June 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Vortex tube, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Vallejo, California because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven (talk) 02:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Ansonia, Connecticut, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Widr (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sikorsky CH-53K Super Stallion, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not add it again unless you provide a reliable sources that supports it. Thomas.W talk 18:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sikorsky CH-53K Super Stallion. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's rules and guides regarding what types of sources that are considered reliable and how to cite references before even trying to add it again. Thomas.W talk 19:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Talk:Gamergate controversy‎. I greatly appreciate your efforts to make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (192.249.47.186) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Avono (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Account

edit

Have you considered making an account? It would prevent the IPv6 attribution issue you came to. You could even name the account something like Formerly19224947186. Hipocrite (talk) 15:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Gamergate alert

edit
Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed., a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Gamergate Talk "Ping"

edit

I just wanted to let you know that I tried (and failed) to ping you in the #Question_3:_Lede part of the GG talk page. One of these days I'll get pings right, although it might be possible that it's just not possible to ping an IP user. Either way, just letting you know. AtomsOrSystems (talk) 21:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kris Kristofferson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KNHaw (talk) 01:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.