Talk:Kakuma

Latest comment: 1 month ago by GingerLines in topic Unsourced Information

Town and camp

edit

Should the town and the refugee camp have separate entries? Bruxism 16:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Meaning of Kakuma

edit

Kakuma is the swahili word for "nowhere" i do not think that is accurate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.215.83.201 (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree, however it's properly sourced. The threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. I did some googling and Swahili-English dictionary checking and could not find a meaning for the word Kakuma, nor did I find any information to support the assertion that it means 'nowhere'. However, I did find some writings that mentioned people being told that it means 'nowhere', which means this isn't a fringe idea. I have changed the wording to neutrally reflect the fact that it's been asserted, but is not necessarily true. BigNate37(T) 20:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.academia.edu/19265675/Field_Trip_Kakuma_Refugee_Camp_Kenya. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 15:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kakuma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A lot of dubiuos supposition

edit

Some of this stuff about $200,000 per month sounds very tabloid. Isnt that about a dollar each? Victuallers (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

100333 105.161.137.245 (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced Information

edit

A VAST amount of this article is entirely unsourced, and I'm not sure where to even start on clearing through it without cutting down its scope dramatically. Entire sections have no citation whatsoever (See 'Food', 'Security', 'Justice', 'Economy', etc.). Only 13 citations for an article of this size screams WP:NRSNVNA. gingerlines (talk) 13:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply