CusterDome
Hello, CusterDome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 16:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl C or Apple C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl V or Apple V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
I lost hours of work in my sandbox article. I made numerous revisions and now it only shows a version from a few days ago.
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
- Unless you click on the "publish changes" or similarly-labeled button, any work you do remains only within your browser and its cache. You must actively save your work to Wikipedia's servers (which includes granting the release mentioned on the editing page) for it to be retained. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. I will be sure to save my work from now on. CusterDome (talk) 17:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user subpage at User:CusterDome may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:
- an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
- a workspace for a draft article
- a personal website, blog, or social media site
- a space for self-promotion or other advertising
- a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography
The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles.
The link to your store on your user page is almost certainly a violation of the user page policy. Other problems are formatting it as a fake Wikipedia page and probably some of the external links. The link to your LinkedIn page might be okay. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I edited my user subpage and removed most of the content.
- Also, I have drafted my first page and I wondered if you could look it over? It is located here:
- User:CusterDome/sandbox/1
- Thank you. CusterDome (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Ouabache sculpture
editDear CusterDome. I just reviewed your article in your sandbox and made some changes. I've also added some comments for you within "" (for your info, anything added within the delimiters "" will be considered as a comment and will not be displayed in the article). Please include only those sources that actually talks about the sculpture. Others can be removed. Any info that the source doesn't have and was "built" by us will be considered original research and our own synthesis, which are not allowed in Wiki articles. Hope this helps. Please feel free to revert any of my changes that you feel is not correct. Once you finalize these corrections, you can go ahead and create the article using the article wizard. Cheers. Rasnaboy (talk) 04:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Rasnaboy, thank you for looking over my article. I implemented the edits that you suggested. I also added a new section named "Reception" and wanted to see if these additions are okay? I followed the Wikipedia guideline you suggested and didn't include any citations that didn't mention the Ouabache sculpture. Also, I obtained an image of the original plaque from the sculptor's widow. I am not sure how to cite this in the article. Thank you for helping with this! CusterDome (talk) 14:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- I created a citation and used a screenshot of a text message exchange with Rebecca McNeely, the sculptor's widow. CusterDome (talk) 18:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright and Wikipedia
editHello CusterDome! Your additions to Albert Pearson Stewart have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I obtained permission from the copyright owners to use images from the Boilermaker Music Makers book. I posted pdfs of the emails between me and the author of the book (Bennett) and the head of Purdue Musical Organizations.
- Is the article okay now that edits were made? CusterDome (talk) 02:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Albert Pearson Stewart
editHello CusterDome! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Albert Pearson Stewart, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from ISBN 0931682215, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en wikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Albert Pearson Stewart, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Mikeblas (talk) 02:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I received permission to use material from the source cited. I published an email exchange with author Joseph L. Bennet and William E. Griffel the head of Purdue Music Organizations. The emails are posted as PDFs under my Wikimedia Commons space for CusterDome. CusterDome (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the copyright holder for Boilermaker Music Makers has been unable to send an email to permissions-wikimedia.org. He can't get the email to recognized this as a valid address. I tried a test email and obtained the same problem. Oddly it works on my iPhone. Are you willing to reach out to William Griffel at Purdue university? His email is [email protected]. Thanks! CusterDome (talk) 12:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I wanted to ask if you will review the status of the Albert Pearson Stewart Wikipedia page? I obtained permission from William Griffel of Purdue University to use scanned images from the Boilermaker Music Maker (Bennett) book published in 1987. Mr. Griffel sent an email to [email protected] stating that he has allowed the materal from the Bennett book to be used for the Albert Pearson Stewart page. I wanted to know if this is sufficient to allow the page to be reinstated, or is there not hope at all in this regard? Thanks. CusterDome (talk) 02:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Albert Pearson Stewart
editHello CusterDome! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Albert Pearson Stewart, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from ISBN 0931682215, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en wikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Albert Pearson Stewart, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! CusterDome (talk) 02:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Albert Pearson Stewart
editHello CusterDome! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Albert Pearson Stewart, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from ISBN 0931682215, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en wikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Albert Pearson Stewart, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Albert Pearson Stewart saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi CusterDome. Thank you for your work on Fisherman's Memorial (Palacios, Texas). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you helping with this! CusterDome (talk) 12:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi CusterDome. Thank you for your work on Napoleon III Telescope (University of Notre Dame). Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work. You should run a copyvio check such as Wikipedia:EARWIG on your articles as they are sending up copyvio red flags on the system. You are clearly not pasting in chunks of copyrighted material on this article, but by running the Earwig you can see that even short terms and phrases are picked up. No need to alter standard terms/names/titles, but helpful to even avoid using the same phrases where possible. Hope that is of help and nice contributions!. thanks.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Aszx5000 (talk) 11:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you reviewing the page. I will use Earwig in my future articles. Thanks! CusterDome (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi CusterDome. Thank you for your work on Project GRAND. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
You need to use many more sources that are not part of the Project GRAND; currently far too many are. Also, please remove bio information about John Poirier (off topic). Last, most importantly, you need independent secondary sources that demonstrate that this project was important. Currently I have doubts about notability.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Ldm1954 (talk) 08:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for reviewing the Project GRAND page. I am working on addressing the concerns that you raised. Thanks CusterDome (talk) 15:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)