Western genre staples

edit

[1] Why not relist? SpinningSpark 15:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Spinningspark: That's fine too. I was hovering between the two, but I think since Jc37's remarks came so late, I think it's worth a relist. bibliomaniac15 18:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I did something stupid a few years ago and didn't understand the consequences. I asked for help to create a page about something the police developed in the 1960s called Operation Identification. It's an important topic deserving of a place on Wikipedia. Would you consider allowing it to be posted? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Identification — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trimster2 (talkcontribs) 18:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm a bit concerned about the result of this CfD. The discussion regrettably didn't pick up on the fact that not all the articles in the category are actually about African-American people: Amadou Diallo was from Guinea and only arrived in the U.S. in his 20s; Ousmane Zongo was Burkinabé; Abdul Razak Ali Artan was Somali; perhaps others besides. It's of course possible that these people considered themselves African-American, but ordinarily the term refers to people born in the U.S., naturalised citizens, and/or people who've lived there a long time. I'm not objecting to your close of course, which clearly reflected the consensus, but the WP:MR guidance is insistent that these things be discussed with the closer first, and as I don't usually pay much attention to CfD your thoughts on the best course would be appreciated. Thanks, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Arms & Hearts: Hey there, thanks for letting me know! This does seem like new information that wasn't discussed before, so I think that the best course of action would be to open up a new CFD, mentioning your rationale and the fact that you discussed this with me (so it isn't seen as a contentious reopening). If you want, I can also open up the CFD for you as a procedural matter. bibliomaniac15 18:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The category was a subcat of Category:African-American people and so the objection of Arms & Hearts applies to the placing Ousmane Zongo and Abdul Razak Ali Artan in this category under either name. An answer would be to create a parent such as Category:People of African descent shot dead by law enforcement officers in the United States, subcat of Category:People of African descent. (There is no Category:Black people: it was deleted at cfd in 2006.) Oculi (talk) 18:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks both. Yes, Oculi, that does complicate things – although, to complicate things further, aren't the above-named people African people rather than people of African descent? (There may still be others who are African-Canadian, Black British etc. though.) I'll go ahead with the new CfD and try and summarise the issues. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I have added {{cfd-manual}} and listed the task at WP:CFDWM. – Fayenatic London 17:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of my redirect

edit

Hello. I recently created this redirect. However, as you can see, there is a typographical mistake in it. Nothing links to this redirect. So, could you delete this redirect? Veverve (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Veverve:   Done bibliomaniac15 05:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

cfd

edit

Just an fyi - It looks like only half of them were renamed. - jc37 08:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Jc37: You'll need to give it time for the bot to make it through all of them. It was working on them as you sent me this message. They're all done now, as far as I can tell. bibliomaniac15 22:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oh ok, great. Sometimes the bots get "stuck" (among other possible issues), so I thought I'd let you know just in case. Glad that there wasn't an issue. - jc37 00:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just wondering if you missed the updated functions of JJMC89's bot for CFD. Try the Retain part of WP:CFDW; it even posts the Old CfD templates. We just have to follow the syntax requirements on that page. – Fayenatic London 22:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Fayenatic london: I'm aware of the Retain function; it's just that XFDCloser was updated to do the same thing automatically for retain situations. Just cutting out the middleman, er, middlebot! bibliomaniac15 01:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC) PS: Thanks for the archive restructuring!Reply

GAN mentor question

edit

Hello! I saw you listed as one of the mentors over at GAN. I am back to editing after a long absence, and I was wondering if you could take a look at a recent review I completed for Cyrtophora citricola. Any feedback is welcome and there is no rush. Thank you! -Pax Verbum 05:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Confused about CfD

edit

I noticed that you closed this discussion as delete on Sep 11. But 12 days later, the category still seems to exist (although it is nominated for speedy deletion by JPxG). I'm unfamiliar with CfD, so this confuses me. I know that with AfDs, an article link becomes red pretty soon after the discussion is closed as "delete". Any insights would be appreciated, thanks VR talk 17:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

edit

Administrators' newsletter – October 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
  • Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
  • The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

