| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Usage (language) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Usus page were merged into Usage (language) on 31 Aug 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article cites a web source at edupedia.pl. I do not speak Polish, but it appears to me that the source consists of user-generated content (note the "Edytuj" buttons on the page). Could some Polish reader verify whether the cite seems to fit the WP:Reliable sources guideline? Cnilep (talk) 01:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Plugged in two more serviceable sources. Nama.Asal (talk) 14:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Merger with Usus
editThe article stub Usus contains some information that might be of interest here but provides it under a lemma that – to my knowledge (and I would call myself a sociolinguist) – is not used in English at all. (The references given are all Polish and Czech, plus one article written in English by a Latvian linguist claiming that the term usus had been used by a Danish and a German linguist and was not used in Latvian anymore.) Therefore I will transfer some of the content of Usus to Usage (language) and make Usus a redirect to Usage (language). --Daniel Bunčić (de wiki · talk · en contrib.) 05:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)