Talk:USS West Apaum

USS West Apaum has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 4, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

GA Review

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS West Apaum (ID-3221)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Having reviewed this article, I have elected to place it On Hold, to allow a few minor issues to be fixed, mostly to do with footnote format.

Several footnotes lack retrieval dates (notably refs 2 & 4)
- Note 2 is an offline reference and, I believe doesn't need a retrieval date.
- Note 4 is a short version of the third item in the "Bibliography" section (which has a retrieval date there). If you think it needs the retreival date for the short form, I'll be happy to place it there also or instead. — Bellhalla (talk) 06:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Footnote 8 is somewhat confusing, as I don't see Shipping Board Operations listed in the "references" section.
- I was trying to avoid having to put "United States House of Representatives, Select Committee on U. S. Shipping Board Operations" and so abbreviated it. Since it was confusing, I have put the full institutional authorship. — Bellhalla (talk) 06:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Another excellent mercantile marine article, all the best in taking it forward, you can contact me on my talk-page if you have questions. Cam (Chat) 05:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

My replies are interspersed above. — Bellhalla (talk) 06:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic