Talk:UNESCO
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Spintendo in topic Proposal to improve the "activities" part
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 16, 2015 and November 16, 2020. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Åland Islands
editASSOCIATE MEMBER --> 09/11/2021 https://en.unesco.org/countries/aland-islands https://en.unesco.org/countries --139.47.45.89 (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Proposal to improve the "activities" part
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, Here is a proposal to improve the "activities" part. Could you proofread it? Thank you a lot, Regards, (E.poul (talk) 13:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC))
- @E.poul: The major issue in your proposed article/prose is the lack of secondary and reliable sources throughout. Almost every reference is either a UNESCO-affiliated site, or UNESCO-published book/journal, etc. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on usage of primary sources —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 16:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello CX Zoom,
- This document aims to correct the "activities" part of the UNESCO page, which is not up to date. Therefore, the information includes only a small part of the subjects dealt with by the organisation.
- The aim of this work is to enrich the existing content and to correct it.
- In order to be as accurate and concise as possible, the work is based on 164 sources, and since we are talking about UNESCO's activities, the most reliable sources are mainly publications or research produced by UNESCO on the subjects concerned. However, in order to comply with the rules of the platform, 50 sources out of 164 sources are secondary references, whose researchers, authors or journalists are not affiliated with UNESCO. These sources represent a total of more than 30% of the references used. They have been carefully selected and come mainly from ResearchGate, JSTOR, Cairn and also include links to the websites of the major events mentioned.
- I hope that this clarification will best explain the high regard I have for the rules of the platform and I remain at your disposal for any discussion on this subject.
- Regards,
- (~~~~) E.poul (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I have been busy for the past few days due to real life commitments, so I've added a
{{edit COI}}
template at the top of this section for other editors to have a look at it. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 16:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)- Hi CX Zoom, thanks! E.poul (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: Please cite secondary and independent reliable sources. Best regards, -- Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Johannes, thank you for your help. I have reduced the number of sources and added new ones. The majority are now independent, reliable and secondary sources. Does this work for you? Best regards, E.poul (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, @Johannes Maximilian, does it work for you know? E.poul (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Johannes, thank you for your help. I have reduced the number of sources and added new ones. The majority are now independent, reliable and secondary sources. Does this work for you? Best regards, E.poul (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: Please cite secondary and independent reliable sources. Best regards, -- Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi CX Zoom, thanks! E.poul (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I have been busy for the past few days due to real life commitments, so I've added a
I would review this, but I don't see where the proposed text is. When ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the {{request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
. Thank you! Regards, Spintendo 23:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much @Spintendo, if you are still willing to review it, you can find it here in my sandbox : User:E.poul/sandbox/UNESCO (activities). Kind regards, E.poul (talk) 12:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- The proposed text needs to be placed here on the talk page. Regards, Spintendo 20:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)