever I first joined Wikipedia lol Cruise meerkat (talk) 14:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I just have one question. Why did you delete my sandbox, and can I get it back? I spent a lot of effort making those charts and was planning on transferring them to a different site. :/ I know a sandbox is for experimenting or whatever, but I WAS experimenting with how to make them, and it was cruise meerkat/sandbox so it was messing up any page... :/ Cruise meerkat (talk) 23:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes that will be long enough! THANK YOU! I spent a lot of time making those charts! xD Cruise meerkat (talk) 00:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Grease (film)

Since one of the edit-warriors is autoconfirmed, I've upped this to full protection for the time being. Hope that's ok . Rodhullandemu 22:28, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Ludu (Userpage link)

DragonflySixtyseven, Why did you delete my page, hosted on my user space, working as practice in the wiki markup? Please get my page back. I was clearly editing only in my userspace and not screwing up any other part of wikipedia. Please don't go around deleting people's user spaces, as that is theirs to mess around with. Quintus314 (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'll save it as soon as it goes back up. Thanks for understanding, and thanks for the clarification! Quintus314 (talk) 03:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at ChildofMidnight's talk page.
Message added 01:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^Bongo_matic 01:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at ChildofMidnight's talk page.
Message added 02:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^Bongo_matic 02:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

I wanted to take another crack at making a Datacap page.

I wanted to take another crack at making a Datacap Page. I think I have a non sales oriented set of content that is fact driven and accurate. I can send it to you if you would like to see it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanofthecosmos (talk • contribs) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Evan, do you think you could post your draft at the following link: User:Evanofthecosmos/Datacap? Thanks. NW (Talk) 22:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

proving Divine

04:57, 31 January 2010 DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) deleted "User:SubtleCalmingFlow/proving Divine" ‎ (inappropriate use of userpage)

Hello, I am still a newbee on wikipeadia. I was wondering if you can tell me what was the inappropriate use of the userpage that provoke to you to delete the page instead of asking for it to be corrected. SubtleCalmingFlow (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:User page and Wikipedia:No original research; your material met our criteria for original research, and therefore had to be removed. Sorry. DS (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

That is probably a reasonable case for removal. I respect that. I will be happy to find another wiki or create my own to continue my pages... but would need my source text to do so. The Admins have access to this text and I don't.

Would it be possible that you email me the text or put a copy of it in my usertalk or somewhere I can access so that I can continue my work elsewhere? SubtleCalmingFlow (talk) 05:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 05:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks beautiful, thanks. May I also have the source for the User:SubtleCalmingFlow/Republic_of_Ecclesiastical_Dukes I would like to continue that elsewhere as well. SubtleCalmingFlow (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 18:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Lion FM - deleted page ?

I was writing a stub article on Lion FM (Melbourne Jewish Radio) in Melbourne Australia, with view of expanding it later.

You deleted this page based on Apparent Copyright Violation.

I am not sure whether any section was copyright by another writer, however if that was the case I will be carefull to quote references in future.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonanton2 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

My secret page

I just LOL'd big time when I saw what you put there. It doesn't matter anyway though. 4 T C 09:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Wavecal22/The Getting Real Work

Hi, Can i ask why you deleted my userpage, which was a work in progress? And can you define exactly why it was inappropriate for a user page... Seriously that was really uncool its not as if it was evena public page ready to go live. Do you have any idea how much work of mine you just erased?? User page was User:Wavecal22/The Getting Real Work, If there's any way you can restore it, maybe I won't be so mad, but honestly, what the hell? You can't just delete a userpage for no apparent reason!!!!!!!!!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wavecal22 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Looking at the deleted revision, that appears to be promotional and not necessarily notable. For what it is worth, User:Wavecal22/SusanMCampbell may not pass Wikipedia:Bio#Creative_professionals, and the image seems to be an outright copyvio. -- Avi (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I have offered to e-mail the deleted content to Wavecal22. I agree that SusanMCampbell may fail WP:Bio, but it might be a good idea to give Wavecal22 a chance to copy it off-line before proceeding with the deletion process. Rje (talk) 02:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

What Mortgage Page Deleted??

Dear DragonflySixtyseven,

I have noticed that the page i produced - What Mortgage has been deleted.

Not sure why, the magazine is genuine, helps consumers and has been published over 25 years.

Please can you advise why this was done, if there is anything that i need to do to it to make it more suitable.

Thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatmortgage (talk • contribs) 16:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Oik! what does this mean.

I have no idea what Autoreviewer means~!!!! Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Rokemronnie unblock on hold

This user was blocked by you several months back. After several failed unblock requests, it seems the user has at last arrived at some understanding of why they were blocked and have stopped being so fixated on your edit summary when blocking them. I was thinking of giving them a chance to prove it, but wanted to consult with you first as blocking admin. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

What Mortgage

Dear DragonflySixtyseven,

Thanks for your note - that the listing had been moved - silly me!!

All the best! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatmortgage (talk • contribs) 11:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Can an anon editor be a sock?

Hi, you blocked 86.129.16.26 (talk) - judging by his contributions, and edit summaries, this is possibly the same user as 81.147.163.126 (talk). Does this count as sockpuppetry? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, that's mostly an issue of semantics. It's clearly the same idiot (and he's already blocked). DS (talk) 16:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Evanofthcosmos/Datacap

I put this page up and I'm hoping to get any edits that it needs. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanofthecosmos (talk • contribs) 21:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: OurStage page that I want to upload

Hi Dragonfly! Just wanted to drop you a line and see the reasoning behind the deletion of the OurStage page. I definitely think they deserve to have a page on here for all the hard work they've done for young artists such as myself and would like to do anything I can to give back to them. If you do still think it should be deleted is there any way I could get the information I put on the site back? My computer crashed and I wasn't able to save everything I wrote on there and was very proud of how it was coming along. Hope to hear from you soon thanks much!

Have a great day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeytoes321 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

A barnstar for ya.

		The Purple Star
		For being one of those hit hard by 212.183.140.17. DaL33T (talk) 18:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Before blocking people think one million times because you blocked my friend Nunzia (User:Merynancy) this is my account (I'm Marianna) and that's hers so unblock her because you made a very big mistake you didn't read her user page she changed it now i use this account but she uses hers more!!!!!!! Is it possible to block people without knowing the truth?????? Be more careful next time you block somebody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Merythebest (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of my hidden page

Please explain the deletion of User:IBen/hidden.--iBen^talk/_contribs 18:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at IBen's talk page.
Message added 00:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

iBen^talk/_contribs 00:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

M-tech automotive page

Dragonfly, I see that Wiki says you deleted the M-tech talk page? Their article appears to be pure self promotion and is inaccurate in a number of ways. Is it not also in breach of NOR as they wrote it about themselves? 80.176.88.36 (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

The talk page was someone trying to ask M-tech for advice with their car parts. DS (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, but how about the page in general? Just looks like a big misleading advert to me. 80.176.88.36 (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Valentine's Day (film) has been protected for over a month

According to Special:Log/protect

17:08, 1 January 2010 DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) protected Valentine's Day (film) (expires 00:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC))

It was pretty harsh to lock it down for over a month. How's about unprotecting it today, to give IP's like me time before the film opens to post some ref'ed quotes from reviews...Thanks. 72.244.201.12 (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Warning without 1 revert

Hallo, I've added just a link about a personality in Gjirokastër, that's all not any rv so far. I'm writing this because of the warning i've just received which I dont understand why it was posted.

Sulmues' edit was constructive this time [[1]]. There is no edit war as far I see there. Hope Sulmues' highly nationalistic edit summaries [[2]] aren't enough to initiate a battleground.Alexikoua (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at IBen's talk page.
Message added 00:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

iBen^talk/_contribs 00:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at IBen's talk page.
Message added 00:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

iBen^talk/_contribs 00:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

You moved my draft??

Is there a reason you moved a draft article from my userspace to mainspace that is so glaringly incomplete? There are things in there that aren't even complete sentences. I would appreciate it if you would allow me to move articles when I feel there are of sufficient quality for mainspace. Jim Miller ^{See me | Touch me} 02:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the move back. I will get to it, but have been dealing with a FLC and making a lot of corrections to others articles related to that list. Need to find some actual paper books to get that article ready to move. Jim Miller ^{See me | Touch me} 02:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Mindful Eating Article

I'm the original author of the Mindful Eating article. I see that it was deleted without discussion for the reason that "(cited sources do not support article)" Can you be more specific? Or point out some areas that you feel require further sources. This field is growing very quickly and there are a great many additional sources I can cite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rturtle (talk • contribs) 13:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

(dealt with on user talk:Rturtle) DS (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

"Best of the Best Vol 1. Deletion

Hi, I noticed that the article for the W.A.S.P. compilation album "The Best of the Best, 1984-2000, Vol. 1" was deleted by you back in August of 2008. The original url was at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Best_of_the_Best:_1984-2000,_Vol._1&action=edit&redlink=1

I was wondering why specifically it was deleted (not notable, not verifiable, whatever). I couldn't find any discussion of it in your archived talk pages, so I'm not sure if this has already come up before. Since I'm not able to view the original page I'm not sure what needed to be changed in order to make it worth keeping (assuming that it was, which is why I'm asking. Maybe it just isn't worth having an article on that album?) If you can remember what the issue was with this page, I'd be happy to look into and address whatever was wrong with it. Dexeron (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I deleted it because it was just a tracklist. There was no content. It didn`t say anything about who it was by or anything like that. Feel free to make a new version. DS (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

User Pages in Main Space

you noted that my user pages are in the main space, and I would like to fix this but don't know how; ever since I started working with subpages I have had this problem please tell me what to do--Busaccsb (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Page Recently Deleted in Main Space

I was wondering why my Matrix Martial Arts article got deleted. What do I need to fix?--Havok2009 (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I've restored it for you. DF67 seemed to feel the article wasn't an encyclopedic article, but an magazine article; But whatever that doesn't allow for speedy deletion. But the article might end up at WP:AFD in the near future if people think it doesn't fit here. _→AzaToth 18:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

moon riogs

why did you got rid of it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.175.247.51 (talk) 12:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

No idea what you're talking about. DS (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

I have removed the previous post from this page per DFTT

It is still in the history, of course. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Mindful Eating

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mindful Eating. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Rturtle (talk) 05:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)rturtle

Talk:Northwest Territorial Mint

Hi, you deleted Talk:Northwest Territorial Mint on 16 August 2009 with the rationale "dealt with." Could you please elaborate on what was meant by that? I'm trying to deal with some BLP issues on the article and want to make sure there was no previous discussion on it in the past. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Template talk:MC Hammer

You deleted Template talk:MC Hammer with the deletion reason of "not a forum". A) this is not a valid reason under the speedy deletion criteria. b) the template is a navigation template listing various articles about performances by MC Hammer. Therefore a mention of a specific performance could be an attempt (albeit poorly formatted) to fill in allegedly missing information, and thus an appropriate use of a talk page. DES ^(talk) 15:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

A) Damn well is. B) Point taken; I'll restore it. DS (talk) 15:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

a) Which specific one of the WP:CSD does "Not a forum" translate to, please? I can't see it as fitting any of them. Perhaps i am overlooking something. It would, of course, often be a valid reason at WP:MFD. b) Thank you. DES ^(talk) 16:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Studio 1 Photographhttp://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_sig.pngy

You deleted Studio 1 Photography with a log reason of "notability not asserted" which i assume translates to WP:CSD#A7. however it seems to me that "...was featured as Utah's best wedding photographer on a budget." constitutes a claim of significance, even if it does not go all the way to establishing notability, making an A7 speedy incorrect. DES ^(talk) 16:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Reply on categorization

Peace on who follows the truth. Thanks alot for your kind note. حسن علي البط 14:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Andre39/sandbox

...I've been watching that trainwreck-in-waiting. I poked him enough to try and fix it ... thanks for deleting, as I've been thinking of doing it myself, but thought it might be tough to both AGF and delete :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I am Andre39 - I didn't understand your directions for fixing it - all pictures were ours to use, and whether or not it is an appropriate use of a page, I still do not understand what was wrong with it. I still have the code - what can I do to fix it? I went to alot of work to put it up, and the only reason I have not logged on is I have been suffering with a sreious staph infection for the last 4 weeks. Can you please help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andre39 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Already asked you about this once

My watchlist log contains the following entry for Feb 11: (diff) (hist) . . User:Busaccsb/indepence‎; 04:57 . . (-383) . . DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) (userpages don't go in mainspace categories). So you edited one of my user space pages, and left that note. I don't want to have my user pages available for editing, or to turn up on searches. I thought putting at top of the page would do this, but it doesn't. Please help me out and tell me what I should do.--Busaccsb (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC) ...Thanks for your help--Busaccsb (talk) 02:48, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

Thank you for this -- I understand that it isn't really to help me, but rather to reduce the load on page patrollers -- but, still, it's nice to be noticed. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 13:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC

HELP REGARDING THE DELETION OF BCJ200 AND GOODY BURRETT LLP

Dear Dragonfly,

I am having trouble, accessing or editing Goody Burrett LLP page in any way in order to make the necessary changes so that the page conforms to Wikipedia standards. Please advise as to how I may go about this. I am a new Wikipedia user.

Many Thanks

BCJ200

Jazwares Page Deleted

I understand that you deleted my Jazwares page on February 6th. I was wondering why it was deleted and how I can get it back up and running again. My username is Lgresham. All of the information on my page was factual and I do not understand any reason for deletion. Please let me know. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgresham (talk • contribs) 15:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Mornin' From Cape Breton-on January 6th, 2010 you erased my user page on www.cbchoices.com?? could you kindly explain why, i was trying to create an information page for Wikipedia-which seems to have not heard of my 11 years of work on cape breton island music. Thanks. I never even received a notice it was even erased?Cbchoices (talk) 12:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

(both answered on their own talkpages)

Parent article

I screwed up. I'm sorry. I meant to use the template that warns people who worked on a page that I'd put it up for speedy delete. Please find the nearest trout and slap me. David in DC (talk) 12:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

A180 DARTS Deleted

help us to know why we was deleted please Dragonfly

HI A180 darts here, we try our best to be 100% Honest and spend many £1000s looking after Dart players, I am quite new on here and have valuble up to date information, But found our page deleted, Can you let us Know how to get it back on and Why it was taken off, We are a180 Darts. Thanks Karl , Manager A180 darts —Preceding unsigned comment added by A180darts (talk • contribs) 12:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Monarchs of Edem

Hi, I want to publish an article but I understand you deleted it earlier. This is the link to the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:List_of_Monarchs_of_Edem_(Eze_Edem). I recently published an article on Edem and would like to do some on the monarchs. Kindly let me know what has to be done to get the article published. Thanks. (Eidaofedem (talk) 01:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eidaofedem (talk • contribs)

Userspace deletions

Hello. You have previously deleted some of my userspace redirects left from when I moved articles to the mainspace. Could you also please delete the following redirects?

• User:Brambleclawx/List of RiverClan cats (Warriors)
• User:Brambleclawx/List of SkyClan cats (Warriors)
• User:Brambleclawx/List of Characters outside Clans (Warriors)
• User:Brambleclawx/List of cats in the Tribe of Rushing Water and Ancient cats (Warriors)
• User:Brambleclawx/List of ShadowClan cats (Warriors)

Thank you. Brambleclawx 18:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Charles B. Moore Article

Hello,

Thank you for updating the Charles B. Moore Article. I was so focused on correcting the Date of Birth that I completely missed the fact that the Reference I found was an Obituary! Time for a break :-) Thanks, again. -- Michael David (talk) 00:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Ervis Agolli

Could you delete this [3]. The middle name added is an insult in Albanian not his real middle name.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 12:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Secondary account

Thank you for the note in my talk page. I'm sulmues and I would like to use this name from now on. Unfortunately I put my wikibreak enforcer that I applied in the Sulmues page until december (too much), and I can't log in with that anymore. I'd like to be allowed to edit with Gollomboc until then. --Gollomboc (talk) 23:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I gotta delete Gollomboc: user:Ronhjones deleted my monobook.js and I could log back in. --sulmues (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Studio 1 Photography

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Studio 1 Photography. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DES ^(talk) 17:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

• I went ahead and just restored this article so we can get on with the AFD. Cheers, –xeno^talk 19:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you but

Thank you for your interest in my list, but could you restore the links you removed? The list is intended to list to both missing and existing articles. Thanks, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 00:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Request for help

Hello, could you have a look at the article on Alice de Janzé I began four years ago and have been improving on a day by day basis? I hope I can turn it into a Good Article in the near future. Am I close? Any suggestions? Xanthi22 (talk) 12:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

deletion of User:Doxiedana

You deleted User:Doxiedana with the log entry "Silliness". The page was indeed silly, but that is emphatically not a valid speedy deletion reason, and other far sillier user pages have been kept by MfD. Please restore this page promptly. DES ^(talk) 14:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Versicolorin reductase

You deleted Versicolorin reductase with the log entry "not an article". The content looks to have been a description of a particular enzyme in a rather outline form. It would need significant work to be a decent article, and it is possible that an AfD would delete it as non-notable. But The information might well be used to create a reasonable article, and WP:PRESERVE should apply here. In any case, "not an article" is in no way a speedy deletion criterion. Please restore this article promptly. DES ^(talk) 14:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
Message added 14:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DES ^(talk) 14:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Further responses posted. DES ^(talk) 16:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for User:Doxiedana

I have asked for a deletion review of User:Doxiedana. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DES ^(talk) 18:56, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Ska vegas

You deleted Ska vegaswith a deletion log reason of "unverifiable". It had been proded earlier the same daym if I am reading the historty correctly. However, a Google news search finds 50 hits on (Ska vegas) including [4], [5], and [6]. In any case "unverifiable" is not a speedy deletion reason. Please restore this page and allow the prod to continue or take it to AfD. DES ^(talk) 20:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk page redirects

I notice that in several cases you deleted talk page redirects (in cases where a page and its talk page had been moved or merged, mostly) as "unnecessary redirect". While it is true that such redirs are not strictly needed, according to WP:Redirect and WT:Redirect the cost of updating the page tables and watch lists due to the deletion is higher than the cost of leaving the redirect in place, and such redirs surely do no harm. I don't suggest restoring any such you have deleted, but I do suggest considering not deleting any such redirs in future. DES ^(talk) 20:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
Message added 21:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

thank you DES ^(talk) 21:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Frank T Bullen

Hi! I am very suspicious of the following in the Frank T Bullen entry: "where he infamously worked for Dr. Eric G. Roberts where he learned about heart surgery" It is the sole contribution by 147.126.150.155 added on 15 December 2008. I suspect that it aims to slur a living person and suggest we delete it. Cheers Gpeterw (talk) 13:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Done. DS (talk) 13:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi i just found out a while ago you deleted my talk.I am sorry but i didn't know what to do i was a newbie and i couldn't read the rules because my computer won't let me . . . . .so leave me a message so i can get my information and get what i need--Emmarose26 (talk) 21:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

TB

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at Tommy2010's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your input is requested

As you have recently edited Andy Martin (American politician), I am writing to request your input at the article talk page, sections Vexed and disputed are the ones which outline the current issue. Many thanks in advance for your time. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 21:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Explanation needed

I wonder why you were aggressive here [[7]], by claiming that you found quotes that are non existent in these books. You find it right to threaten users to block them for 2 weeks just by misusing arguments?Alexikoua (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

That's odd; I remember those URLs linking to the quotes in question. Still, though, such talkpages are already a battleground. DS (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Why U Delete Secret Page?

Why don't users have the right to have a page to their own? Creator11's RQI was likely violating something, but what was wrong with it? Creator11 wasn't hurting anybody! I stick up for that user. Just give me a complete reason for its deletion. And edit summaries like that one are sardonically acidic. Save some data, Creator11 didn't know any better. 2D Backfire Master ^{¿Por que,señor?} 03:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not Myspace. Honestly, we do not care if it is not "hurting anybody". If it's not relevant to Wikipedia, it has to go. And secret pages are not relevant. —Dark 03:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

More for you:

• User:Hi878/Secret_Hidden_Page
• User:Hi878/Somewhat_Hidden_Page/Actual_Secret_Page
• User:Hi878/Right_Secret_Page
• User:Hi878/Hidden_Secret_Page
• User:Hi878/Somewhat_Hidden_Page and
• User:Hi878/Wrong_Secret_Page! Cheers, mono 18:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC).

I love DragonFlys!!! Why did my page get deleted?

Why?

Why did you delete Hi878's secret pages? He didn't request deletion. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 19:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at NerdyScienceDude's talk page.
Message added 19:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 19:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

User:IBen/TB mono 20:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at NerdyScienceDude's talk page.
Message added 22:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 22:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm done subst'ing. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 23:47, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Your out-of-process deletions

Your recent deletions appear to be directly counter to the explicit wording of consensus based policy written at WP:CSD.

The criteria for speedy deletion specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussion and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media. They cover only the cases specified in the rules below.

Would you please stop, or explicitly cite the CSD criteria you use. Such bursts of out-of-process deletions is bad for the project because it undermines the role of WP:MFD, and hurts the confidence of the ordinary editor that this project is community governed. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

FYI, I started a discussion about secret pages at User talk:MZMcBride#Secret pages at WP:MFD. Cunard (talk) 19:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Reply of My Page has been deleted

Hello sir, Please check these links which I will update in my page for reference. 1. http://www.sooperarticles.com/art-entertainment-articles/review-about-mybaraka-43751.html 2. http://serversiders.com/mybaraka.com 3. http://www.sitelogr.com/s/mybaraka.com 4. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/mybaraka.com 5. http://www.folkd.com/user/aneeqaiqbal 6. http://mybaraka.wordpress.com/ 7. http://www.salernoblog.com/2010/02/19/review-about-mybaraka.html/ User talk: Rukju2001 23:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rukju2001 (talk • contribs)

see you on the 21st

) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.82.28.76 (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Deleted subpages

Huh... can you just put back the pages you deleted under User:Mr. Frank/band and others (for this account) so I can save the work on my computer? Mr. Frank (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

The list is done, ckeck it out. Mr. Frank (talk) 22:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

OK, you can delete. Thanks a lot. Mr. Frank (talk) 23:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at NerdyScienceDude's talk page.
Message added 02:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 02:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Question

How you doing? Someone came to my talk page and stated that you deleted "Talk:Federal government of Mexico". Now, I am curious. Why would you delete a talk page that had no content? Tony the Marine (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

• Don't get me wrong, I really do not care to much about that page, just that User: Mercy was asking ([8]), because a simple revert of the page, as Mercy did would have been just as good. Anyway, thank you for your response. Take care, Tony the Marine (talk) 03:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting my unprofessional attempt at French

on my userpage. Hope you enjoyed it! ALI ^{nom nom} 18:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

What

what is the problem??? Shanticm (talk) 07:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

• Incidentally, i do not care of your sanctions because i have life beyong Wikipedia... Shanticm (talk) 08:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Bvrly

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at Smerus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at Smerus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deletion of Talk:Imagines

You deleted Talk:Imagines with a deletion reason of "wrong language". It is true that talk page discussion is normally in English. This might be a reason to request the poster to translate the comment, but it is not a reason to delte the page. It does not correspond top any of the WP:CSD, and this deletion was therefore out of process. it is also unhelpful, and probably WP:BIIEy, given that this is an IP user who appears to be new. Please restore this page. DES ^(talk) 14:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

I looked at it more carefully, I went through various translators... it's pretty much a love note to the contributor's girlfriend, placed on Wikipedia just because. In other words: no, I will not. DS (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Had you chosen to indicate the actual reason for deletion in the log (something like "attempt to communicate", since you seem to dislike the actual CSD reasons), this exchange would probably not have occurred. Log entries matter. And checking the deletions of an admin who appears very willing to delete whatever the admin chooses, without reference to the CSD or to anyone else, seems quite worth while to me. Many, indeed most, of your deletions are IMO well-judged, but a significant number are not. You also routinely delete without notifying the page creators, which is more than a bit WP:BITEy IMO, and also fails to educate editors who are often in need of guidance, and goes against the wide consensus that such notification is highly desirable, although not mandatory. Also, your comment above suggests that when you deleted this, you had not translated it and knew only that it was not in English, which is not a good reason for deleting it. An expanded version of the response on my talk page. DES ^(talk) 16:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Talk:Tres Personajes

You deleted Talk:Tres Personajes with a logged reason of "test page". The actual text was

Este es ridiculoso.

No puedo encontrar nada importante sobre la obra por el internet porque cada sitio de web, en espanol o ingles, tiene el cuento de la obra deseperacido.

Tengo que saber sobre los simbolos y el uso de colores y no hay nada provechoso.

according to Google translate this is Spanish for:

This is ridiculous.

I can not find anything important in the work over the Internet because every website, in Spanish or English, is the story of the work deseperacido.

I have to know about the symbols and the use of colors and there is nothing helpful.

This seems to be a suggestion that the article on the painting include more about the painting itself, whereas it currently focuses entirely on the theft of the painting.

Please consider restoring this page. DES ^(talk) 17:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

No. That's a homework question (and, admittedly, 'test page' was not the correct reason). If it had suggested changes to the article, I would restore it, but it is phrased such that it is evident the user wants us to do his homework for him. I will not restore the page. DS (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Talk:Tres Personajes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Talk:Tres Personajes. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DES ^(talk) 00:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Talk:Danda nata

You deleted Talk:Danda nata with the logged reason of "homework". The actual content was "How do we know authencity of an event if it is belonged to ancient period?" which is a not unreasonable question about an unreferenced article which may be discussing a historical event. Please restore. DES ^(talk)

I read the article. It said nothing about ancient events of any kind. I concluded that it was a general homework-type question. No. DS (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Very well, I will raise the matter on WP:DRV. DES ^(talk) 17:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Laura Haskins-Bookser (author)

I am wondering why you deleted the page Laura Haskins-Bookser? If an author is published (not self-published) why would the page be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msleh100 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Peresadyes

Since you participated in this article is it possible to have your opinion on the topic? Talk:Peresadyes Thank you.Alexikoua (talk) 19:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

How I could

Looks like my opinion is doubly justified.--Cube lurker (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk page and email blocks

Hi DragonflySixtyseven. I've unblocked Lianavdelningen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who you blocked in January as a spammer. They appealed to unblock-en-l and I'm pretty certain that they're not a spammer. They just didn't realise that posting their own website links to their userpage was problematic and would be taken as spamming and they've assured me it won't happen again. They said they've been using Wikipedia regularly for reading for a long time but they only discovered their account was blocked a few days ago when they found an error in an article and signed into their account with the intention of fixing the article. I told them I didn't think the block was unreasonable given their only edit was to post external links to their userpage. However, I noticed that you also blocked their ability to use email and to edit their own talk page and I don't understand why. I think those settings are only meant to be used carefully in cases involving people likely to abuse access to their talk page or the email facility and I can't see any reason to believe that person would have abused communication tools. So I was just wondering why you blocked their talk page and email? Thanks. Sarah 01:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Spammers would be likely to abuse talkpage and e-mail, is why. However, in retrospect I seem to have been thinking of someone else. That wasn't what I categorize as 'spam'; I'll have to apologize. DS (talk) 02:01, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southport_Promenade_Hospital

Hi, could you correct the caption to the map on this page on the old Southport Hospital -- or find someone who can do it? I'm not competent. Many thanks, and all the best, Peter Gpeterw (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

ANI regarding your recent deletion spree

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Recent_deletions_by_User:DragonflySixtyseven Gigs (talk) 22:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

When I click on the link it come's up saying Vevo have blocked this video from ur country and NowYoucanseeme who made the page as allowed it to go up (talk

The Video under the bands official video has been put down from my country —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrFYE (talk • contribs) 23:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For restoring or recreating the pages up for DRVs. I suspect I haven't convinced you of my general point, but i hope you will consider it. DES ^(talk) 02:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyvio deletion log entries

When you delete a page as a copyvio, it would be helpful to note the URL or source in the log entry. this makes things easier for a patroller if the page is recreated later -- it points to a place to check. It also helps if the user complains to another editor. DES ^(talk) 02:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Jsebdavis

When you get a chance, can you please provide some more background on your block of User talk:Jsebdavis? The reason "impersonating Jsebdavis" seems overly zen; did you mean to put another username in there? Kuru (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

BTRA

Thanks for helping in the merge procedure.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 15:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Need to move a new page

I'd like to move the page User:ChemE50/Joseph J. Jacobs (Engineer) to the main area. Please review it to see if you agree it is ready. Thanks.ChemE50 (talk) 02:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for moving the Jacobs page. Now I'd like to delete the page User:ChemE50:William H. Walker. How can I do this? I've already transferred the content to a previously-existing stub.ChemE50 (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

About my subpages

You can delete the ones that are not linked to on my userpage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rin tin tin (talk • contribs) 20:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Question re deleted article on the "Two-factor model"

I found a reference to an article titled "Two-factor model" in the "desired articles" list of the Business and Economics Project, and I see that you deleted it 02:13, 9 May 2009, with the parenthetical comment "crap." If the latter is an assessment of the entry's quality, I'm strongly inclined not to doubt it! Nevertheless, I'd like to see what was there, in the hope it would provide some idea of the original intention of whoever originally suggested the topic. (The topic itself is a legitimate and potentially important one, depending on its original intent.)

If you could somehow "uncrap" it so I could take a look at it, I'd greatly appreciate it. Absolutely nothing urgent, though! Thanks. --Jackftwist (talk) 22:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for the quick response. No, I don't think I need to see it. Your assessment ("crap") sounds far too generous! Too bad -- as I said, it's a potentially important topic for this project. Thx again. --Jackftwist (talk) 23:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Jenni Muldaur deletion

I know it's been a while, but can you recall (or look up) why the Jenni Muldaur page that you deleted on 15 December 2007 constituted a copyright violation? While I can easily imagine photographs or song lyrics that would comprise copyright violations on a singer's biographical page, I'm curious to know why the page was deleted entirely and not merely trimmed of the offending material. Thanks, PaulNovitski (talk) 07:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

This just in: Insecticide kills bugs!

Thanks for correcting my user page. I had momentarily forgotten that the mosquitoes whose 'bite' transmits malaria and which thereby kill millions of poor people of color annually are "wildlife". --Uncle Ed (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I apologize for the remarks above, which I have struck out. I wish I hadn't tried to make joke like that. Please forgive me. :-( --Uncle Ed (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Terminology

Hi DF! I've answered here [[9]].Alexikoua (talk) 20:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you for your kind words on plumbogummite. I am addicted to these minerals! Strickja (talk) 05:09, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey Thanks for making me feel welcome on Wikipedia. Even though I am a fairly new member, I hope that I will be able to help in contributing to articles, thus making wikipedia a great place. Thanks again. GreenNintendo (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Belated but most sincere thank you for autoreviewer rights grant

Hi DF67!
Very late but very sincere thank you for granting me autoreviewer rights. Quite frankly I'm as proud of this as of my off-wiki achievements. Yep, I really do think so.
As they are apparently an endangered species, I can't offer you the Southern Marsupial Mole-shaped Barnstar. I'm sure your fellow admin Moonriddengirl will be more than happy to share hers with you.
I really appreciate the trust you as an admin have have shown in me; what's more, I would ask that you immediately remove the autoreviewer status if I deviate from that trust in any way whatsoever.
Thanks again! - --Shirt58 (talk) 12:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

NH?

Would you mind giving me a one-liner summary of the reason behind that block (or point me at the right context)? The summary of the block itself is rather opaque to me. — Coren ^(talk) 15:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

I left you a message on NH's talk page, requesting further clarifications (i.e., diffs). Thanks! Tan | 39 16:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

I have no opinion on the propriety of the block itself (I didn't look into the matter), but I'd ask you to be a little more careful with block summaries: they are, for all practical purposes, permanent and immutable and it's better to avoid being obscure in them because of it. I know how hard it is to avoid being snarky sometimes when faced with a recalcitrant repeat offender, but a few factual words are infinitely better than a witty retort even if, at the time it was made, it's clear to everyone involved. — Coren ^(talk) 18:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

...and can I ask if you would consider a shorter time (based on an appropriate unblock request this time) - 70hrs for this seems like punishment, not preventative ... at least IMHO. I do, however, concede that I might be a minority. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Cheers (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Draganparis

From my talk-page: "Do you think I can not do the same? Explain how stupid you are, for example? This will not need much of imagination to show." That's what I have to deal with here and admins are warning me for my attempts at poignant humour. Go take a look at his talk-page. Conspiracy theories, trolling, lies and distortions. Not to mention a personal attack page on several editors. Simanos (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

BTW, since you asked, I'm in constant adrenaline overdose (rush) because someone gave me a poison that will stop my heart if I don't pump my blood full of adrenaline constantly. Thank you for understanding... now get your boxing gloves on fast! Simanos (talk) 19:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

User:JamAKiska/Griffith Hughes (naturalist) request for review.

Hope all is well with you. I have had a chance to get back into this project and bring it near completion. Was hoping you could find time to review prior to movement to mainspace. Thanks for your help with this. CUoD (talk) 15:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at Tadija's talk page.
Message added 17:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tadija^speaks 17:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

I know you're kidding

...but this was in very poor taste. Yes, I realize that it's clever, and funny, and delightfully ironic, and just a taste of his own medicine, and so forth — but please don't do that sort of thing again. He's already obviously on tilt, and your comment isn't going to help that. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Reviving an old template

Dragonfly6-7: I'm thinking about trying to reupload a template viewable at Template:X7 (Originally Template:Information needed). But it was previous deleted per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_October_25&oldid=248013842 two months after not reaching a consensus.

I feel as if the discussion never reached a consensus and I'm wondering if now would be the right time to bring this Template back up, and the process by with to do it so that it does not get deleted again. Spitfire19 (Talk) 00:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Klechkowski

Re: Your question in pl:Wiki (pl:User talk:Polimerek#Klechkowski)

Hello, it seems that the proper transcription of his name is "Klechkovskii". V.M. Klechkovskii was a Russian agrochemist who published his rule in 1952 (in Russian). There is an article on Klechkovskii in Russian Wiki: ru:Клечковский, Всеволод Маврикиевич.

ISI Web of Science has several records on his contributions, starting with:

Title: O POSLEDOVATELNOSTI V ZAPOLNENII ELEKTRONNYKH UROVNEI ATOMOV

Author(s): KLECHKOVSKII VM

Source: ZHURNAL EKSPERIMENTALNOI I TEORETICHESKOI FIZIKI Volume: 23 Issue: 1 Pages: 115-122 Published: 1952

Title: K FORMULIROVKE PRAVIL ZAPOLNENIYA ELEKTRONNYKH UROVNEI

Author(s): KLECHKOVSKII VM

Source: DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR Volume: 92 Issue: 5 Pages: 923-926 Published: 1953

Regards, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

User:WhatGuy

I noticed you left this message at User:WhatGuy's talk page a while back. Just thought you'd like to know, he has recreated some thirty-seven subpages since you deleted them back in January. See Special:PrefixIndex/User:WhatGuy. Thanks, 青い(Aoi) (talk) 10:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Herbey

Dragonfly, anyway I can retrieve copy of my article that was deleted? Not to repost, but for my own purposes of posting to some other wiki's on the net. Please advise...

Realdania

I noticed that you deleted the page Realdania.  There's a link to it from List_of_wealthiest_foundations that may also need to be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.148.68 (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 

USER:HERBEY=

Dragonfly..Thank you for allowing me to recover a copy of my article. Greatly appreciated. Thanks....  :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.127.118.140 (talk) 06:41, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Secret pages

More for you:

• User:Hi878/Secret_Hidden_Page
• User:Hi878/Secret_Page_List
• User:Hi878/Hidden Secret Page
• User:Hi878/Somewhat Hidden Page
• User:Hi878/Right Secret Page
• User:Hi878/Wrong Secret Page

You can look for more.--mayo 00:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Mono, please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hi878/Secret Page List as well as User talk:NerdyScienceDude/Archive 5#Secret pages. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 00:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

USER:DESELMS

To: DragonflySixtyseven

RE: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._Augustine's_House

I'm not the person who originally wrote the St. Augustine's House article, nor have I ever contributed to it. So I have no ax to grind, here, or anything like that. I'm not upset about anything, or trying to hold anyone accountable. It's nothing like that.

I'm simply wondering, if I may, why the article was deleted. I don't, frankly, remember the article, to be candid; though I'm certain I must have visited it and read it in the past because I know much of the monastery (and, I promise you, I do not have any formal affiliation with it whatsoever). I don't know if the article was just a stub and someone decided it wasn't important or something, or if it was fully developed but violated some kind of rule, or what. Again, I'm not trying to question anyone's wisdom.

May I please know, though, why it was deleted? I mean... you know... in a little bit of detail? To save you the trouble (because I know you're busy), is there a discussion log or something someplace where I might read what happened? Is there a copy of the article somewhere that I can see? Maybe it could be put into my sandbox or something so I can see it. Would that be possible?

If it turns out that there has been a misunderstanding; or if whatever was wrong with it is something that could be fixed, might it be possible for a new article to be written which will be acceptable? The monastery, for whatever it's worth, is real. It has the support of all the mainstream denominationally-Lutheran church bodies in the US; is "good friends" with the Benedictine (Catholic) monastery just down the road; and has affiliate Lutheran monasteries in Europe which are also supported by their respective countries' mainline denominationally-Lutheran church bodies.

Granted, the monastery is tiny (though not so much in terms of the size of the property... that part of it is actually quite large); but so are many well-regarded and honest-to-goodness monasteries in the world. Believe me, though, it's well-known throughout the world.

And St. Augustine's House is unique in that it's decidedly Benedictine in both the way it's run, and in its strict observance of the Liturgy of the Hours; yet, curiously, that very thing flies in the face of what Martin Luther believed about monastacism and holy orders (he considered them unnecessary... even wrong). That that has been reconciled to the satisfaction of Lutherans and Catholics alike is part of what makes it remarkable.

Also, just to be clear: St. Augustine's House is not part of any breakaway denominational movement, like all the wacky Independent or so-called "Old" Catholic churches out there... so many of which have Wikipedia articles, yet many of them exist, quite literally, in their "bishop"'s basements or living rooms. St. Augustine's House is the real deal... a huge campus with beautiful buildings on it that were built for the monastery.... a chapel, a residential house, the abbot's cottage, a retreat hut in the woods, marked and maintained trails... and now a beautiful new library building that's truly impressive.

Again, St. Augustine's is the real deal. It's been around for many, many years. And its abbot isn't just some wacky guy who woke-up one day and started calling himself a pastor. In keeping with the Lutheran tradition of valuing education, generally; and also insisting that it's clergy are very well educated, this man has a Master of Divinity (MDiv) degree from a seminary accredited by an agency approed by the US Department of Education (USDE) and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). And he's properly ordained by one of the mainstream Lutheran bodies. His is, in other words, a denominationally-approved ministry... very official... the real deal. When so many other Wikipedia articles are about tiny church bodies that simply sprang-up one day in the mind of some disaffected, disgruntled or excommunicated Catholic (or defrocked clergy), it just doesn't seem possible to me that anyone here would consider St. Augustine's House any less noteworthy or less deserving of its own article.

Furthermore, St. Augustine's House's now-deleted article is linked-to from other articles here... so now there are broken (red) links in those articles.

Again, I'm not affiliated with St. Augustine's House. However, I've long been interested in it, and have been something of a fan. After spending the summer of 2007 in Indiana settling my mom's estate, and fixing-up her house for sale, I drove four hours up to the monastery near Detroit and spent a few days there... mostly fumbling embarrassingly through the multiple-times-daily liturgies, and generally getting a feel for the place, out of curiosity more than anything else, before finally getting back in the car and heading back to California. So I'm an eye-witness to the place's both existence and credibility.

Again, it's the real deal... worthy of an article here.

So, is there some way that I can come to understand what happened, and how whatever was wrong could be remediated, so that perhaps a new article could be written? I'm willing to do the work, and to take responsibility; and to ensure that Wikipedia's rules are observed.

Thanks, in advance, for your understanding and help. I look forward to reading your response.

Gregg L. DesElms 07:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

USER:DESELMS

Thank you, DragonflySixtyseven, for explaining, on my talk page, what happened regarding this St. Augustine's House article. I appreciate it very much. And I understand, now, completely, why you deleted it. Makes good sense. I also appreciate that you're open to a new article... only this time one that isn't verbatim from a copyrighted work; and this time one that's actually a properly Wikified article. I'll get on it in the not-too-distant future and see what I can do with it. Your commentary and guidance, if you should happen to notice it once it's posted, would be valued and appreciated.

Again, thank you... and keep up the good work.

Gregg L. DesElms (Username: Deselms) 16:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deselms (talk • contribs)

Thanks for granting me Autoreviewer rights

Thank you for granting me autoreviewer rights, DragonflySixtyseven. Your vote of confidence in my abilities provides me with a modicum of reassurance that my efforts to date are actually helping to improve the Wikipedia project. Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance to you in some way. DiverDave (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

REMOVING OF MY POEM

hi! dear ds, nice introduction on wikipedia, i donot know about licenses and copyright policy, but i am ready to release my poem on wikipedia, please put my poem back on my user page, thank you--Luky (talk) 15:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

thank you for restoring my poem, i hope we will have some nice time on wikipedia in future to help eachother,cheers--Luky (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi DS. Luky's poem is the lyrics of "Aerials" by System of a Down. As such, Luky is unfortunately not in a position to release it under a free license (at least not without a very convincing OTRS ticket). I have therefore re-deleted it as a copyvio. Regards, decltype (talk) 18:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Mass page deletion

Can I ask for what reason you deleted all of the pages introduced by User:Tiamy-adastra since there was no reason given in your edit summary? VernoWhitney (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyvio and spam. If you want more details, ask user:Bapti. DS (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Your explanation was fine, I just don't usually see that many pages that I've blanked as permission-asserted copyvios show up as deleted on my watchlist all at once so I was curious if there was more to it than that. Thanks. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Occam

Ahem, first of all you have incorrectly described what I wrote. On WP users other than me have discussed the precise off-wiki post, which I made no link to (Occam gave the account himself). Secondly, according to an email Maunus sent me, he redacted my post at least twelve hour before you wrote your message.[10] Were you aware of this? Mathsci (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Lyrics

Well, when I originally joined Wikipedia 3 years ago I was pretty clueless as to what was right or wrong or what was generally accepted. I decided to keep it after all these years even though as you have said of it not being the best place for it. It was only temporary after I found a site to compile it. I still want to create a site that will have all my lyrics and everything else that was on my page but never found anything to my liking that served me well. So please do e-mail it to me. Thanks! −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ ^kaiden 23:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Disruption by User:Stupidus Maximus

Notwithstanding the fact that this individual is almost certainly a sock of the banned User:Guildenrich [11], he is extremely disruptive.

Example #1: Yesterday, he blanket rved [12] a number of perfectly harmless cpedits of mine [13] without so much as an explanation. He only relented after I threatened to go nuclear [14] [15] disingenuously claiming to have made a mistake (and after mocking me to fix it myself [16]). He then continued trolling my talkpage [17]. I do not for a second believe it was a mistake: He has never edited that article before, he evidently went through my contribs and saw a perfect opportunity to spite me.

Example #2: A few days ago, he rammed through some changes to Lunxhëri without bothering to consult anyone, and today he apparently went off the deep end with this [18]. I mean, look at that. He basically took the old version of the article and pasted it there.

Example #3: Today, he was trolling User:Alexikoua's talkpage. Take a look at these exchanges: [19] [20] regarding this dispute: [21] [22] [23]. Apparently, it's perfectly ok for him to add a bunch of Albanian nobodies, but god forbid anyone add any notable Greeks: In that case, it is necessary for them to be found on Google Books [24], but for "his" notable people a raw google search turning up nonsense is more than sufficient [25]. It's impossible to get a word through with the guy. Any attempt at engaging him is met with trolling and mockery: [26] [27]. This exchange here [28] is also illuminating. He never answers a question posed to him. He just throws around cryptic non-answers and deliberately plays juvenile mind-games with anyone who tries to reason with him. And just in case you think I'm just saying that because I'm Greek, well, it's not just Greek users who seem to find him disruptive [29].

I note you have a history of intervening on behalf of Albanian users, doubtless because ZjarriRrethues chats with you a lot on IRC. Don't believe everything he tells you. He too is almost certainly a sock of a previously banned user (SPI to come, I have a mountain of evidence, and again, it's not just me who seems to think he is a sock [30]). The Greek users are all under editing restrictions, meanwhile trolls like Stupidus and Zjarri stroll around and do as they like, reverting with dismissive summaries and not bothering to discuss anything with anyone, as if they own the place [31]. And who can blame them? You're obviously a smart guy. Look around to see what's going on, don't believe everything you're told on IRC. Athenean (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for verifying my belief that you are just initiating wp:npa discussions that violate wp:civil. For the record trolls don't start 45 articles, 15 of which become featured on wp:dyk. And secondly you're welcome to initiate a second SPI(and a third after that) but whose sock will you accuse me of being this time, because the first attempt wasn't successful at all.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 07:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

@Zjarri, it seems you have a real problem here initiating an endless national advocating strategy. I would appreciate if you take Fut's comments into account [[32]].Alexikoua (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

HI dragonfly its me, maybe youre right. Plus it was late in night and maybe i got a little tired and poured my stress somewhere else. I didnt mean to call Manxharis a nobody... i should beter called him, not very known. thank you again for your role in this matter. The greek editors are sometime against albanian editors, but this doesnt mean we should not work together. Stupidus Maximus (talk) 19:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Beer

Let me buy you some beers. Cheers.Stupidus Maximus (talk) 20:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

After serving beers, I would appreciate if you restore him in Lnxhery.Alexikoua (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Deleted a page for MagnePrint

Hi DragonflySixtyseven. I see you deleted a page I created for MagnePrint. I disagree with your conclusion that is was overly promotional. Where do we go from here? Magtekmarketing (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)magtekmarketing

Grotesquely inappropriate?

Compared to what? There is a lot of stuff on user pages that could fall under that criterion and is a lot worse than my userbox but I don't see you deleting it. Why my userbox?

Here's the restrictions for Wikipedia:Userboxes:

Content restrictions

• All userboxes are governed by the civility policy.
  • Userboxes must not include incivility or personal attacks.
  • Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive.
  • Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind, commercial, political, religious, or otherwise, opinion pieces on current affairs or politics, self-promotion, or advertising.

Simply: If content is not appropriate on a user page, it is not appropriate within userboxes.

My userbox did not violate any of those guidelines, and I've looked, but I couldn't find anything that said that if it were considered "grotesquely inappropriate" by DragonflySixtyseven, then it should be deleted. That userbox was part of a collection of userboxes, some created by me, that was part of a section on my user page that was meant to parody some users and certain user pages. Parodying certain aspects of Wikipedia is a big part of my user page, and I think it adds something interesting and useful, for those who choose to view it.

I'm requesting that you undelete User:Antigrandiose/userbox/enjoysex. Antigrandiose (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Titin redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

I've started a discussion to address the redirects associated with Titin. Since you edited one or other of the redirects at some point, or discussed it on one of the talk pages, I wanted to notify you of the redirect discussion. Carcharoth (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Neutralhomer continuing to edit-war and mark non-vandalism as vandalism

Hi, I noticed you were involved with Neutralhomer (User_talk:Neutralhomer/Archive6#Consequences) not too long ago for marking non-vandalism as vandalism. He is continuing this behavior (see User_talk:Bwilkins#Neutralhomer_continuing_to_edit-war_and_mark_non-vandalism_as_vandalism for a summary), which I am very concerned about. I have no direct involvement but I don't think it is good for us to allow this kind of thing to go unchecked, and I'd like you to weigh in with solutions if you can. II | (t - c) 01:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

This user jumped the gun running to the adminship claiming I wasn't be "responsive". I just woke up from a nap. This user seems to be only out to get me blocked and not interested in talking about it when only allowing me an hour to respond to his/her talk page post. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 03:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Massacre of Kodra

Nice start, but the context-less snippets of newspaper from 100 years ago and ultra-partisan sources (e.g. Fan Noli) that give uncorroborated, gratuitously gory details need to go as well. I will remove them, if you don't mind. Athenean (talk) 18:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Snippets like these is what I'm talking about [33] [34] [35]. Poor sourcing at its worst. Athenean (talk) 19:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Salauddin Lavlu

Hi there! I'm in the process of adding Project tags to UBLPs listed here so that UBLPs can be dealt with by relevant Projects. You deleted Talk:Salauddin Lavlu (15:15, 6 May 2010 DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Salauddin Lavlu" ‎ (attempt to communicate))but not the main article page. Since this was done quite recently, I thought sensible to check in with you before I add Project templates to the page. Any reason I should not continue?--Plad2 (talk) 05:29, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the response.--Plad2 (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion Inquiry

Hi DragonflySixtyseven. Wondering if I can get a bit more info on the deletion of "ronsmap". The note said, "notability not asserted", but a simple google search would remedy that? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josepholesh (talk • contribs) 23:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

"Notability not asserted" means that the article itself didn't say anything about notability. I shouldn't have to go searching for details to prove notability when I'm reading the article. The article itself should say why the subject is notable. Otherwise it gets deleted. DS (talk) 23:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Tony Anselmo

Hello.

For your question on the Simpsons credits, I'm not sure where I would have gotten that information given that it's not true. It's possible I made a mistake, but the most likely thing is that I saw the name in episode credits and noted it from there. However, given that it's not listed on IMDb (I contribute there, hence why I would be going through the credits in the first place), I must have made an error. The additions I made to that article were from when I was quite new to Wikipedia and was not completely aware of the need to provide referenced sources, hence why I didn't provide one for that. In any case, my information seems to have been in error, so my apologies. -LainEverliving LainEverloving (talk) 07:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

About "Bar Minan" edit

You recently removed a picture and a few sentences from an article titled "Bar minan." I understand that the google screenshot isn't a valid source in encyclopedic terms, but the concept was that even the internet "admits" to the fact that there is too much "Bar Minan" immorality was the point that I was trying to express. I request that you revew the article and your change once more with that in mind; if you still feel that it shouldn't be there, then so be it. Thank you for your time, and I implore of you to reconsider your decision. Coming from the community mentioned in the article, I can tell you that the point was elucidated more by the picture. Midrashei HANC (talk) 20:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Midrashei

I had a quick look at this. I think Dragonfly's right to remove the material both times [36][37], because as written, it breached some of our content standards:

• We don't include original research and beliefs of editors in our content. Even if "everyone knows" it, a reputable reliable source must be available for claims. So for example "Contrary to what some may think, this is a perfectly acceptable usage of the word even in modern day English" - what credible source can we use to check that the claim of "perfectly acceptable" is accurate? What source can confirm the suggestion that it's true in all places and countries? Who are the "some" who may think otherwise and where is a citation of "them" thinking so?

• Wikipedia doesn'presents information, it doesn't advocate. So we don't tell people to "please learn some Torah, or ask a Persian friend".

• We don't present our own beliefs as encyclopedic fact, or make claims that "so many immoral things happen" in some place or website (which viewpoint holds they are immoral? Is this a representative viewpoint? Are there other viewpoints that don't hold it to be immoral? What do credible authorities state?)

• We don't use "screenshots I took" as "proof" of anything, same problem, its not the assessment of a credible authority speaking in a reputable published venue.

Hopefully this gives an idea how we work, and will help understand why tehse and similar are rewritten or removed, if put in an encyclopedia articles. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 22:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

- Very well, thank you for your assistance. Midrashei HANC (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

"Skirmish at Thomas McCrae's house" deletion

Hi D67,

Fair enough on the deletion as the copy stood. Is there anything preventing me from re-creating the page with that title at a later date if framed and phrased more originally (and obviously with citations)? Or is the title "Skirmish at Thomas McCrae's house" permanently tainted goods insofar as Wikipedia's concerned? TIA Natty10000 Natty10000 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

OK. So the title's fair game yet. Once I get a chance to revisit the entry, I'll be a little more thorough on my sourcing. As for the title, as far as I've been able to determine, that's the virtually universal name by which the action was known. To be honest, it'd be hard to imagine describing an action where one side has 40 combatants involved and the other 37 with just one killed betwixt the two as anything more substantial than a skirmish. :) Natty10000 (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Goodsblog

Hi. I noticed you deleted this talk page.

It helps to keep the talk pages of spammers because it makes it easier for us to find and track their sockpuppets. Here's a recent discussion on the topic with links to earlier discussions. While this particular thread is about anonymous IPs, much of it holds true for username accounts:

• Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#IPUser talkpage deletion .. again

If there's still spam on a page, you can delete the spam text and then stick a warning on the page. It's also useful to stick a tracking link for the spam domain (example: http://example.com) so we can find the page with a link search (for example, Special:Linksearch/*.example.com.

The template {{LinkSummaryLive}} does the same thing (it also adds links to a variety of tools):

• example.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.example.com

I took the liberty of restoring that page.

Thanks, --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Reverted edits

Hi, I noticed that you moved, then moved back M. Stanton Evans, in the process deleting some of the content. I just wanted to give you a heads-up that I took the liberty of reverting those moves in order to recover the lost content. I assumed that the deletion of content was inadvertent, but if I am mistaken, please let me know on the discussion page associated with that article, if you find it convenient. As a newb, I would very much appreciate pointers to any rules or guidelines I might have transgressed. Thanks for your help! 71.251.58.243 (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

re: brooke mceldowney

i wish you'd quit mangling and protecting the article on mceldowney. its vastly inaccurate, and you know it brooke -- brooke, we all know the only one that cares about your article is you, and you have to lie about yourself far too much. Please, you're not notable, you're not of any real interest, no one needs to know you exist. just give up. we're not going away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.62.120.42 (talk) 03:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

New Archive

You need to make a new archive! --HIAW! :) (talk) 19:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for John G. FitzGerald

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Question re deleted Anglia Examinations article

Hi DragonflySixtyseven. The article was deleted for being too promotional. I am instructed to contact you before creating another page under the same hearing. I have now rewritten the article, can i go ahead and publish it? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angliaexams (talk • contribs) 13:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

1971 crimes

Most details on crime cases are on articles named after the killers and victims. The category doesn't only include articles named "Murder of ...". Dimadick (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Tombstoneholiday

Hello! I've recently caught some vandalism from User:Tombstoneholiday, whose userpage doesn't exist-- as it was deleted by you as an attack page back in May. The user has made four edits this morning that constitute vandalism, and I'd like to know if you think further action or blocking is necessary. Thanks! AlexHOUSE (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Star Wars Kid

If you could comment at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_June_11#Ghyslain_Raza it would be greatly appreciated. AzureFury (talk | contribs) 21:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Novabackup

After reviewing the article guidelines for the page you deleted, Novabackup, it seems like it would be more appropriate to create a company page rather than a page for the product itself. I have a COI as I'm a representative of the company and I'm curious if there's still a way I can create a stub or page with some compiled information that individuals NOT employed at the company may not have access to, but seems to still be relevant. I've created a page that I don't believe is spam but I'm curious the best way to move forward with posting it.

Thanks for your help

DaOgre (talk) 23:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Bret_monay

Hello, I assumed that the personal pages were for testing? I did not try to submit this to the main wiki, I was wondering why it was deleted? is there a definition of the level of "silliness" that can be placed on our own personal pages? I did not realize that the personal pages here were under the scrutiny of someone? you? If it is the case that we cannot put what we wish on our personal pages, that is if we wish to learn a bit more about formating and the possibility of an article being accepted by trying various subjects or formats with data that is not personally agreable to certain readers, is it possible to have a list of who might be in charge of reading, and giving their opinion on the validity of our "TEST" material, please send me a list.

thank you, mr? MRs Dragginfly sixty- something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bret monay (talk • contribs) 19:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Tommy Gunn (artist)

I noticed the note below at Talk:Tommy Gunn (artist), which I've tagged with {{db-talk}}. As a courtesy to the editor, I'm posting it here for you, and I'll leave them a note explaining how to post on an editor's talk page. Cheers! --Fabrictramp(public) (talk) 21:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi DragonflySixtyseven,

I found today that my page has been deleted and I apologize for what I may have done wrong...I'm relatively new to writing on Wikipedia but would like to get the page back up as soon as possible. Can you please help me to get it back up? I'll fix whatever I need to and I'm sorry but as I said I'm relatively new and didn't realize I did something wrong. I also seem to be having a problem with uploading a photo as well. Any help you can provide I would appreciate it. Thank you CarolCrayola830 (talk) 03:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi I saw your response about how the page I wrote seems to have come from an external webpage..it didn't I actually wrote the information that was provided...I put it all into my own words...can you help me please I want to get the page back up as soon as possible. Thank youCrayola830 (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Quinton Hoover

Hello,

I am letting you know that Quinton Hoover has been nominated for deletion again, as part of a series of AFDs based on the deletion nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering artists, as you participated in the previous AFD for Quinton Hoover. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 07:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Conor Phillips

hi dragon-fly

i was wondering if u could help me find a page deleted on wikipedia on 25 September 2007 called Conor Phillips which i believe you deleted. i would love to view it again just for personal reasons as it was about one of my mates and he found it hilarious and said he too would love to see it again. or even if it was possible to have the text on the page sent to me.

Regards, David Matthews. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmatthews114 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Country Turtle Records

Hi DragonflySixtyseven, you once upon a time welcomed me here and thereby expressed your appreciation for my discographical work on my "American Music" site. You therefore seem to me to be the right person to kindly have a look at the discussion about that article I started a few days ago ... Do I see things falsly about those here "notability" discussions ? StefanWirz (talk) 09:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Chris McCorrister

Hi DragonflySixtyseven, I created a Wikipedia addition "WeddingsInWinnipeg.ca (magazine) which you deleted. Why? It's a magazine that has produced 14 editions! Your comments was "notability not asserted" - what does that mean. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris.mccorrister (talk • contribs) 01:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Chris. All articles on Wikipedia must satisfy our notability criteria, which on some level means that the article must be covered in reliable, third-party sources. Your article did not indicate that such sources exist. If you can provide such sources, we will be happy to undelete the article for you. Best, NW (Talk) 02:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Iraqi passport - Talk Page

I noticed you deleted the above page. Is there some particular issue if it was to be 're-instigated'? I've never come across this issue before. RashersTierney (talk) 18:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

for you

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thanks for your help on IRC, a true act of kindnessintraining Jack In 19:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Lindenhurst Memorial Library Page Deleted - why?

This morning i received a message stating that the Lindenhurst Memorial Library page has been deleted "because it looked so much like the Library's official "about us" page that even if you didn't copy-and-paste it directly from a propriety source, it would have required so much rewriting that it's more efficient to just start from scratch. Sorry." I am a library staff member and was asked to create this wikipedia page on behalf of the library. Therefore, the information on the Library's official "about us" page is our property and I don't understand why we would not be able to use it without having the page deleted. I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell me what needs to be done in order to create this page successfully so that it doesn't result in deletion. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Thank you. Lindenhurstlib (talk) 14:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

-- So what your saying is that I have to edit the text so that it no longer uses phrases such as "we" "us" "our" ect. even though it is OUR information and I am quoting OUR website? and If i do make those changes the page will not be deleted? Lindenhurstlib (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

On Patrol

Will look into that. Mind you, I quite often double check things that other people have checked already - for wrong tagging, tag removal, etc. I seem to be doing userpages at present because the other areas I used to do are being covered better - school pages especially seem to be sorted much better. And now Mean as custard is into userpages too there's less for me do do. I can get on with my real work, perhaps.... Peridon (talk) 17:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Yet another annoying talkback...

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at Gosox5555's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^~Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 19:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi

I see that there was a page about Mother India (book) that you deleted. Why ? What will be your policy if someone want to make it again...?  Jon Ascton  (talk) 04:28, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK hook removal

I found this edit. Somewhat problematic. Whilst i would agree that the hook is a bit cheezy, it was not really 'inappropriate'. Moreover, the article was duly nominated at T:TDYK and stayed posted there without any editor expressing any concern about the article or the hook. --Soman (talk) 04:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Chris McCorrister

Hi Again DragonflySixtyseven, Just following up on 'WeddingsInWinnipeg.ca' that you remove a few days ago for lack of notability criteria. We just got interview on TV by CTV (a national canadian television station) because brides were using our wedding website & magazine to help find valid vendors. Here is the text transcript & link to post/video:

Even more complaints are turning up on a forum on the Weddings in Winnipeg website.
Editor Lauren Harris has this advice for brides when choosing vendors for their big day.
"When you're meeting with these people, you need to think not just how many weddings they've done, 
but how long they've been in business," says Harris. 
Link: http://winnipeg.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100712/wpg_consumerwatch_invites_100712/20100712/?hub=WinnipegBin

Will that be enough to pass it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris.mccorrister (talk • contribs) 01:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Mountain of Israeli-Palestinian Friendship

Hello, could you please explain the move? It is how they named it with the article "the". It is in their statement. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs calls it the "Mountain of Israeli-Palestinian Friendship", not "The Mountain of Israeli-Palestinian Friendship". NW (Talk) 00:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, Guardian here provides the exact text of the statement they made, when they reached the top of the mountain. As you could see "The Mountain of Israeli-Palestinian Friendship" is in bold in that statement.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Sigh. Conflicting reliable sources! Wonderful. In this case, I think you are right then. Better to go with what the discoverers named it. NW (Talk) 02:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Then I will move back.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Chest infection

Why did you delete Talk:Chest infection? You say "not a forum" but I don't recall any discussion about this. Now it's deleted and I can't even see what it was that you objected to. (Plus wasn't there any material there that could have been kept?) The very notion that a Talk page isn't a forum is a little strange. So unless there was substantial material unrelated to the development of the article, common sense suggests you should just let be. I would like to see the page you deleted. I'm concerned this was hasty and may be an abuse of admin tools. Jason Quinn (talk) 07:20, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I would still like an answer to this, even if it is to say you can't recall. Jason Quinn (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. That's all I was after. It was on my watch list and couldn't remember if I had made any comments there. Guess not. Bye. Jason Quinn (talk) 15:59, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Publishing Technology plc

Hi DragonflySixtyseven. Regarding your edits of Publishing Technology plc, you have re-directed a Wikipedia page for an actively trading public company to that of a company that no longer exists Ingenta. You have not indicated the reason for your change or what needs to be resolved. Instead of simply reversing your edit, I am approaching you to consult on what needs to be addressed. I look forward to your prompt reply (User talk: Kilo4alpha) Kilo4alpha (talk) 09:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

IDS redirection

Hello, you redirected the IDS - Incomes Data Services page, but I can't see why it means that links from other IDS pages nolonger work. I just wondered what was the reason as undoing the change would be easier than re-creating all the links. Thanks. --Londonworkers (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Auto-patrolled rights

Thanks, I wasn't going to ask for it because many of the articles that I have made are redirects. I wasn't sure if I had passed the thresh-hold in full content articles. I hope that helps bring the burden of you guys! Sadads (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification

You may wish to take a look at this thread. NW (Talk) 00:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Please delete all of my contributions. Thank you. --Ian.thomson (talk) 04:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)