Talk Page Archives:
Archive 1 (9 February – 5 August 2006)
Archive 2 (17 June – 7 September 2006)
Archive 3 (8 September – 11 November 2006)
Archive 4 (11 November – 4 March 2007)
Archive 5 (6 March 2007 – 21 May 2007)
Archive 6 (22 May 2007 – 10 July 2007}
Archive 7 (10 July 2007 – 18 August 2007)
Archive 8 (20 August 2007 – 11 October 2007)
Archive 9 (10 October 2007 – 23 November 2007)
Archive 10 (24 November 2007 – 19 January 2008)
Archive 11 (23 January 2008 – 17 April 2008)
Archive 12 (19 April 2008 – 6 July 2008)
Archive 13 (7 July 2008 – 1 February 2009)
Archive 14 (3 February 2009 – 22 March 2009)
Archive 15 (26 March 2009 – 1 August 2009)
Archive 16 (1 August 2009 – 27 January 2010)
Archive 17 (27 January – 28 June 2010)
Archive 18 (5 July 2010 – 8 March 2017)
Archive 19 (20 March 2018 – )

Welcome back.

edit

Welcome back, Andrew.

I have you on my watchlist because you were a respected senior Wikipedian. I saw the BN notes about your adminship. Your first RfA was very successful, and I look forward to supporting your reconfirmation. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

1 Jehochman Talk 03:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

FYI on inactivity changes

edit

Hello Andrew c, just wanted to follow up with you directly from WP:BN. First, welcome back! In February 2017 I personally sent you emails that were basically a copy of the notices you see above on the page. I only have the Copy of your message to Andrew c: Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity copies that the system generates, so I can't tell if they were successfully delivered, only that we tried. Certain mail providers were having trouble with wikimail, especially yahoo, and we have done some software work to improve this over time. You may want to try to email your self using wikimail to see if it is working now. As for the "5 year" rule, it is a new rule that got implemented just a couple of weeks ago (see Special:PermaLink/831122935#RFC:_Slight_tweak_to_lengthy_inactivity_policy). If you would like rollback or pending changes review flags on right now, let me know (please use {{ping}} if replying here) and I'll be happy to flip them for you, or just stop by WP:PERM whenever you want. Happy editing, — xaosflux Talk 03:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back. We dont know each-other, I saw your thread at b'crat noticeboard. I hope you stay around. —usernamekiran(talk) 06:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disagreed with the crats

edit

I saw your post on the crat board, and their response. I flat disagree with them. You were a sysop, you have a clean record over here, no issues, and they didn't see fit to return your bit to you ? Please! That's what WP:IAR is for. Suggesting that you go through an RFA, when You've already been through one which was extremely successful is unnecessary, in the least.  ►К Ф Ƽ Ħ◄  R.I.P Trip Halstead 12:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Seems punitive to me, and if that was the intent, great. Sounds like I need to earn it again, and as someone just testing the waters after finding out I was desysoped, how likely am I going to jump back in with gusto now? I guess there are 2 camps, the type of people who want to prove everyone wrong, and the type of people that will get pushed away. I'm likely the latter, in all honesty. But maybe I'll prove them wrong. -Andrew c [talk] 21:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Further discussion

edit

In case anyone wants to join in is right here on this board. Feel free to join in.  ►К Ф Ƽ Ħ◄  R.I.P Trip Halstead 13:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Andrew c. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Andrew c. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Second Amendment sanctuary

edit

I just left a comment on the Second Amendment sanctuary talk page concerning Marquette Co, MI and related matters. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion. --Mox La Push (talk) 06:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

"A woman's right to choose" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A woman's right to choose. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13#"Right to choose" redirects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (they/she) | o toki tawa mi. 06:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Detective Megan Wheeler (Julianne Nicholson).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Detective Megan Wheeler (Julianne Nicholson).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Lemon-edit1.jpg nominated for delisting from Wikipedia:Featured pictures

edit

Please see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Lemon. MER-C 16:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:NCAA Division I men's lacrosse tournament venues has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:NCAA Division I men's lacrosse tournament venues has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 22:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply