Talk:NCERT textbook controversies

SAAG

Credentials:

Listed by :

Columbia University: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/indiv/southasia/cuvl/govt.html

Intute: http://www.intute.ac.uk/socialsciences/cgi-bin/fullrecord.pl?handle=sosig1130857435-20312

Analysts include B. Raman (retired Additional Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, and presently Director of the Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai), S. Gopal (former Special Secretary, Govt. of India), Dr. S. Chandrasekharan, C.S. Kuppuswamy (former Director of the Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India), and others. Hkelkar 05:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, was a bit worried about them when the author is using a yahoo email as a contact point.--Tigeroo 11:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

FOSA

What is the reg rag doing in the citations? I might as well cite HinduUnity to counter argue... अमेय आर्यन DaBrood^© 20:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Opening para

I believe only schools that follow the CBSE board directly use the NCERT textbooks and am changing the opening para to reflect this. I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations 22:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:NCERT Logo.PNG

The image File:NCERT Logo.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

No factual basis what so ever

This article is based on hearsay and people who would like to portray education in India in bad light i was a student during the said reforms the text books were changed but the content was aimed at building a better historical understanding of out culture its origins , developing a deeper understanding of out artistic/ architectural heritage . the loss of a the greater world view in our history was regrettable but the history was tought to show the various points of our independence struggle to show the challenges faced. no where in the books was there any mention of a jingoistic world view ...no where i studied under this and there was absolutely nothing in it that would lend credence the tone of this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daanishbambery (talk • contribs) 02:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Communalism_and_Sanforized_content typo?

Int the header Communalism and Sanforized content

Should Sanforized read Saffronized (spelling?) I don't know so I'll leave it up to another editor. --Javaweb (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Javaweb

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NCERT textbook controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050221194653/http://www.bjp.org:80/today/July_0104/Page_13.htm to http://www.bjp.org/today/July_0104/Page_13.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: India in Global Studies

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 14 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Akankaria (article contribs). Peer reviewers: RPshiesty, Pranavxiyer.

— Assignment last updated by Adirrao (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

One-sided article

Shitty article that simply criticises the right, then has a "criticism" section to criticise the right some more - far from even a pretense of balance 2409:4055:393:73BB:0:0:29C1:8B0 (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)