This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesLGBTQ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article reads, 'The New Zealand Homosexual Law Reform Act 1986 is a highly controversal law that legalised consensual homosexual sex. The Act removed the provisions of the New Zealand Crimes Act 1961 that criminalised consenting gay male sex.' Firstly, I think this is probably factually wrong. That consensual sex between men should be legal is not currently a controversial view. Secondly, why on earth does the article use both the terms 'homosexual sex' and 'gay male sex'? One or the other would be fine, but not an illogical and inconsistent mixture of both. Skoojal (talk) 06:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your first point is a good one, but I think that by replacing "is" with "was" the sentence would be okay as it was certainly controversial at the time. As for your second point, there is a distinction between 'homosexual sex' and 'gay male sex' because the former term includes women and the latter term does not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newzild (talk • contribs) 04:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
.JPG)
