Talk:Wyoming Craton

Readers' queries

Impermeable prose. If these dynamic processes can be visualised rather than simply provided their professional labels, and if a footnote of explication is offered at the first appearance of terms that might not be immediately familiar to the general reader, this article will be friendlier to the non-specialist. --Wetman (talk) 13:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Lots of added categories and template shuffling but no change to the text in four years. I've made some edits in hopes of rendering it more accessible. Please vet them.

When the normal reader sees "collision of the Colorado orogen and the Trans-Hudson orogen with the Archean craton produced strong structural overprinting", the ordinary reader asks "what is structural overprinting, strong or otherwise?"

When the normal reader sees "The Wyoming craton consists mainly of two gross rock units" the reder asks in what sense is gross being used?" Does it mean "broadly speaking" or "in large part"?

"imaging by the "Deep Probe" analysis". An explanatory phrase at least is needed: "imaging by the "Deep Probe" analysis, which is...."

"This tectonic grain, including the 2.62 Ga Oregon Trail structure..." What's that? There is no mention at Wikipedia of an "Oregon Trail geological structure" and googling "Oregion Trail structure" produces no useful hits. So "Oregon Trail structure" needs a phrase or so introducing it.

Intrude,a jargon term, is ambiguous here: " intrude crystalline rocks of the Wyoming province." What's intruded into what? Are crystalline rocks an intrusion or are they intruded upon?--Wetman (talk) 18:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wyoming Craton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229131616/http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<1335:NCOTTO>2.3.CO;2 to http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<1335:NCOTTO>2.3.CO;2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Archive was stuffed, but thanks to DOI could be located. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)