  Miscellaneous

  • Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
  • The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

edit

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

edit

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  A TrainBerean HunterEpbr123GermanJoeSanchomMysid

  Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

  Arbitration



User you just banned is abusing their talk page

edit

Hey. The user you just banned is currently abusing their talk page and the edit history of that talk page. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Sideswipe9th: Looks like others have taken care of it. bibliomaniac15 03:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

edit

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Candidates in Canadian elections

edit

I wanted to ask you about your closure of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 2#Category:Christian Heritage Party of Canada candidates in the 1988 Canadian federal election, because you treated the two parent categories differently from each other on grounds where there wasn't actually a difference between them.

Specifically, you decided to keep Category:Christian Heritage Party of Canada candidates for the Canadian House of Commons on the grounds that it also had list overview articles like Christian Heritage Party of Canada candidates in the 1988 Canadian federal election — but if that's grounds for keeping that category, then Category:Co-operative Commonwealth Federation candidates for the Canadian House of Commons also has to be kept, because list overview articles like Co-operative Commonwealth Federation candidates in the 1940 Canadian federal election were present there too. So such lists can't be grounds for keeping one category but not the other, if both categories had them — either they both have to be kept on the grounds of the list articles that they both have, or they both have to be deleted regardless of the list articles. We can't treat them differently from each other on grounds that didn't actually make them any different from each other. Bearcat (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Bearcat: Thanks for pointing that out. On further investigation, the problem actually seems to be that the Commonwealth Federation candidate overview articles were actually never placed in Category:Co-operative Commonwealth Federation candidates for the Canadian House of Commons; they are only categorized in the "Candidates in the XXXX Canadian federal election" category tree. By contrast, the Christian Heritage party articles are in both trees. Unfortunately, when I closed the CFD, I only noticed that the Commonwealth Federation category had non-overview articles in it, so I had listed it for deletion. I will restore it and populate it in a similar fashion to Category:Christian Heritage Party of Canada candidates for the Canadian House of Commons (which needs to be purged of non-overview articles anyway). bibliomaniac15 23:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Depopulation of category deleted via CfD

edit

Category:Government bodies in New Jersey with .gov websites is still populated, despite your closure of the relevant CfD as "delete". I believe the the other categories listed have already been deleted and depopulated. Alansohn (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Alansohn: Thanks for letting me know. I've added it to WP:CFD/W. bibliomaniac15 20:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much for taking care of this and doing it so quickly. Alansohn (talk) 21:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas!

edit
  CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

edit

Merchandise giveaway nomination

edit
 
A token of thanks

Hi Bibliomaniac15! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk ~~~~~
 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!

edit

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!

 


We're beginning to plan in-person and virtual events for 2022, and your support is needed as we re-launch the LA User Group.
Please get involved! If you have ideas, or if you're interested in helping to lead the group, leave a note at Ideas for 2022 on our talk page.


Join our Facebook group here.

To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

--JSFarman (talk) 02:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

How we will see unregistered users

edit

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

LA to FA 2022

edit
LA to FA 2022
 

Dear Bibliomaniac15,

You're invited to a zoom call, taking place on February 11, with the goal of improving the article on Los Angeles to Featured article status! I often find it daunting to approach the Big Subjects on my own—so if you, like me, want a time to sit down with fellow dedicated editors and tackle something important and complex, this is the zoom for you! I, unfortunately, have no way to transmit snacks over zoom; but I trust you to exercise good judgement and discretion in selecting snacks of your own. Hope to see you there—if you're interested, add your name here!

theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/she) 00:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.Reply

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 27 February 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Peer review request

edit

Does "CVG", listed as one of the topics you deal with on the peer review volunteer list, stand for "computer video games"? I am asking because I would like to request feedback for a video game article that is on peer review. I would definitely appreciate it, for I have plans to nominate it for featured article candidacy. The game’s named Fallout, and the peer review can be accessed here. Of course, it is possible that CVG does not stand for computer video games. Don’t feel too inclined to provide feedback. Lazman321 (talk) 05:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

CFD backlog

edit

Hi, I hope you are well.

