Talk:New York State Route 390

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 390/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk) 22:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

 Doing... --Admrboltz (talk) 22:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Dab/EL fine.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Looks fine. Maybe add a chunk to the exit list to mention why the numbering starts where it does, and remove the info from the See also section.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I would drop the redlink to State of New York Department of Commerce in the references.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Map needs GIS source in it, but not technically a GA requirement.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am passing this article. --Admrboltz (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Merger proposal with Interstate 390

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I propose a merger between this page and the page for Interstate 390, as the two routes are essentially two segments of the same route, just with different systems of maintenance. There are other examples of Wikipedia pages for such routes, such as Interstate 540 and North Carolina Highway 540 and Interstate 210 and State Route 210 (California). Feel free to add your thoughts on this below.

Thanks—WuTang94(user talk) 20:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm inclined to oppose. The key point with the two other articles that you listed is that there is a plan for the state highways to become part of the Interstate. Is that the case with NY 390? At a glance it seems that NY 390 was renumbered as a continuation of the Interstate. –Fredddie™ 01:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hmm, that's a good point. Never thought about the fact that NY 390 will likely stay a state highway and not be designated part of I-390. Thanks for the insight. —WuTang94(user talk) 03:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

I talked about this a long time ago, but NY 390, 590 and 890 are continuations and will never be interstate. Mitch32^{(My ambition is to hit .400 and talk 1.000.)} 01:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

@Mitchazenia Good point. Now I see you opposed the merger between I-590 and NY 590, which makes more sense now. Thanks for the insight. —WuTang94(user talk) 03:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

But then, we do have Interstate 110 and State Route 110 (California). --Rschen7754 02:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose - I-390 and NY 390 are independent highways that just happen to be continuous with each other and share a number, but are otherwise not related and the state highway portion has no intentions on becoming an Interstate. I say it is best to leave the two as separate articles. Dough4872 02:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose - For reasons stated above. --WashuOtaku (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York State Route 390. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101113205420/http://on.dot.wi.gov/wisdotresearch/database/tsrs/tsrroutenumbering1.pdf to http://on.dot.wi.gov/wisdotresearch/database/tsrs/tsrroutenumbering1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)