Talk:Jam Filled Entertainment
Latest comment: 7 years ago by TonyBallioni in topic Requested move 8 August 2017
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2017. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
- This page is not correct - I know I have interest as I work at Jam Filled and also worked at the previous companies. But the truth is, this Jam Filled purchased some of the physical assets of Arc Productions - it did not purchase Arc Productions. This page should remain as Arc Productions with a statement indicating that it went bankrupt and a significant portion of the assets were purchases by Jam Filled. A new Jam Filled page should be created - Jam Filled is celebrating its 10 year anniversary this year. It has it's own history and we do not want people to think Arc Productions just renamed itself. Jhickson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.9.214.98 (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Are there sources that cover Jam Filled so that it may have a page? —C.Fred (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- http://www.canadiananimationresources.ca/2016/08/good-news-department-boat-rocker-buys-jam-filled-entertainment-what/ Here is one when Boat Rocker purchased Jam Filled (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- If Jam Filled is just a subsidiary of Boat Rocker, all the more reason that Jam Filled should not have an article. —C.Fred (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- This page is not correct - I know I have interest as I work at Jam Filled and also worked at the previous companies. But the truth is, this Jam Filled purchased some of the physical assets of Arc Productions - it did not purchase Arc Productions. This page should remain as Arc Productions with a statement indicating that it went bankrupt and a significant portion of the assets were purchases by Jam Filled. A new Jam Filled page should be created - Jam Filled is celebrating its 10 year anniversary this year. It has it's own history and we do not want people to think Arc Productions just renamed itself. Jhickson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.9.214.98 (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- If that is true, why would Jam Filled Toronto have an article? Jam Filled was purchased by Boat Rocker the same day Arc Productions went Bankrupt. How can a company that went bankrupt get an article, but one that is still running doesn't qualify? These are other links I found.
- http://kidscreen.com/2016/08/03/boat-rocker-adds-another-animation-studio/
- http://playbackonline.ca/2016/08/03/boat-rocker-acquires-jam-filled-entertainment/
- https://cartt.ca/article/boat-rocker-media-scoops-jam-filled-entertainment
- https://www.ebosscanada.com/amberwood-entertainment-production-great-northern-candy-drop-cbc/
- http://www.animationmagazine.net/tv/breakthrough-teletoon-team-for-crash-canyon/
- http://www.imdb.com/company/co0445987/
- https://www.averesystems.com/resources/putting-more-fun-in-cartoons
- http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/nickelodeon-2016-animated-shorts-program-2015-finalists-1201695536/
- Jhickson (talk) 17:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Arc Productions was notable before the bankruptcy, plus there's good depth of coverage on them. If JFT is the successor company of Arc, then it's the same company, and the notability "carries over". JF is not notable just because its parent company purchased the assets of a notable company that went bankrupt. —C.Fred (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- This is my entire point in the first place - JFT is not the successor company of Arc. JFT has never existed. Boat Rocker purchased Jam Filled then Jam Filled purchased part of the assets of Arc Productions. There is no citation for JFT because it never existed. Jhickson (talk) 17:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Reading this article from Deloitte: http://www.insolvencies.deloitte.ca/en-ca/Pages/ArcProductionsLtd.aspx?searchpage=Search-Insolvencies.aspx shows that a judge ordered the bankruptcy to be filed on January 27th, 2017. Which was filed on January 31st, 2017. - This also shows the purchase by Jam Filled Entertainment, an affiliate of Boat Rocker. Jhickson (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- https://www.jobbank.gc.ca/content_pieces-eng.do?cid=11604&lang=eng -Canadian Government site Jhickson (talk) 18:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- "Jam Filled Toronto[citation needed] (formerly known as Arc Productions and Starz Animation)" - There has not been a citation added to confirm the changes made in September that can verify this claim. It should be changed back to Arc Productions. Jhickson (talk) 18:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 8 August 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved as an uncontested technical request. If there is an objection within a reasonable period of time, let me know on my talk page and I'll relist. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 01:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Jam Filled Toronto → Arc Productions – Per discussion above, Jam Filled is not a successor company of Arc Productions; it merely purchased assets belonging to Arc. Jam Filled—or its parent, Boat Rocker–would need to separately meet WP:CORP and WP:GNG to qualify for an article. (At this time, it appears that neither qualifies.) —C.Fred (talk) 18:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- I have not seen any discussions on this, would that mean there are no opposing views? —Jhickson (talk) 16:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.