If you have time, please could you help out some more at CFD? I think I am now WP:INVOLVED on all the ones at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Old_unclosed_discussions dated up to 31 January. – Fayenatic London 19:50, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Fayenatic london: Hey there, I've been pretty busy IRL, which is why I haven't been closing CFDs these days. But I'll take a look the next couple days and knock a few of them out. I'm gonna give a shoutout to a vet who's been active in closing XFDs these days: Explicit, would you be down to chip at some of the CFD backlog? bibliomaniac15 00:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


New administrator activity requirement

edit

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Requesting help to stop vandalism on Chinese Australians

edit

User:TyronMcLannister is vandalising the wikipage Chinese Australians by repeatedly removing Chinese Australians of partial European descent despite leaving out other wikipages Cornish Australians and German Australians that contain famous figures that are of mixed cornish and mixed german ancestry as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rooveaouravevo (talkcontribs) 05:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • This is a brand-new account whose entire field of interest is original research in citing sources in specific two articles:[2] and [3], as well as changing the established definition of ethnicity in the article to its own. My friendly and polite attempts [4] to explain to the new user that it is necessary to cooperate and seek consensus with other editors based on reliable sources were unsuccessful, he began a vindictive action of accusing me of vandalism and spamming these accusations, including on the administrators talk pages as we can see. Clear case of WP:NOTHERE. TyronMcLannister (talk) 12:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion review for Religious community

edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Religious community. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --evrik (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Evrik: Generally speaking, before you start a DR, you should just contact the closing admin first to see if it's necessary in the first place. Your request is pretty uncontroversial and doesn't really require extra discussion; I've gone ahead and undeleted for history purposes, as you requested. bibliomaniac15 04:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Always precious

edit
 

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Updates to bureaucrat minimum activity requirements

edit

Hello Bibliomaniac15.

Following a discussion at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard, the minimum activity requirements for bureaucrats have been updated to also include the the recently updated minimum editing requirements for administrators (i.e. at least 100 edits every 5 years). This will be enforced beginning in January 2023. Should you no longer wish to volunteer as a bureaucrat you may request removal at SRP and.or let us know at WP:BN.

Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

edit

Bureaucrat Chat

edit

Your input is requested at the freshly-created bureaucrat chat. Useight (talk) 03:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

DHMO

edit

Hi. I hope you are doing well. just saw your comment at the crat chat regarding Tamzin's RfA. In special:diff/1085684314, I was talking about the same RfA. Nice coincidence, eh? —usernamekiran (talk) 17:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Haha I think referencing that RFA shows my wiki-age more than anything. I think it was memorable to me because it was the very first RFA to hit WP:300, but of course, there were certainly more contemporary RFAs I could have referenced instead. bibliomaniac15 18:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Komodo dragon

edit

Hello, I was looking at the Komodo dragon article, which is at this point a very old FA. (It's currently on the list at URFA.) I was actually on the article looking for information about the distribution of the current population, and this feels an area that the article currently lacks. There's isolated notes about a couple of populations and the infobox map, but no section discussing it. A section covering this sort of info for example, would be great, incorporating perhaps that last current paragraph in the main Conservation section. Aside from that, I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the quality of the article as it stands now, with relation to the FA criteria. There's some areas where the prose will need rewriting, but I am not sure if this is a large job or a small one. Thoughts welcome, and thank you of course for putting together this page back in the day. Best, CMD (talk) 08:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know! I think the article definitely shows its age, and there have been several parts that have been added over time, especially with regards to newer developments about venom. If I'm being honest, I've been kind of anticipating an audit of the article these past few years. Unfortunately, my activity has been rather low these past months (and probably through June as well) because of busyness IRL, so I'm not sure how much bandwidth I'll have. But I'll see what I can do on my spare time. Thanks so much for letting me know. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Bibliomaniac15, I've had another look at this, and I'm afraid I've come to the conclusion that updating this article would be a large job, not a small one. I've added a summary of some issues on the article talkpage, and listed this as a formal URFA notification. Generally this leads to a formal review after two to three weeks if there is no action, but the timeframe isn't that important so let me know if it's something you would have time to work on. I actually wish I had time to work on this topic myself, but sadly I am also quite busy irl and already have a backlog of wiki to do items that I am not getting to. CMD (talk) 12:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I will be out of town this coming week with little Internet access so I won't be on Wikipedia at all. On the side, I've been compiling some research but it has been a long time since I've really touched the article too. Thanks so much for your review. I'll take a closer look when I get back. bibliomaniac15 17:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

edit
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5 good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
Click here to opt out of any future messages.

(t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

  Arbitration


The Signpost: 26 June 2022

edit

Hello I need to say that I like you so enjoy your day Mr. Bibliomainac fiveteen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usethename2 (talkcontribs) 23:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

  Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

 

  Administrator changes

  Valereee
  Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • CapitalistroadsterSamsara

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

  Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

  Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working#Retain

edit

I think you need the first line as no consensus to delete per the bot instructions. Thanks for your work on closing CFDs! — Qwerfjkltalk 07:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up! And thank you for closing CFDs...this is the cleanest I've ever seen things! bibliomaniac15 17:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

  Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

Please vote in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election

edit

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy Fourteenth Bureaucratship Anniversary!

edit
   Wishing Bibliomaniac15 a very happy bureaucratship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Reply

Happy Bureaucratship Anniversary!

edit

Komodo dragon FAR

edit

I have nominated Komodo Dragon for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. CMD (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ScottishFinnishRadish bureaucrat chat

edit

Hi Bibliomaniac15, I have started a bureaucrat discussion for ScottishFinnishRadish's RfA. It can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ScottishFinnishRadish/Bureaucrat chat. Thanks in advance. Acalamari 01:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Need help from Italy - please

edit

Sorry to disturb you but i need some help. I'm a non registered user writing from Italy. I don't know if you can help me but i hope that you can check if there's some mischievous activity going on on the italian wiki. The situation that i'm going to explain in a few lines is really quite strange. Strange to the point that an administrator user back in Italy is protecting or somehow allowing a set of "harmful" actions by a group of users.

A month ago i tried to correct some data on a page on wikipedia italy. The data that i corrected consisted of readily verifiable facts that could not result unknown to someone that has a knowledge of the argument described in the relative voice. The page that i tried to contribute to is just the page of "Scuderia Ferrari", a simple sport, historical page, not a big deal, at lest in my mind. So i expected everything to run smoothly. I was utterly wrong. I found myself in a subsequent series of "Godfather movie" situations.

A group of users, aided by some privileged ones, are modyfying the chronology of the page (at the code level) and de facto cancel every contribution (both at the page level, at the discussion level and are even able to erase themselves out of the chronology of the modifcations when they put out offensive remarks or make some other mischief). This is an inexplicably childish behaviour that acts against everything wikipedia should be, an open contribution tool that with cooperation tools aids the users to better the quality of the free hypertext. What i'm finding particularly wrong is the erase process of the discussion page. I had spent some time to put on the page all the things that could help in reaching an informed consensus about the subject ( corroborating facts, a set of bibliographical references, a set of questions that could allow the users to share their knowledge on the subject and focus on the key points in order to clear the argument). If one, in addition to rapid, vaguely justified if justified at all, rollback actions, cancels the chronolgy it becomes impossible even for future users to check the facts and take part in the discussion.

Wiki is a wonderfull instrument but, if you give it to the wrong people or if the wrong people have too much power, it becomes useless.

I tried to contact you, as an outside user administrator, because i hope that you could check what i say in an independent, maybe anonymous way, with a level of competency that is higher than the mere "edit war" conflict.

Thank you Alberto

P.S. I'll try also to make these things known to a random user administrator in Italy and hope for the best 151.68.183.39 (talk) 11:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


TFA nom for history of timekeeping devices

edit

I have nominated history of timekeeping devices to be today's featured article on January 1. You are invited to comment on the nomination by clicking here. Z1720 (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

CfD request

edit

Would you mind closing the open discussions of September and early October at WP:CFD? It concerns only a very limited number of discussions but it gets about time they are closed. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the late reply. I'll be looking into them this week. bibliomaniac15 23:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

edit

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

 

  CheckUser changes

  TheresNoTime

  Oversight changes

  TheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Ambassador of Chinese request

edit

Hi. I noticed you are an ambassador for the Chinese language. I was wondering if you could add a sound file with the pronunciation of the Chinese language name in Chinese in the linked relevant page. Here is an example in the Swedish language page. Even though it is one of the most spoken languages in the world, in English few people know how it is called and pronounced in Chinese. It would be a great addition. Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

edit

TFA

edit
January songs
 
happy new year

Thank you and the whole team today for the article, introduced (in 2008!): "This is the second Tzatziki Squad collaboration up for your scrutiny." - A timely contribution! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

today, I point at two singers I whose performance I enjoyed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

Bureaucrat chat - invitation to participate

edit

The RfA for MB has gone to a bureaucrat chat. Please join in the discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
  • Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
  • The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a [p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Thriller drama cat

edit

Quick question about manually re-organizing the thriller drama category. (as discussed here). I've started slowly going through some of the categories just making sure the genres match prose in the articles and doing some mild cleaning here and there. Is the best way to do it do you think? I haven't done any category organizing in a while. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yep, that looks fine. Thanks for being bold! bibliomaniac15 01:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 8 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

edit

Nice to meet you

edit

Hi,I am anonymous user. बॉट has also added a description of Bangladesh Congress President Shirin Sharmin Chaudhury as acting president, even though he has not served as president.Others have added English to the official language of Equatorial Guinea. What should me do. please make a prudent decision.240F:31:3402:1:44C6:DFA8:21CE:17C0 (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shirin Sharmin likely to become Bangladesh's first woman President बॉट (talk) 06:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
If so, please add it after her is officially sworn in as president. The official languages of Equatorial Guinea are Spanish, French, and Portuguese. No other languages are official. We can talk about the rest on my talk page.240F:31:3402:1:44C6:DFA8:21CE:17C0 (talk) 06:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
bot-related nonsense
MALABO, Equatorial Guinea, June 24, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Republic of Equatorial Guinea recently added the French language to the official government's website. The government's portal can now be accessed in Spanish, English and French, which is the country's second official language. This is an effort by the government to improve its communications, add to the resources offered by the country, and increase its information delivery for the 17th African Union Summit taking place in Malabo June 23-July 1 with the theme "Accelerating Youth Empowerment for Sustainable Development." बॉट (talk) 06:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sometimes, an IP address or username Bogdan Uleiagets blocked for inappropriate behavior. If you've never used Wikipedia before and are getting this message, your IP address may not be registered. बॉट (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I apologize for my previous wrong response. Upon closer examination, I see that the IPs in question are IPv6 addresses. IPv6 is the latest version of the Internet Protocol (IP), which is used to connect devices on a network. 240F:31:3402:1:D9:3326:4F37:89A1 बॉट (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

  Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 19 June 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  Novem Linguae
 

  Bureaucrat changes

  MBisanz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

edit

Please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pppery/Bureaucrat chat and join the discussion when you have an opportunity. Maxim (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  Firefangledfeathers
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Novem Linguae

  Technical news

  Arbitration


The Signpost: 15 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

  Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

edit

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  0xDeadbeef
  Tamzin
  Dennis Brown

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery
 

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 20 November 2023

edit

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

Deletion Request

edit

Hello! I am a Wikipedia IP editor and I wanted to draw your attention to the page which I came across "Qatari support for Hamas" is containing libelous material as the content of the page already exists on multiple different pages like "Hamas" and "2023 Israel–Hamas war". The page contains defamatory statement concerning the party involved. As per my knowledge It is a Wikipedia policy to immediately delete libelous material when it has been identified. Page revisions containing libelous content should also be removed from the page history. Libelous material (otherwise known as defamation) is reasonably likely to damage a person or company's reputation and could expose Wikipedia to legal consequences.

It is an extended protected page and I am an IP user, I hope you will attend my request. Thank you! 37.252.191.68 (talk) 05:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, if you have a specific edit request for that page, you're going to want to post on the talk page at Talk:Qatari support for Hamas instead of here. bibliomaniac15 20:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Time travel in Star Trek has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Time travel in Star Trek has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 09:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 10 January 2024

edit

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

edit

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

 

  CheckUser changes

  Wugapodes

  Interface administrator changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

  Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

  Miscellaneous


LA Meetup: February 17, 2024

edit
Edit-a-thon and Wikipedia Day Celebration
 

Please join Wikimedians of Los Angeles on Saturday, February 17 from 12:00 to 4:00 pm for a Los Angeles and West Hollywood-themed edit-a-thon at the West Hollywood Library. (For the details and to sign up, see Wikipedia:Meetup/Los Angeles/February 2024.)

We'll also be celebrating Wikipedia's 23rd birthday/Wikipedia Day. (There will be cake!)

We hope to see you there! JSFarman via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Join our Facebook group here.
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

edit

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 2 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

edit

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

edit

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Nyttend
 

  Bureaucrat changes

  Nihonjoe
 

  CheckUser changes

  Joe Roe

  Oversight changes

  GeneralNotability

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

edit
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

edit

June 8, 2024

edit
  The Return of the LA Wiknic
Eat, drink, and bask in the glory of Los Angeles in early June at the 9th not-annual Wiknic!

Saturday, June 8 from 11:30 to 2:30 pm
Pan Pacific Park
7600 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles CA 90036
Get the details and RSVP here.
(It's a potluck. There's a wish list on the meetup page.)
Get the details and join WikiLA here.
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Graham Beards
 

  Bureaucrat changes

 
 

  Oversight changes

  Dreamy Jazz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 8 June 2024

edit

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

edit

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 22 July 2024

edit

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Isabelle Belato
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno
 

  CheckUser changes

  Barkeep49

  Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

  Arbitration


The Signpost: 14 August 2024

edit

Edit-a-thon August 24

edit
 
August 24: Not just an edit-a-thon, an edit-a-thon in Manhattan Beach.

Please join WikiLA at an edit-a-thon to improve and create articles related to marine life and the ocean in the Los Angeles area. Inspiration courtesy of the public library in Manhattan Beach, one of SoCal's most beautiful coastal communities.
Saturday, August 24 from 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM
Manhattan Beach Public Library, 1320 Highland Ave., Manhattan Beach 90266

Get the details and RSVP here
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups remove.your name, from this list.

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Pppery

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery
 

  Oversighter changes

  Wugapodes

  CheckUser changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


TPA

edit

Hi there, can you please revoke TPA here? [5] ~delta (talkcont) 03:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done bibliomaniac15 03:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

edit

Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule

edit
Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule
 
  • Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed.
  • We plan to use the following schedule:
    • Oct 8 – Oct 14: Candidate sign-up
    • Oct 22 – Oct 24: Discussion phase
    • Oct 25 – Oct 31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
  • If you are interested in helping out, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections § Ways to help. There are many redlinked subpages that can be created.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

edit

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  CheckUser changes

 
 

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

edit

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
  • The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

edit

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

edit
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

edit
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  CheckUser changes

  Maxim

  Oversighter changes

  Maxim

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 6 November 2024

edit

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

edit

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply