DrQuinnEskimoWoman
Welcome!
Hello, DrQuinnEskimoWoman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your note, WeijiBaikeBianji. Which one of my contributions runs afoul of NPOV? I am worried you are imputing bias to my contributions because I have only edited articles about scientific racism, a conspiracy theorist and an extermination camp talk page. DrQuinnEskimoWoman (talk) 01:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
I see that WeijiBaikeBianji addressed you about WP:NPOV above. I suggest you take the time to read it. Like WP:Verfiability states, "When reliable sources disagree, maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say, giving each side its due weight." This is especially true when it comes to controversial topics. It is not up to you to decide what are better statistics and exclude other statistics because you personally disagree with them. This is about following the literature with due weight. WP:Undue weight can also be a matter of giving one source, or an author of a source, more space than they should have. Do read up on our rules. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC)