Background disruption sleuthing

So, the graffiti (as far as I can tell) rate on this article is abnormally high in recent months given that it "only" gets 50k views/mo. Does anyone have any clue why? Is it linked anywhere sensitive on- or offsite? Remsense 17:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Remsense It's because "Ideogram" is also the name of a generative AI company (quite popular judging from the size of its Discord server) that offers a free text-to-image model. You'll notice that some of the "graffiti" bears a resemblance to image generation prompts. Malerisch (talk) 09:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Huh. Ask a question, get an answer! @Malerisch: thanks. Remsense 13:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
{{Generative AI editnotice}} is an edit notice template for pages which are about or share names with AI text-to-image services, I'll request that it be added here. Belbury (talk) 17:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Innovation at work! Thank you, would've never thought of that. Remsense 18:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am slightly troubled by the plausibility that the edit notice has somehow caused an increase in the graffiti rate. Really, even though there's a huge red hand, the root cause is clearly minimal English literacy among those attempting to generate pictures using this talk page. Seems the only way to stop it (if we must, though I see minimal cost) is to padlock the talk page too and have a banner pointing to a subpage for unconfirmed editors who wish to to partake in discussion. Remsense 17:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply