Cabayi

User:Line which 1200

Hi Cabyi. Since I often work on file related stuff with Fastily and have their user talk page on my watchlist, I noticed what was going on at User talk:Line which 1200. Line which 1200's response to your unblock request decline seems to have moved into NLT territory in addition to more BLP violations. It might seem a little quick, but perhaps taking away their tpa should be considered because I don't see any indication that Line which 1200 is going to stop trying to right whatever great wrong they perceive to have been inflicted upon them and will likely continue their BLPCOI against the other person they've been referring to on their user page and user talk page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Marchjuly, to me it reads like the user is clumsily claiming a legal right to freedom of expression. ESL issues maybe? I guess we'll have to wait for the ten days to expire. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Cabayi (talk) 09:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

OK, they persisted in using their talk page inappropriately. Access revoked. Cabayi (talk) 10:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for watching this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Not Edit Warring

You have accused me of an edit war when I was replacing sourced facts that have been removed by non registered users. MerryPranksters (talk) 08:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

You have not engaged in any discussion on the article's talk page. WP:BRD applies. You now have a 24 hour gap to engage in constructive discussion rather than reverting each other and leaving messages only in your edit summaries. Cabayi (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I have added a section to the Ted Williams talk page, seeking consensus on religion and Ted Williams.24.184.21.30 (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

You placed a block

Question from user

Dear Cabayi, you admonished me for adding material to the Ted Williams page without a source. If you look at the editing history, you will see, first, that I have repeatedly added a reference to the Ben Bradlee Jr. biography of Ted Williams, and that another user has repeatedly removed it. Second, you will see that I have removed the unencyclopedic statements of opinion by this other user. Here is what he has posted, in various forms, and that I have removed: Referring to Williams's atheism, as documented by his biographers, "Though this was mostly fabricated by writers after he died. There are no credible sources to prove this. This was perpetuated by two of his children to convince the courts to allow them to freeze their father." This other user may have a strong belief that something was "fabricated," but he offers no source for this. This other user may have a strong belief that something was "perpetuated," or why that was done, but he offers no source for this. I suspect that you have barred me from editing because I am not a registered user, not because you have looked at the editing trail in this case. Why allow opinion to be posted? Why punish a user who removes opinion? Even now, that user has posted that Ted Williams's belief, or non belief, has been "disproven." I hope we all agree that this is not something that can be "disproven." That's the opinion of the user, not a fact, not encyclopedic. That user repeatedly removes references, and sources, pointing to biographers describing Ted Williams as an atheist. What should we do about that? How does blocking me cure that?24.184.21.30 (talk) 16:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

24.184.21.30, it ensures that, for 24 hours at least, you and MerryPranksters engage in meaningful discussion to achieve WP:CONSENSUS rather than flipping content back and forth. It would be better if the two of you did that on the article's talk page rather than here. Other folks who have an interest in the article may want to chip in. Cabayi (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind reply. I have added a section to the Ted Williams talk page, seeking consensus on religion and Ted Williams.24.184.21.30 (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Article Reviewed

Hello, thank you for your attention to the Bernadette Thompson article! I would like to clarify that the article has already been reviewed and assigned a C-class rating, which indicates that it is suitable for mainspace. Some of the messages regarding citations for verification and neutrality were worked on prior to this review. Given that it meets notability and verification standards, and that there is sufficient consensus supporting its placement in the mainspace, I will be reverting the article back to its original location.

I appreciate your efforts to maintain quality, and any further improvements can still be made directly within the mainspace. Thank you for your understanding! Fashionista345 (talk) 16:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Contributions

Hi there @Cabayi and thank you for help to rename my username. And I have a concern regarding my contributions, when I decline a draft submission I didn't know that my username was changed already so the edits were log at the IP address I use which are these: [1], [2], [3]. Is there a way to transfer it to my contributions? 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 09:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Windborne Rider, sorry, there is no mechanism to reassign the edits made by one account (or an IP) to another user. Cabayi (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@Cabayi Oh alright. Thank you again for renaming my username. Cheers, 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 09:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello!

Hi @Cabayi and thank you for help to rename my username. Actually, I am facing some problem in my AFC. There is one error to show me (AFCH error: user not listed AFCH could not be loaded because "Jannatulbaqi" is not listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. You can request access to the AfC helper script there. If you wish to disable the helper script, click here. If you have any questions or concerns, please get in touch!) Please help me! Jannatulbaqi (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Jannatulbaqi  Done. Cabayi (talk) 19:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)