Jawad Maliki

edit

I think this should be combined with the Jawad Maliki thread? the are about the same person. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cyaxeres (talkcontribs) 14:14, April 22, 2006 (UTC)

I cannot find another article under Jawad Maliki or any other name. Please give more precise information of an existing article if you know of one. Perhaps you mean the article Jawad al-Maliki named Iraqi prime minister at our sister project, Wikinews? --Dhartung | Talk 06:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
He means Jawad maliki [1] (sic; note it now redirects to the correct spelling), which, interestingly enough, gives his year of birth as 1946. Can anyone confirm whether it was indeed 1946 or 1950, the BBC's estimate??? Jared Preston 08:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

1946

edit

I can't find a reference to a 1946 birth date online, so I removed it. His birth year appears to be uncertain to journalists; it looks like "c. 1950" is good enough for now. His hometown is right between Karbala and Hilla which may explain the confusion about birthplace. --Cam 16:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Restored Juan Cole's assesment on Maliki, his article provides lots of valuable info on the syubject Occuserpens 20:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


edit

Reference 26 in the "Censorship" section is broken. It just goes to the homepage... I'm assuming the article must have been taken down. Google search for the quote led me back to wikipedia. I couldn't get another news article that verified the quote. Here is the original link for reference: http://www.sundaytimes.co.za/zones/sundaytimesNEW/basket7st/basket7st1156426205.aspx

Sources

edit

There are plenty of sources listed at the bottom of the article. Which statements exactly are not sourced? AndrewRT 22:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image/Photo

edit

There is an image of Maliki (being sworn in, I guess) at the top of the article. Can that item be checked off the list, or should there be more images? -Fsotrain09 20:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've checked it off AndrewRT 20:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Religion info should be removed

edit

I don't think it's appropriate mentioning the religion of this man in his info box, since such a thing can't be considered a fact. AshrafSS 11:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it can. If the man professes to be a Shi'a Muslim and practices it, then he is a Shi'a Muslim. Supadawg (talk  contribs) 23:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Exile and Return to Iraq

edit

Article currently states he returned to Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein. Hussein was pushed out at great expense by powerful forces. What motivated and/or funded Malikis' return? Did he make a deal with the same forces who deposed Hussein or did he rise as a natural leader? Who paid his travel expenses coming home?Outofthebox (talk) 04:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removed terrorist statement

edit

couldn't find any evidence on this and it seems to me this addition is POV or even vandalism we should be careful of staining peoples reputations without proof, It looks like redneck POV: "if its got a beard and its a terrorist"Komaknacon 17:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it's vandalism although I would question the relevence & neutrality - I've heard the line before about Dawa and it's discussed in more detail in the article Islamic Dawa Party. Dawa clearly was involved in terrorism against Saddam - just like the African National Congress was - but I haven't seen any specific link between al-Maliki and terrorism. I would prefer to keep it out on that basis AndrewRT(Talk) 19:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

agreed.Komaknacon 11:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Members of the Daawa party are being investigated by the U.S. government for terrorism right now. It is not POV or vandalism. Blanking sentences out - what you did - is considered vandalism. Lft6771 05:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Vandalism is bad faith editing. POV disputes are not vandalism - please see WP:VAND for more information. AndrewRT(Talk) 22:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I presume you are referring to this story which relates to the 1993 Kuwaiti embasy bombing by Dawa. How is this personally linked to al-Maliki? It is relevant to Dawa which is why it is mentioned in that article. AndrewRT(Talk) 22:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Secret letter from Maliki

edit

This is copy of a recently found secret letter from Maliki to Muqtada Sadr and Iranian embassy in Baghdad, in which he suggests that heads of Sadr Militias take refuge in Iran for a temporarily period in order to not be arrested or killed by Americans (in their new campaign agaist terrotists), and not lose current positions they already got. http://www.peyamner.com/filesbank/img/200207035424.JPG

But I dont know how to reflect this in the article. Varmalo 14:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Create a section called "Relationship with Shi'a militias" or something along those lines and explain it, with proper sources. --NEMT 05:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Wow, this is a really good source, signed by the man himself. To be honest everyone had their suspicions, but this is gold. It will also be an awsome idea to mention the two or three (maybe more incidents) where Maliki urged the US government and gave them trouble until the release of dozens of Iranian officials arrested and found out via interrogation to be intelligence officials. many found in Dawa and similar party offices - including a few Sunni ones as well. I'll try find sources for that, and you mind if I go spreading that letter? Take care, and great work! Pink Princess (talk) 10:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just cleaned up

edit

I am not a wiki fan, but vandalism I hate even more. Just took off "infidel Shiite" from the name of the guy next to his photo.

Navar —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.253.130.62 (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

He is a bad man. Even worse than Saddam. He supports shiite terrorists who kill americans and hes been arresting those who oppose him or even said anything. He kills civilians. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.137.60 (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed statement about Maliki's videographer

edit

I did not find any references that said Maliki had a personal videographer capture the hanging, either a reference that said the tape was put on in his office. 69.244.38.32 06:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maliki didn't have a videographer tape the hanging. The video from the hanging was captured on the cell phone of an extremely high ranking official. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.200.200 (talk) 12:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Languages

edit

Where are the Nouri al-Maliki articles in other WP:languages? It shows that they are there when you go to edit the page, but when you view the article the languages don't show up. --Tocino 20:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you look at the bottom left hand side of teh screen, below the toolbox you should see them. AndrewRT(Talk) 21:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Does Al-Maliki speak english.Eazyskankin (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Official visits

edit

On Maliki calling Iran a dear friend--"it illustrates that the regimes deriving legitimacy from different versions of democracy in the Middle East can be warm friends."

Does it really illustrate that? Really? Me thinks this needs a citation. Framed0000 (talk) 23:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Military operations

edit

This article needs to be expanded to include the operations that Maliki ordered the ISF to carry out in Spring 2008, particularly in Basra, Mosul, Sadr City and Maysan province. The section about "stability of the coalition depends on an alliance between Sadr and Hakim" seems dubious given the large-scale fighting between the Mahdi Army and the Iraqi Security Forces recently.Lawrencema (talk) 00:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

ordinal

edit

He's not really the first prime minister of Iraq, now is he? He's at least the third since the US occupation. --Alhutch (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Right, he is not the first prime minister of Iraq, even if one only counts the period after 2003 (in fact Iraq has had prime ministers since the 1920s). However, for the past few months, anonymous editors have been restoring the "1st" when it is removed. --Cam (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Authoritarian claims

edit

The details of this article shoudl be included in the rticle. Smartse (talk) 11:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is a fantastic piece by the respected scholar Toby Dodge of the International Institute for Strategic Studies. The piece hits on the authoritarian bit for sure. - http://www.opendemocracy.net/toby-dodge/resistible-rise-of-nuri-al-maliki Bsimpson82 (talk) 16:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ties with Iran

edit

A statement about al-Maliki as a puppet of the Iranian government was removed in the first paragraph of the page. This page should be watched for POV statements. fussbalspieler7 (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

NPOV Dispute - Opening paragraph

edit

The last sentences of the opening paragraph currently read "In June 2014, the United States has asked for Maliki to give up his premiership in favor of someone who could better represent the Iraqi people. The problems that have arisen are all political, and the terrorists are now Sunnis. Nouri has been the premier of a democratic Iraq for 8 years, so it would seem sensible to transition him out." The first sentence needs a citation or it should be removed. As far as I can tell, the last two sentences have been in that paragraph for quite some time, but they seem to lack a neutral point of view. Xijjix (talk) 23:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

It appears that sentences 2-3 have been removed already. I am re-wording sentence 1 and adding a reference. The US does not speak with a single voice; this is the opinion of US officials in the executive branch ("the Obama administration", as WSJ puts it). Furthermore, there is no report that they made this request to Maliki. Although they may have, privately, it is not verifiable. Now it reads "In June 2014, United States officials said that Maliki should give up his premiership." I hope this resolves the NPOV issue. I'm going to remove the tag, please restore it if you disagree. Thundermaker (talk) 14:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

"al-Maliki" or just "Maliki"

edit

Could we please make up our minds about whether or not his surname should be rendered as "Maliki" or "al-Maliki" in the article body? What is stylistically correct? Colipon (Talk) 22:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done Changed Maliki to al-Maliki in about 20 places. Thundermaker (talk) 14:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Incumbent

edit

After searching a lot around, I came to the conclusion that al-Maliki is still Vice President. I changed the infobox to "Incumbent" as the apparent official Vice President website still features him here: [2]. Also press agency AFP refers to him as Vice President, and today Turkish Foreign Minister mentioned him with that title. I'll introduce a short paragraph now to add these facts and sources. Ilyacadiz (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done, in lead paragraph and under (now) "Later Duties", with several sources Ilyacadiz (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nouri al-Maliki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The archive.org link says "Got 302 response at crawl time". No value. Thundermaker (talk) 11:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Nouri al-Maliki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Election results

edit

Election results are completely missing in the whole article. They're missing for 2005, 2010 and 2014. They would explain why al-Maliki did not want to leave office, as he had clearly won the 2014 elections with the by far strongest political alliance. Actually, it is indeed not the best democratic fashion for a ceremonial President to nominate anyone else then the person, who had contestest the elections as the top candidate of his alliance. I understand that he would not have been able to reach a majority in parliament, but one can imagine that in a western country this would have been a scandal, to name a successor, while the predecessor did not even announce his resignation. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 02:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply