Talk:The Sea-Bell

WWI Allusions

Should it be mentioned in the Themes and Reception section that this poem is an obvious WWI metaphor? (Distant shores, and the fact that when he returned his view of where he left was different, and that him, the veteran of the travel, was regarded as a "looney"? ... -Panther (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I know it's an important aspect of most of Tolkien's work but, as you say, it's particularly evident here. I'll try to think of something to put in that addresses this - unless you'd like to do so of course? It would be good if we could get a source/reference which points out the WW1 allusions in this poem, I'm not sure much literary criticism has been done on the Sea-Bell though. Actually, I've always thought the imagery of the ending of the Sea Bell is very similar to that of Wilfred Owen's 'The Send Off' (figures returning from a traumatic experience, wandering through deserted once-familiar streets, silent and ignored). ANB (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sea-Bell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• Is "schme" a typo?

• Fixed.

Is "scehme" a word? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

No, the article has 'scheme'?

Special:Diff/1034047468. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

• Add alt text to every image.

• Done.

• Remove the comma after "king of the land".

• Done.

• Remove the comma after "First World War".

• Done.

• "dream turns to nightmare" → "dream turns to a nightmare"

• Done.

• Remove the comma after "traditional".

• Done.

• Sort categories in alphabetical order.

• Done.

• Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

• Some Dude From North Carolina - all done to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·