This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Domitian II be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Oxfordshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editThis entry is misleading. With so little evidence of existence, "emperor" and "rule" should be avoided or put into a clearer context. Maximus Rex 20:13, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I agree it is misleading to call Domitianus II an Emperor as he never controlled the city of Rome or a military force sufficiently powerful as to preserve his regime against rivals. He is more correctly categorised as a Roman usurper.Pjbjas (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)