Talk:The London Clinic

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Editing their own page: neutrality concern

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

See page history from 5/23/16 and 5/26/16, also discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rathfelder#The_London_Clinic. I tend to agree with Rathfelder but I am not much of a Wikipedia editor, so I don't know the protocols. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.189.157 (talk) 04:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rathfelder#The_London_Clinic reproduced below for completeness:

Hi Rathfelder,

I saw that The London Clinic's wiki page mentions a 2 star rating from the Food Standards Agency, I wanted to remove this as it is now out of date content. (The London Clinic has now been awarded 5 stars)

Do you see any issue with removing the 2 star sentence and only mention the most recent 5 star rating?

Thanks, Alastair — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLondonClinic (talk • contribs) 14:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think we should leave it. It's, among other things, evidence of improvement. And if you are part of the clinic you shouldn't be editing this article.Rathfelder (talk) 16:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have again removed extensive material taken from the clinic's website and press releases. Dormskirk (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have removed even more today. Interestingly I have searched the London Clinic's website for its own conflict of interest policy - the website does not seem to mention one - perhaps that's not surprising given their apparent lack of observance of wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline. Dormskirk (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Clinic

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article mentions The Clinic (newspaper) in the "See also" section - but that's a Chilean newspaper. Was that the name of a publication of the outfit? — Ark25 (talk) 01:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Now removed. Dormskirk (talk) 17:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic