Talk:Fable II

Problems

The subsections under Death, Cutscenes and Dynamic World do not seem to be appearing, despite existing in the code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.205.200.19 (talk) 04:31, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fable II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090113163306/http://community.lionhead.com:80/blogs/fable_2_development/archive/2009/01/08/3275132.aspx to http://community.lionhead.com/blogs/fable_2_development/archive/2009/01/08/3275132.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090410063145/http://community.lionhead.com:80/blogs/fable_2_development/archive/2009/04/06/3322251.aspx to http://community.lionhead.com/blogs/fable_2_development/archive/2009/04/06/3322251.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:50, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fable II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090315034538/http://community.lionhead.com:80/blogs/fable_2_development/archive/2009/03/12/3314131.aspx to http://community.lionhead.com/blogs/fable_2_development/archive/2009/03/12/3314131.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091018065803/http://gameinformer.com:80/games/fable_2/b/xbox360/default.aspx to http://www.gameinformer.com/games/fable_2/b/xbox360/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fable II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302041510/http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6195116.html to http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6195116.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090218114517/http://www.game.com.au/viewtitle?code=FABLE2360 to http://www.game.com.au/viewtitle?code=FABLE2360
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.elspa.com/?i=3944

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Regarded as one of the greatest games of all time

Hi.

The game is regarded as one of the greatest of all time. The game is on the wikipedia page for games considered greatest of all time with several sources on that page. I Have put this information in the article, however since there are sources on that page games considered greatest of all time is it required that I move the sources from that page to this one also?

I checked the wikipedia-page for Zelda botw which is another game considered greatest of all time, that wikipedia page is a good article and I used the same writing as that page for fable 2 and did not use sources on the page it self just like the zelda botw wikipedia page. 98.128.167.154 (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

I just wanted to point out that I was the one who first made the bold edit to state in the lead that this video game is considered one of the best. When it was reverted, I assumed it required a consensus (the bare minimum of six sources is what is needed to list a game as one of the best), but it was for not citing the sources. In retrospect, I should have also added that claim under Reception with at least several of the six sources to make my edit less flimsy since WP:LEADCITE discourages adding footnotes to the lead. Nevertheless, it appeared to inspire an edit war marked by incivility, and the (reworded) claim still appears in the lead. If I had anything to do with kickstarting the edit war, I apologize. FreeMediaKid$ 09:22, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Gameplay section - unreliable source

A large part of the Gameplay section seems to be based on a forum post dating prior to the game's release. Some of the claims seem outlandish for tech of the time (like 120,000 fully simulated leaves in each tree) and should be sourced from post-release sources actually describing the game.

The section as a whole is kind of a mess, too. "Rent is collected every five real-time minutes" is in the second paragraph, but "the game is an action RPG where you can swing swords, shoot arrows, and shoot spells" isn't really present in the section at all. Chajusong (talk) 18:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)