Talk:Defendor
A fact from Defendor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
edit"He crawls into a shell, refusing to speak to anyone following the judgement. "
I think this is wrong. He is given a paper with Kat's photo on it saying: "talk and she dies" he misinterprets this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.213.97.235 (talk) 22:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Not a comedy
editWhile based on a story about a character trapped in a comic book fantasy, I found nothing to be comical about the film. Woody gave a fine performance of a mentally disturbed man. Nothing funny about it. (Hooray for the Defendor!)--96.244.247.130 (talk) 02:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Production - To whom is being referred?
editIn the "Production" section, the pronoun "He" is used but with ambigous context (probably made sense originally, but after additions became detatched from its proper noun).
The pronoun in question is found at the beginning of this phrase:
He collected financing from Canadian film fund Telefilm Canada—about one quarter of the film's C$4 million budget—and "turn[ed] over stones to find the rest". After he added all of his personal savings, the film was still $100,000 under its financial requirements.[5]
The link is dead, and it is unclear if "He" is referring to Peter Stebbings or Nicholas Tabarrok. Both are being referenced in the same paragraph involving financing.
I would reference the link and reword after clearing up the ambiguity myself, but alas dead link.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.200.101.158 (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)