Talk:Classical genetics
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summaries of this article appear in gene and genetics. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mariahfaithh.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
editLaurel- Since you mentioned the diploid individual you should go ahead and mention the haploid individual under "basic definitions". Should define reverse genetics What were some the techniques used before the advent of molecular biology?
- Where are your sources???*****
Should mention who discovered genetic linkage Great article, very well written!
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ewells2013, DrarSoaad, Inbornone, Radhikabhake.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
radhika
editThe article is well written but the part written in methods section is general idea as how the method was developed.So I feel it should be under different section. Radhikabhake (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I
editI think that this entry should include some info. on the use of mutants in mapping genes, this was achieved well before the genetic code was known.--nixie 01:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
massive revert
editI just did a massive revert on the page. I don't know what Rscavetta was trying to say with his large rewrite, but it sounded kind of weird to me. And incoherent. And possibly wrong. He doesn't appear to be an active user, so I'm just commenting on this here. It's disconcerting to see that his edits were made over a year ago, but I guess no one felt qualified to question his addition. -Madeleine 00:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
merge this page
editThis page should be merged with "Forward Genetics." Forward Genetics = Classical Genetics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.231.246.1 (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
edit
editThese article can have a history section that will show how classical genetics was discovered. The methods and techniques should have a section so the topic can be more understandable and more complete.
[1][2][3]|publisher=Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}}</ref> Marialopez pabon (talk) 02:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
The article is very informative. However, I feel that the section basic definitions is not necessary and could be included in another section! There is a lot of information on the page that does not have any citations. It would be beneficial to support this information with great and reliable references.Ewells2013 (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Ewells2013 (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ Alberts, Bruce (2014). Molecular biology of the cell. [S.l.]: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780815344322.
- ^ Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's legacy : the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 978-0-879696-75-7.
- ^ Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's legacy : the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 978-0-879696-75-7.