Charleswallace666

Welcome!

Hello, Charleswallace666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Friskies does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Beauty School Dropout (talk) 02:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Fug u Charleswallace666 (talk) 02:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nestlé Purina PetCare. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nestlé Purina PetCare, you may be blocked from editing. 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Fug u Charleswallace666 (talk) 02:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Fug u

Im talking to you yexstorn and dropout Charleswallace666 (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nestlé Purina PetCare.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Nestlé Purina PetCare was changed by Charleswallace666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931088 on 2017-12-29T02:27:24 00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Fug u Charleswallace666 (talk) 02:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Yexstorm2001. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 02:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 02:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Fug u Charleswallace666 (talk) 02:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

{ {unblock|reason= I promise not to vandalize Wikipedia pages anymore. I thought it was funny at first, but now, it sucks that I can't edit anymore. If I vandalize another wiki page, I will take a lifetime ban because I deserve it. Charleswallace666 (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)} } Charleswallace666 (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Yuh Charleswallace666 (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry Charleswallace666 (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)