Talk:Lake Te Wapu

Lake Te Wapu has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 2, 2024. (Reviewed version).

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Lake Te Wapu is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Oceania's "10,000 Challenge", which started in November 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 month ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. Arconning (talk) 13:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lake Te Wapu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 14:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Will review this in a few days^ Arconning (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Generalissima Here ya go! Hope some of my short comments shall be addressed. :) Arconning (talk) 15:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Arconning: Okiedokie! Think thats it. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

No issues, though a question; just wondering that if the "Average depth" parameter in the infobox and maximum depth mentioned in the body, shouldn't they be different as "average" connotes the average depths of different parts of the lake itself?
- Oh, good point; fixed infobox. - G

Description

No issues, just see previous question.

Flora and fauna

Optional: "However, areas of the lake not fenced-off to cattle lack tall emergent plants due to grazing.", wikilink grazing.

Media

Images have proper licensing and are relevant to the article.

Refs

Earwig shows nothing.
- Following is a source review as there are a few.
  - I'm kinda dodgy on the Lakes380 Project but I'll be passing it conditionally.
  - Meredith & Croucher 2007 is all good, statements are correct.
  - King & Morrison 1990, same as well.
  - Baling et al. 2023, can't confirm the information as I don't have direct access so AGF, though it seems good.
  - Champion & Clayton 2004, same with the previous comment.
  - Grimwood et al. 2023, good!

Misc

No ongoing edit war, broad and focused information, neutral. :)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic